The Gay Agenda On Display II

DamnYankee said:
Yes we've heard your baseless allegation before. Again, it forms the basis of your argument. So your argument fails.

But do they follow my commands? And let's ax Alias about your assertion.

Alias, are you under my command?
Click to expand...

DY, you just don't seem to be able to connect brain cells together to understand anything. No one, on the left, believes you, respects you, or pays attention to any of your claims other than to summarily dismiss them.
I have Failias on ignore, and you're soon to follow. You make no sense and add nothing, and I do mean nothing, to the discourse. You refuse to back up your outrageous claims, while asking others for proof. You're a clown and spoiled bratty schoolgirl. And everyone that I know of has had quite enough of you.
 
DamnYankee said:
Yes we've heard your baseless allegation before. Again, it forms the basis of your argument. So your argument fails.

But do they follow my commands? And let's ax Alias about your assertion.

Alias, are you under my command?
Click to expand...

Is it okay to talk about our secret decoder rings?
 
no, confused is some guy who thinks that when person A takes action X......and person B takes action X, that person A is racist because person A is white and person B is not racist because person B is black........
 
Irony:
poet said:
DY, you just don't seem to be able to connect brain cells together to understand anything. No one, on the left, believes you, respects you, or pays attention to any of your claims other than to summarily dismiss them.
I have Failias on ignore, and you're soon to follow. You make no sense and add nothing, and I do mean nothing, to the discourse. You refuse to back up your outrageous claims, while asking others for proof. You're a clown and spoiled bratty schoolgirl. And everyone that I know of has had quite enough of you.
Click to expand...
:D
 
I'm still waiting for one of them to explain how this has anything to do with a "gay agenda".
 
PostmodernProphet said:
no, confused is some guy who thinks that when person A takes action X......and person B takes action X, that person A is racist because person A is white and person B is not racist because person B is black........
Click to expand...

Not at all. Person A's action has more far- reaching consequences than person B's action, and therefore is the more damaging of the two actions. You have to include context, history, ideology, and other factors. It's not simple "black and white", though you want it to be.
 
poet said:
Not at all. Person A's action has more far- reaching consequences than person B's action, and therefore is the more damaging of the two actions. You have to include context, history, ideology, and other factors. It's not simple "black and white", though you want it to be.
Click to expand...

so the key is now "consequences"?..........a person isn't racist if no one pays attention to him?.......

let me ask you this......is a homeless white guy, sitting in a gutter, mumbling "I hate black people, give me a gun I want to kill black people", a racist?.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
so the key is now "consequences"?..........a person isn't racist if no one pays attention to him?.......

let me ask you this......is a homeless white guy, sitting in a gutter, mumbling "I hate black people, give me a gun I want to kill black people", a racist?.......
Click to expand...

Probably, but inconsequential...because he isn't concretely impacting anyone. As opposed to the financial officer, who turns down a loan to a black person, who was otherwise qualified. Then there was the incident of a crowded bus, and me loaded down with packages. An overweight white guy on a window seat and a non-descript woman (non-black) on an aisle seat. The woman gets up to get off the bus, I attempt to sit down, and the white guy motions for me not to sit down, as exclaims he is getting off at the next stop. I wound up sitting behind him for about 3 or 4 stops, and read him the riot act, publicly, until he got off the bus. Was that a racist act, on his part? Of course...and I told him so.
He could have kept his disdain for sitting next to black people to himself, instead it became manifested, physically....to his detriment and public embarrassment.
 
poet said:
Probably, but inconsequential...
Click to expand...

and if it were a homeless black guy mumbling "I hate white people, give me a gun I want to kill white people" is the answer different?.......you have said before that blacks can't be racist......

as for the rest of your post......which is less inconsequential, you not getting to sit beside him......or you spending four stops calling him a racist?.......by your definition then, are you more racist than he was?.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
and if it were a homeless black guy mumbling "I hate white people, give me a gun I want to kill white people" is the answer different?.......you have said before that blacks can't be racist......

as for the rest of your post......which is less inconsequential, you not getting to sit beside him......or you spending four stops calling him a racist?.......by your definition then, are you more racist than he was?.......
Click to expand...

Identifying the truth, and calling folks out on their shit, is never racist.
 
so the homeless white guy is probably racist but inconsequential, and the homeless black guy who did the exact same thing is never racist........yet you deny the color of their skin is the deciding factor.......

how does that work itself out in your mind?........

perhaps the guy on the bus didn't refuse to share the seat with you because you're black......maybe it was because you were gay........maybe it was because you were loaded down with packages and he didn't want to be crowded.....or......maybe he'd seen you on the bus before and already knew you were an insufferable prick........
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top