why the occupiers will win in one word

You really should work on your comprehension ability.

Maybe if I used a melonballer, to remove my frontal lobe, I could finally understand the Liberal way of looking at thinks; seeing as how logic doesn't seem to have anything to do with Liberal conclusions or their ability to recognize future consequences resulting from current actions,
 
Straw man. Gosh....I thought fighting for your fair share of the economic pie is capitalism? How the fuck is that socialism? What the occupiers want is accountability in our system that holds those who commit crimes accountable, not consider them "To big to fail" and subsidize their asses. Hell it's you who are supporting socialism by propping these failures in the banking industry up. It if wasn't for the fact they would have taken most of the American public down the drain with them we would have let the bastards drown. So please tell me Mr. Strawman, why are these white collar criminals so special that they can't be held accountable.

The sad fact is they aren't advocating socialism. The hard cold truth is you are advocating an aristocracy of money and if you're not one of them, you have to take what they give you regardless of your talents, skills and productivity. So keep up with your lame demonizing of people who are fighting for their share of the pie. Anyone who doesn't see the incetious relationship between Wall Street, Investment Banking and the Good ole boy Ivy League clique is a damned fool if you don't think these people should be held accountable for what they did to our economy then you're not only a damned fool but a stupid one too!

First of all, we don't "fight" for a share of the economic pie, we have to work for it, compete for it, and earn it. Secondly, I am interested in any information you have of someone who broke a law and has not been held accountable. To my knowledge, that hasn't happened. Thirdly, Wall Street is a place, it has no ability to have a relationship, the companies who trade on Wall Street, the Investment Bankers, and Ivy League Good Ole Boys, are pretty much the same people. They are held accountable when they break the law, some are even sent to prison when convicted. Again, any information on those who haven't been held accountable, please let me know.

The thing I think you are upset over, is the role your politicians played in making it possible for these people to do what they did. It's not like the Federal Government never knew about what was going on, they enacted the legislation which made it possible. There was oversight from several Federal agencies, which were established for just that reason... yet you want to blame all our problems on the people who made money legally, using the means granted them by the government.

The sad fact is, you are a dupe for Marxist socialism, and don't even seem to be aware of it.
 
Maybe if I used a melonballer, to remove my frontal lobe, I could finally understand the Liberal way of looking at thinks; seeing as how logic doesn't seem to have anything to do with Liberal conclusions or their ability to recognize future consequences resulting from current actions,

Yes, Liberals have a different way of "looking at thinks". :) There would be greater consequences from a bank robbery than from a single chocolate bar robbery.

And, please, put the mellonballer down.
 
I never said anything about rape not being a priority. We were talking about a chocolate bar. (Msg #55) Chocolate bars, Lad. Chocolate bars.

That's what you brought up, in an attempt to spin away from the rape discussion.
Just because you attempted to make it so, doesn't mean that I have to follow your attempt.
 
Yes, Liberals have a different way of "looking at thinks". :) There would be greater consequences from a bank robbery than from a single chocolate bar robbery.

And, please, put the mellonballer down.

There you go again, trying to promote the idea that a store owners loss isn't important.
 
There you go again, trying to promote the idea that a store owners loss isn't important.

It is less important than a bank robbery in terms of how society deals wit it.

Here's the reality. (Excerpt) CAMDEN — Firefighters began turning in their helmets and police officers their badges today as part of deep municipal layoffs destined to further erode the quality of life in Camden, already one of the nation's most impoverished and crime-ridden cities.

As many as 383 workers, representing one-fourth of the local government work force, are expected to lose their jobs, including about half the police force and one-third of the city's firefighters.(End)
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/01/mass_police_layoffs_being_in_c.html

As services are cut back things have to be prioritized.
 
bg110411dAPR20111104034517.jpg
 
It is less important than a bank robbery in terms of how society deals wit it.

Here's the reality. (Excerpt) CAMDEN — Firefighters began turning in their helmets and police officers their badges today as part of deep municipal layoffs destined to further erode the quality of life in Camden, already one of the nation's most impoverished and crime-ridden cities.

As many as 383 workers, representing one-fourth of the local government work force, are expected to lose their jobs, including about half the police force and one-third of the city's firefighters.(End)
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/01/mass_police_layoffs_being_in_c.html

As services are cut back things have to be prioritized.

But then this has nothing to do with your accusation that society deals with bank robberies, while ignoring the robbery of a corner store.
 
Your attempt was to avoid the entire situation and it's apparent that you've become frustrated; because I won't allow you to run away from it.

I never said anything about rape not being a priority. We were talking about a chocolate bar. (Msg #55) Chocolate bars, Lad. Chocolate bars.
 
I never said anything about rape not being a priority. We were talking about a chocolate bar. (Msg #55) Chocolate bars, Lad. Chocolate bars.

NO, the discussion was abouit rape; but you wanted it to be about a chocoate bar and you don't get to change the subject, just because you want to avoid being responsible.
 
But you claim that it's about priority and have offered nothing to support it, except for constantly claiming that it is.

NJ police layoffs lead to sharp rise in city violence
http://blog.nj.com/njv_editorial_page/2011/07/nj_police_layoffs_lead_to_shar.html

Fed grants will reverse some NJ police layoffs
http://www.chron.com/news/article/Fed-grants-will-reverse-some-NJ-police-layoffs-2192861.php

There's an example of the problem. Police are being laid off so they must prioritize the crimes they investigate. Why are you having such difficulty understanding something so simple?
 
Back
Top