It's the 1% Doctrine, Stupid

signalmankenneth

Verified User
The Failure of the I Got Mine and Yours, Too Theory of Governance, And Whats Next?by John Atcheson

As week seven of Occupy Wall Street dawns, much of the media and the establishment continue to act as if everything about the protests were an ineffable mystery.


Well, its really not that mysterious. To paraphrase James Carville yet again, its the 1% Doctrine, Stupid.

When 75% of the people support raising taxes on the rich, but their elected representatives wont represent them, what else can people do, but take their grievances to the streets? And this is no isolated case: on issue after issue, elected "representatives" are ignoring the peoples wishes, choosing to represent the ultra-rich and corporations instead.


When government gives banks and Wall Street some $12.8 trillion of the taxpayers hard-earned money in direct funds, guarantees and near zero interest loans, and the fat cats turn around and spend it on bonuses and high-risk investments rather than fixing the real economy for the 99% who have been affected, dont ask why people are angry. Especially when not a single bankster or speculator has been busted for a plethora of real crimes, while people lose their homes to improperly documented foreclosures.


When the one-percenters and their bought-and-paid-for government pass a faux financial reform bill that doesn't actually change the way things are done in the Banks boardrooms or on Wall Street and people take to the streets, how can that be a mystery?


And yes, that means you, too, Clinton, Obama and the Democratic Party. Your abject collusion with the one-percenters, while spouting populist rhetoric every four years, is in some ways more worthy of disdain than the Republicans outright embrace of the 1% Doctrine.


When the Supreme Court is dominated by corporatists and makes corporate- friendly rulings like Citizens United, assuring that government can be bought by the highest bidder, it should come as no great mystery when people take to the streets.


When the press becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of corporate America, replacing truth, facts, and accuracy with balance and leaving reality on the cutting room floor, dont act mystified when the people stop swallowing corporate propaganda, and seek truth on their own.


And when, since Reagan, one-percenters have been taking all of the wealth gained from increased productivity and stuffing it into their own pockets, while stiffing workers, it should come as no great mystery when the people catch on and take to the streets.

Without a sense that government can do anything to right these gross crimes against the citizenry indeed, when government is saddled with policies, laws, budgets and elected corporate lackeys guaranteeing it cant address them where else could the people turn but to the streets?


And to those who knock government as intrinsically incompetent and inept, remember, it has been made so by design since the 80s. For more than three decades prior to that, we had sustained and widely shared prosperity thanks to regulations and programs passed in the New Deal. For five decades prior, we paid higher taxes and got great value for it. Since Reagan, weve been cutting taxes and all were getting are wars, debt, inequality and plutocratic pork.


But what do they want, the establishment whines.

The mainstream media, politicians and assorted other pundits are perplexed because the Occupy Movement has not issued a series of demands in bulletized, media-friendly sound bites.


But if you want to understand whats going on, Mr. Jones, simply look at what they do, and how they operate.


Within the various Occupy camps, they have set up a society that emphasizes inclusion, not exclusion. They pursue the positive and affirmative issues that unite us, rather than the fear and hate-based issues that divide us. They advocate a society in which corporations serve the interests of the people, rather than people serving and being subservient to the interests of corporations.


They are rejecting the politics of us vs. them, and embracing the politics of creating a greater us. They are advocating an economic system that respects environmental realities as well as meeting the rights and welfare of the people.

The Occupy movement recognizes that a society, economy or country is neither great nor successful simply because it amasses the most wealth conceivable. No matter how high the GDP, a system that serves the interests of a scarce few at the expense of the many is a failure. A society that exploits unborn generations and the natural world on behalf of the 1%, is profoundly immoral.


Heres the deal: for thirty years, under the 1% Doctrine, fat-cats and plutocrats have systematically destroyed peoples' faith in government so they could take over. Theyve succeeded. The result? The US economy now has the same level of income inequality as such third world countries as Uganda and Cameroon, and persistent real unemployment hovering above 20%, and we are stealing any hope of a sustainable future from our children in order to give fat cats yet another bloated bonus.

We the people, the 99% -- are sick to death, literally, of the failed policies of the 1% Doctrine.
The future if we are to have one worth living belongs to us. Step aside, one percenters. The tide of history is rolling in.
occ-99-pennies.gif

 
75% of the people support raising taxes on the rich,

the other 25% are worried they might BE the rich.........everyone is prepared to have somebody else pay for everything.....the simple fact is we spend too much, and the occubaggers want us to spend even more.......free college education for everyone, $20 minimum wage, permanent unemployment compensation......sounds like Greece......
 
That could be funded along with free healthcare with a 60 percent reduction in military spending and taxing medical herb. Ie. kick the Gestapo out of town
 
That could be funded along with free healthcare with a 60 percent reduction in military spending and taxing medical herb. Ie. kick the Gestapo out of town

it could also be funded if we eliminated education and welfare......we both know neither is going to happen so we have to look at realistic options instead......
 
Make college free like high school. Shit only 75 percent finish high school. Maybe we could double the college grade rate to 50 percent.
 
stupidest fucking thing you've said today. the people using medical herb are mostly the poor ones, idiot.

Right.

Poor people can afford to smoke weed.

You are an idiot.

Weed is the largest cash crop in the country.

Those of us who smoke are more than willing to pay taxes on it, in exchange for availability, legitimacy and to contribute our share.

Do some learning before speaking.
 
Last edited:
1) Re-implement Glass Steagall
2) Repeal Dodd/Frank
3) Cut defense spending (mainly admin roles and the foreign bases we no longer need) by at least 1/3
4) All line items back to 2007 levels. Inflation has been moot since then according to the government, thus there is no valid reason not to go back to those levels.
5) Cut Dept of Education budget (again, restructure, there is way too much admin in the system)
6) Cut the $500B in waste in Medicare that Obama 'found' but has done little to correct.
7) Legalization of drugs, with subsequent taxation similar to alcohol and tobacco. Make the penalties for causing harm to another or another's property harsh.
8) Immediate release of all non-violent drug offenders from prison.
9) Immediate cessation of all amenities while in prison. you want cable tv... don't get thrown in jail. Same with weights etc... Also get rid of the club med atmosphere for white collar criminals in minimum security facilities.
10) Stiffen penalties for white collar criminals. You steal $5000 from a convenience store and you get 10 years+ in jail. You steal $5B in ponzi scheme/corporate fraud, you go to jail for about 5 years? WTF?
 
One more way to get us out of this recession: massively raise taxes on large incomes, thus incentivizing reinvesting into the business instead of feeding your exorbitant salary. Imagine how much better the economy would run if all of that money that's being drained out to be spent on yachts were instead invested back into the business.
 
3) Cut defense spending (mainly admin roles and the foreign bases we no longer need) by at least 1/3

Let's wait until the recession is over to cut defense spending. At the current time, I'd actually support increases.

4) All line items back to 2007 levels. Inflation has been moot since then according to the government, thus there is no valid reason not to go back to those levels.

Two of our biggest budget items, social security and medicare, rise at rates far above that of inflation. You couldn't really cut these back medicare without restructuring the program to dole out less medicine, and you couldn't really cut social security without cutting paychecks to senior. I mean, good luck, if that's the path you want to go down.

6) Cut the $500B in waste in Medicare that Obama 'found' but has done little to correct.

Medicare's budget is around 700 billion.

9) Immediate cessation of all amenities while in prison. you want cable tv... don't get thrown in jail. Same with weights etc... Also get rid of the club med atmosphere for white collar criminals in minimum security facilities.

I do not intend to get thrown in jail. The Zimmer ammendment, passed in the 90's, got rid of weights (there may still be aerobic equipment, but I don't see anything wrong with that) and R rated movies. Some federal prisons might have cable TV showing the Disney channel or something, I don't know. However, rape is probably one of the most horrifying things that can happen to a human being, and, as is often humorously acknowledged in the media, this is rather common in prison. It's also brushed over, and sometimes actually used by the guards as a method of keeping prisoners in line. I think that might make up for things a bit.

10) Stiffen penalties for white collar criminals. You steal $5000 from a convenience store and you get 10 years+ in jail. You steal $5B in ponzi scheme/corporate fraud, you go to jail for about 5 years? WTF?

The harsh penalties for robbery are usually there more because of the terror inflicted on the person (you're being reckless with their life, so, from an intentionalist perspective, it's kind of akin to manslaughter) and the potential for re-offense, it's not really leveled out in proportion to the amount of money stolen, since the property damage is kind of a secondary issue. With white collar crime, there's little potential for re-offense (who would hire them?), and the actual property damage is definitely the central issue. Not saying that white collar criminals aren't underpunished, but comparing the literal monetary amounts just isn't a good argument.

Whatever case your referring to may have been mainly a case of the prosecutor being uncertain if he can prove his case, and the two sides splitting the difference (cynical, sure, but that's how our legal system works). White collar criminals are able to theoretically be given large sentences when things are absolutely certain, as Bernie Madoff's case shows. With lower class criminals, on the other hand, well, there are usually cameras in convenience stores, and juries will usually convict whatever minority individual you put up in front of them anyway.
 
the other 25% are worried they might BE the rich.........everyone is prepared to have somebody else pay for everything.....the simple fact is we spend too much, and the occubaggers want us to spend even more.......free college education for everyone, $20 minimum wage, permanent unemployment compensation......sounds like Greece......

I'm honestly not really in favor of ending college tuition anymore. If you specialize in any sort of practical field, you should be able to pay off the loans anyway, so it'd be welfare to upper class people. If you're not specializing in a practical field, well, I think it's good to disincentivize that anyway.
 
Care to point out what you think is stupid?

that you and topsin are idiotic enough to think that taxing medical marijuana is going to solve all of your budget issues when you retards can't fucking realize that rich people don't NEED med marijuana because they can already afford the medical care that they need. and your stupid notion that poor people won't be able to afford marijuana when it's legal.
 
that you and topsin are idiotic enough to think that taxing medical marijuana is going to solve all of your budget issues when you retards can't fucking realize that rich people don't NEED med marijuana because they can already afford the medical care that they need. and your stupid notion that poor people won't be able to afford marijuana when it's legal.

Topdude said medical. I am talking about making it legal and taxing it all.
Do a little research. You will find that taxing it would indeed have a tremendous impact on the budget.

As to your other retarded comment, poor people smoke cheap weed or very little good weed.
It's irelevent though.
 
Back
Top