How Did Barack Obama Become "The Magic Negro"?

The problem isn't the lefty idiots. The problem is those who listen to their bullshit and take it seriously. Like these two women and their bullshit claim against Herman Cain.
 
Southern Chicken said:
Also from your source
http://www.bidstrup.com/index.htm

Why I Support A Primary Challenge To Barack Obama - And Won't Vote For Him Again
Three years ago, when Barack Obama was merely a candidate for the Democratic nomination for the presidency, I began to encounter some troubling signs that he was not what he appeared to be. Several columnists whom I trust were warning, even then, that this man was a conservative in progressives' clothing and that was evident from his voting record as a senator if anyone would bother to check, and from some of the speeches he gave before the Chicago Council On Global Affairs, speeches in which his militaristic adventurism was on full display. Many of his campaign team policy advisers were neoconservatives, most hired out of the Bush administration. It didn't look good, but when I mentioned this to my progressive friends, I was uniformly shouted down - so fervent was the desire for real change from the horror of the Bush years. So I shut up, and like them, voted for the man, however reluctantly. Then I moved to a home in a place where Internet service was not available, and my ability to research was largely cut off for several months. I was unable to do much research.
When my access to the Internet was finally restored, just days before he was inagurated as president, I was finally able to sit down and do some serious research on this man. And what I discovered was nothing short of appalling. He had been a CIA asset fresh out of college (which is why his Columbia transcript has never been released, and professors there have been forbidden from talking about him - and why the details of his post-college employment at a CIA front company have been kept very sketchy), and he had been trained in propaganda and disinformation, which is what he practiced on that job. The Washington Post reported the very day my Internet was turned on, that he had reassured conservatives just the day before that he had every intention of "reforming" Social Security and Medicare, but had to wait until the economy was in better shape before he could do so.

So it came as no surprise to me at all when I began to see that he was indeed a Manchurian Candidate, designed to appear to be a refreshing progressive, but a man with a hidden agenda, largely implemented out of sight, that it is hard to describe as anything other than hard-core neoconservative, in some ways, even more so than his predecessor. Over time, a lot of my progressive friends have slowly come around to recognizing that what I tried to warn them of was true. But alas, it is too late. We were stuck with yet another neoconservative, this one with a winning smile, a slick, smooth manner and a whole lot of political capital to spend on nefarious projects.

So the big question now facing the progressive community is what to do about it next year. Do we vote for Obama and watch ourselves be betrayed for another four years? Do we vote for a third-party candidate and throw our votes away? And watch some Republican wingnut take the helm of the Ship of State? Our dilemma was very arrogantly summed up by Obama's sleazy chief of staff at the time, Rahm Emmanuel, who, when asked about Obama's betrayal of the progressives that put him in office, said, "So what? Where they gonna go?"



SO DO YOU STILL FIND YOUR LINK TRUE??????
Click to expand...

Yes. Why not? The author expressed his personal opinion, as to why he wouldn't vote for President Obama again. Has no effect as to my motivation. BFD.
 
Alias said:
Does the term "Magic Negro" offend you or does it depend on who says it that offends you?
Click to expand...

No. Why would it offend me? You obviously don't understand the concept or the context. Typical. Again, read the fucking article.
 
Alias said:
The problem isn't the lefty idiots. The problem is those who listen to their bullshit and take it seriously. Like these two women and their bullshit claim against Herman Cain.
Click to expand...

Please share with us, how you know, for a fact that it's a bullshit claim. Were you a witness? Have you spoken to anyone present? No? Then all you have is hearsay, which is inadmissible in a court of law. STFU.
 
Damocles said:
You should take the exit into Libertarian offered in that contract. It is a little known inclusion in the fine print.
Click to expand...

Freedom is slavery, damo.

I am contractual bound to recite that five times a day, in the direction of San Fransisco. Including the damo part. Pretty weird coincidence, huh?
 
Alias said:
If libertarians became the majority, they wouldn't last long. Their own lack of order would allow the bullies in the left to run them like they do here on this forum.
Click to expand...

Yep, the left is full of angry, aggressive bullies. That's why we, as we so often proudly declare, utterly dominate the right in the field of angry, obnoxious punditry, on cable as well as radio. We just can't get enough of it. President Obama, as well, has just been such a dominating figure, rather than a meek wimp who caves to the right at every opportunity.
 
Southern Chicken said:
Also from your source
http://www.bidstrup.com/index.htm

Why I Support A Primary Challenge To Barack Obama - And Won't Vote For Him Again
Three years ago, when Barack Obama was merely a candidate for the Democratic nomination for the presidency, I began to encounter some troubling signs that he was not what he appeared to be. Several columnists whom I trust were warning, even then, that this man was a conservative in progressives' clothing and that was evident from his voting record as a senator if anyone would bother to check, and from some of the speeches he gave before the Chicago Council On Global Affairs, speeches in which his militaristic adventurism was on full display. Many of his campaign team policy advisers were neoconservatives, most hired out of the Bush administration. It didn't look good, but when I mentioned this to my progressive friends, I was uniformly shouted down - so fervent was the desire for real change from the horror of the Bush years. So I shut up, and like them, voted for the man, however reluctantly. Then I moved to a home in a place where Internet service was not available, and my ability to research was largely cut off for several months. I was unable to do much research.
When my access to the Internet was finally restored, just days before he was inagurated as president, I was finally able to sit down and do some serious research on this man. And what I discovered was nothing short of appalling. He had been a CIA asset fresh out of college (which is why his Columbia transcript has never been released, and professors there have been forbidden from talking about him - and why the details of his post-college employment at a CIA front company have been kept very sketchy), and he had been trained in propaganda and disinformation, which is what he practiced on that job. The Washington Post reported the very day my Internet was turned on, that he had reassured conservatives just the day before that he had every intention of "reforming" Social Security and Medicare, but had to wait until the economy was in better shape before he could do so.

So it came as no surprise to me at all when I began to see that he was indeed a Manchurian Candidate, designed to appear to be a refreshing progressive, but a man with a hidden agenda, largely implemented out of sight, that it is hard to describe as anything other than hard-core neoconservative, in some ways, even more so than his predecessor. Over time, a lot of my progressive friends have slowly come around to recognizing that what I tried to warn them of was true. But alas, it is too late. We were stuck with yet another neoconservative, this one with a winning smile, a slick, smooth manner and a whole lot of political capital to spend on nefarious projects.

So the big question now facing the progressive community is what to do about it next year. Do we vote for Obama and watch ourselves be betrayed for another four years? Do we vote for a third-party candidate and throw our votes away? And watch some Republican wingnut take the helm of the Ship of State? Our dilemma was very arrogantly summed up by Obama's sleazy chief of staff at the time, Rahm Emmanuel, who, when asked about Obama's betrayal of the progressives that put him in office, said, "So what? Where they gonna go?"



SO DO YOU STILL FIND YOUR LINK TRUE??????
Click to expand...

I still don't know why we went with Obama. Clinton would have pwned McCain just as soundly. And she's tough. She was not the most left-wing candidate, of course, but it was clear from the outset that Obama was actually to the right of her. Yet Obama won with the support of the left. Why oh why?
 
Watermark Buddha said:
I still don't know why we went with Obama. Clinton would have pwned McCain just as soundly. And she's tough. She was not the most left-wing candidate, of course, but it was clear from the outset that Obama was actually to the right of her. Yet Obama won with the support of the left. Why oh why?
Click to expand...
Because many Democrats felt that Hilliary was to polarizing of a figure.
 
Watermark Buddha said:
I still don't know why we went with Obama. Clinton would have pwned McCain just as soundly. And she's tough. She was not the most left-wing candidate, of course, but it was clear from the outset that Obama was actually to the right of her. Yet Obama won with the support of the left. Why oh why?
Click to expand...

Because the left put Obama in front and Clinton was too far behind to catch up. Blame your own base for Obama being President. What's the matter? Having buyers remorse?
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Because many Democrats felt that Hilliary was to polarizing of a figure.
Click to expand...

Come on. You were caught up in the hope of the first black pres and the thought of an intellegent president after 8 years of the idiot-puppet.

Hillary had the experience, the balls, and Bill.
Ted Kennedy fucked it up by throwing his endorsement to Obama.
Obama should have been vice, for 8 years, then pres in '16, but no, we had to have instant gratification
Hillary would have busted balls and kicked ass after what the repugs put her through in the nineties.

We would have had single payer, Bush players held criminaly responsible, and left the two wars by now.

Obama has done a lot of good, but not enough push.
 
Watermark Buddha said:
John Edwards was, of course, the most left-leaning of the pack. But our decision to meh him turned out to be a good one.
Click to expand...

Good thing we also found out about Weiner before he got to far up the ladder. As par for the course, the dems blamed a right wing blogger for as long as they could until it became too obvious it was actually Weiner who did the nasty deed. Reminded me of Hillary blaming the "vast right wing conspiracy for the nasty deeds of her husband until it became too obvious. Sick leftyy fucks.
 
Alias said:
The fact you're allowed to alter the quotes of posters confirms exactly what I'm talking about. Most reputable political forums would have banned you for it.
Click to expand...

Funny statement coming from the retard who was banned for it.
 
Alias said:
Because the left put Obama in front and Clinton was too far behind to catch up. Blame your own base for Obama being President. What's the matter? Having buyers remorse?
Click to expand...

Even a broken clock is correct now and then.
 
Return of Dune said:
Funny statement coming from the retard who was banned for it.
Click to expand...

That's my point. Damocles is a fucking idiot libertarian who doesn't have rules or enforce the ones he has. You wouldn't get by with altering quotes on a reputable political forum and you know it. You're far too weak to last long on a real political forum.
 
Yurt said:
he ASKED if it was racist
Click to expand...

can we start a thread asking if niggerjewcuntfag is an appropriate word? I think the jury is still out on that. Why are black jewish lesbians allowed to say that word but I am not? Society is fucked up.

I am JUST ASKING
 
although i guess it's more understandable to cheat on hilary clinton than your wife who has cancer, and you also have a baby with someone else and get an aid to claim it as their own.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top