That's certainly possible, which doesn't answer my question at all.Sorry, Herman Cain is no Bill Clinton and he won't survive this.
This is becoming a scene from Blazing Saddles... "Where da white women at?"
That's certainly possible, which doesn't answer my question at all.Sorry, Herman Cain is no Bill Clinton and he won't survive this.
But...the Clintons!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juanita_Broaddrick
her accusation was a mess.
She was very confused about it and her "witnesses" all had reasons to lie about it
The most recent successful President with such allegations is certainly salient to the topic at hand, Onceler. I know you want to be <echoey deep voice>"The Protector Of the Liberals!" </echoey deep voice> But sometimes he actually is salient to the topic on a political message board.
I always call him a *&%$$^% and an $@#$, *&#$%^^&, *&%$&**((*&.
Sometimes I PM him with those names. I guess that's why I don't get any checks or even smileys. He's very sensitive!
Yeap got banned again for posting a news article the right couldnt face
I'm fascinated by this. What happened to Clinton's numbers when Juanita Broaddrick came out with her allegations? We know the end result, but I can't remember what his polls were like when she was just coming out...
I thought you said those things because you liked me...
(Today's touching emotional scene is brought to you by the letter "G" and the number "3").
Eh; you bring him up quite a lot. I'm quite certain that you wouldn't if he had an (R) next to his name.
When did Juanita Broddrick come out with her allegations? Once you answer that question you will understand why comparing Clinton and Cain isn't exactly apples to apples.
Again, if she were the only one you may be right, but she wasn't. And comparing fruits in a conversation about fruit is certainly a valid comparison. The concept that comparing different fruits is impossible is foolish.
The main difference I see between the two is in how they handled the original allegations.