Yep, gay marriage will definitely ruin the institution of marriage </sarcasm>

[USFREEDOM911]

Specify what "absolute" I used.

Then you should be able to post what percentages you meant by "plenty".
But you can't; because you just wanted to latch onto something that FELT right and you hoped would be accepted without question.

Your circular logic appears to have you chasing your tail.

 

[apple0154]

Then you should be able to post what percentages you meant by "plenty".
But you can't; because you just wanted to latch onto something that FELT right and you hoped would be accepted without question.

Your circular logic appears to have you chasing your tail.

The percentage is not important. If a country has a large population then a low percentage is still plenty.

I see we're back to your inability to comprehend, AGAIN.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

The percentage is not important. If a country has a large population then a low percentage is still plenty.

I see we're back to your inability to comprehend, AGAIN.

Your continued desire to claim that I lack comprehension is nothing more then you attempting to cover your own inability to provide anything of substance to suppport your own assertions.

 

[apple0154]

Your continued desire to claim that I lack comprehension is nothing more then you attempting to cover your own inability to provide anything of substance to suppport your own assertions.

Plenty:
a full or abundant supply or amount:
existing in ample quantity or number;
more than sufficient; ample:

Population of India: 1.2 billion

Perhaps you might review the posts before commenting.

 

[The Dude]

Gay people deserve the right to be divorced like the rest of us.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

There are plenty of people in India and Africa who can afford to support a child. Many have jobs. Have you never phoned "customer service" regarding a computer problem?

That said, most should still abstain and adopt one of the children already there.

By plenty are you referring to over 50% or less then 50%?

I have no idea of the percentages.

Then how can you refer to "plenty", if you have no idea the amount?

Going by the total population. Of course, we can debate what "plenty" means, if you wish.

First you use a word and then admit that you have no idea how it fits the discussion.
But then, that does seem to be a standard for you and all your other presentations.

Huh? I know how "plenty" fits the discussion. It appears you're the one having a problem.

No you didn't.
You just used a word that FELT right and then when asked to clarify the usage of the word, you froze.

Then you should be able to post what percentages you meant by "plenty".
But you can't; because you just wanted to latch onto something that FELT right and you hoped would be accepted without question.

Your circular logic appears to have you chasing your tail.

The percentage is not important. If a country has a large population then a low percentage is still plenty.

I see we're back to your inability to comprehend, AGAIN.

Your continued desire to claim that I lack comprehension is nothing more then you attempting to cover your own inability to provide anything of substance to suppport your own assertions.

Plenty:
a full or abundant supply or amount:
existing in ample quantity or number;
more than sufficient; ample:

Population of India: 1.2 billion

Perhaps you might review the posts before commenting.

Even after your many attempts to avoid being specific, you were unable to spin this in a direction that made you more comfortable and I see that you're still unable to provide any percentages that support your usage of the word "plenty"; as you referenced at the beginning of this exchange.

I knew that if I waited long enough, that your "circular logic" would come back to bite you in the ass.

Hopefully, after viewing your shame and lack of ability to explain your own attempt at appearing knowledgeable, you will finally be able to either; 1 admit that you were just trying to use a "feel good" comment or 2 admit that really had no clue what you were talking about, but hoped you could get away with it.

Your choice.

 

[apple0154]

Even after your many attempts to avoid being specific, you were unable to spin this in a direction that made you more comfortable and I see that you're still unable to provide any percentages that support your usage of the word "plenty"; as you referenced at the beginning of this exchange.

I knew that if I waited long enough, that your "circular logic" would come back to bite you in the ass.

Hopefully, after viewing your shame and lack of ability to explain your own attempt at appearing knowledgeable, you will finally be able to either; 1 admit that you were just trying to use a "feel good" comment or 2 admit that really had no clue what you were talking about, but hoped you could get away with it.

Your choice.

How dense can one person be? You have the definition of plenty. When an individual uses the word '"plenty" they do not normally include a percentage.

Examples:
There is plenty of food. People do not ask for a percentage
There is plenty of room. People do not ask for a percentage.
There is plenty of time. People do not ask for a percentage.

Hopefully, after viewing this you will deal with your lack of comprehension. It's long overdue.

 

[WinterBorn]

Lets try and get this topic back on track.

The original post made the point that gay marriage will not destroy the sanctity of marriage. Straights have already ruined the sanctity of marriage.

Does anyone really disagree with that premise?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

How dense can one person be? You have the definition of plenty. When an individual uses the word '"plenty" they do not normally include a percentage.

Examples:
There is plenty of food. People do not ask for a percentage
There is plenty of room. People do not ask for a percentage.
There is plenty of time. People do not ask for a percentage.

Hopefully, after viewing this you will deal with your lack of comprehension. It's long overdue.

But in the manner you used it; how can you be sure that there will be "plenty", unless you have a numberical or percentage figure to back up your assertion.
Since you have nothing to show such support, you have failed.

 

[apple0154]

But in the manner you used it; how can you be sure that there will be "plenty", unless you have a numberical or percentage figure to back up your assertion.
Since you have nothing to show such support, you have failed.

It's your lack of comprehension that is causing you to draw that conclusion.

 

[cancel2 2022]

How dense can one person be? You have the definition of plenty. When an individual uses the word '"plenty" they do not normally include a percentage.

Examples:
There is plenty of food. People do not ask for a percentage
There is plenty of room. People do not ask for a percentage.
There is plenty of time. People do not ask for a percentage.

Hopefully, after viewing this you will deal with your lack of comprehension. It's long overdue.

Apple, you have the patience of Job. By the way, it is projected that by 2025 India's middle class will be nearly 600 million.

http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/425/india-middle-class.html

 

[USFREEDOM911]

It's your lack of comprehension that is causing you to draw that conclusion.

It was you lack of being able to provide any supporting evidence that allowed that conclusion to be reached.
Next time you should support your assertions, rather then just hope they SOUND good.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Apple, you have the patience of Job. By the way, it is projected that by 2025 India's middle class will be nearly 600 million.

http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/425/india-middle-class.html

Since you appear to have followed the exchange; then why don't you offer up the percentages that Apple meant, when he used the phrase "plenty"?

That is, unless you just wanted to say something and really have no more of an idea of what they may be; anymore then Apple did.

 

[apple0154]

Since you appear to have followed the exchange; then why don't you offer up the percentages that Apple meant, when he used the phrase "plenty"?

That is, unless you just wanted to say something and really have no more of an idea of what they may be; anymore then Apple did.

Why do you ask for supporting evidence and then not check out the offered link(s)?

Aoxomoxoa posted a link and here is an excerpt. "583 million. The forecasted size of India's middle class in 2025, swelling over ten times its current approximate size of 50 million."

50 million middle class citizens. Is 50 million not "plenty"?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Why do you ask for supporting evidence and then not check out the offered link(s)?

Aoxomoxoa posted a link and here is an excerpt. "583 million. The forecasted size of India's middle class in 2025, swelling over ten times its current approximate size of 50 million."

50 million middle class citizens. Is 50 million not "plenty"?

Are you now asserting that all of the 50 milliion would adopt a child or children?

 

[cancel2 2022]

Are you now asserting that all of the 50 milliion would adopt a child or children?

Are you capable of writing a sentence without using the verb to assert?

 

[Lowaicue]

Are you capable of writing a sentence without using the verb to assert?

Probably the last word he learned. That would have been many, many years ago. He has certainly learned nothing while I have had the misfortune of knowing him.

 

[poet]

Are you capable of writing a sentence without using the verb to assert?

LOL.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Are you capable of writing a sentence without using the verb to assert?

Are you capable of concentrating on something other then your obsession with me and what I'm doing?

Isn't it about time for you to take another one of your "holiday trips" and embark on another of your child sex tours of Thialand or some such?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Probably the last word he learned. That would have been many, many years ago. He has certainly learned nothing while I have had the misfortune of knowing him.

Fuck you Brit.
You don't know me any more then I know you; but you can take a flying fuck at a rolling dognut.