Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
http://www.benefitspro.com/2011/11/...&utm_medium=eNL&utm_campaign=BenefitsPro_eNLs
As most of you know, the defensive medicine practices described in the article irk me as they are a part of the problem our overly litigious society has created. That said, I doubt there are any of us on this board that are going to argue in favor of doctors going name brand over generic and costing the individuals (or more likely their insurance companies) about $5.8 Billion in extra expenses each year.
I would encourage every single person on this board to write both of their Senators as well as their Rep and say WTF?
Want a simple piece of legislation..... How about.... 'it is now mandatory that all doctors prescribing drugs give the name of a generic alternative to the medicine they are prescribing if one is available, with the costs difference (or approximation)'
But the single biggest expense comes from doctors prescribing brand-name drugs rather than their generic counterparts, accounting for $5.8 billion alone.
As most of you know, the defensive medicine practices described in the article irk me as they are a part of the problem our overly litigious society has created. That said, I doubt there are any of us on this board that are going to argue in favor of doctors going name brand over generic and costing the individuals (or more likely their insurance companies) about $5.8 Billion in extra expenses each year.
I would encourage every single person on this board to write both of their Senators as well as their Rep and say WTF?
Want a simple piece of legislation..... How about.... 'it is now mandatory that all doctors prescribing drugs give the name of a generic alternative to the medicine they are prescribing if one is available, with the costs difference (or approximation)'