Obama says if he loses we'll be in for a new, painful era of self-reliance

LOL

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...overnment-will-tell-people-youre-on-your-own/

I guess for a leech like Obama and the idiots who subscribe to his philosophy of government, self-reliance is something incomprehensible.

Thanks, Obama. Nothing you could ever say would make the distinction between you and hard working americans any more clear.

I wonder if that explains why child abuse is endemic in famously 'self reliant' states like Texas?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15193530
 
LOL

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...overnment-will-tell-people-youre-on-your-own/

I guess for a leech like Obama and the idiots who subscribe to his philosophy of government, self-reliance is something incomprehensible.

Thanks, Obama. Nothing you could ever say would make the distinction between you and hard working americans any more clear.

What would your answer be if you were asked how big your government should be? Or how much tax you should pay, or whether you wanted the defence of your country or hospitals or schools?

I would love to see those right wing lunatics who have lost the plot, have to repair the roads outside their own houses, to put out the fire in their neighbours house, to watch a murderer walk free because there was no money to run the courts. It would be good news for the terrorists who could just walk in unhindered , kill and then walk out again.....

Oh, wait a minute, you don't actually mean the government is too big, do you? Because you have no idea just how big it is. But by the hell, you want to get rid of that 'boy' in the whitehouse, dont you? He doesn't get any whiter with the weather does he, and by golly if ever he is successful with your economy you'll never see his black ass disappear!!
 
LOL

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...overnment-will-tell-people-youre-on-your-own/

I guess for a leech like Obama and the idiots who subscribe to his philosophy of government, self-reliance is something incomprehensible.

Thanks, Obama. Nothing you could ever say would make the distinction between you and hard working americans any more clear.

Excerpt from posted link. "I reject an argument that says we’ve got to roll back protections that ban hidden fees by credit card companies, or rules that keep our kids from being exposed to mercury, or laws that prevent the health insurance industry from exploiting people who are sick,” Obama said. “And I reject the idea that somehow if we strip away collective bargaining rights, that we’ll be somehow better off.

“We should not be in a race to the bottom where we take pride in having the cheapest labor and the most polluted air and the least protected consumers,” he said. (End)

How will self-reliance solve those problems? And why do you refer to people who approve of Obama's policies as leeches considering those policies will cover everyone, even hard working Americans?
 
An era of self reliance. Poor babies. I wonder how those pioneers settled the west? Good thing they had FEMA and the Transportation Department to help them out. Parasites.
 
"painful era of self-reliance in America."

That is absolutely a poor choice of words. Seriously... That was stupid. Remember when just saying that he wanted to redistribute some wealth was a huge thing in the last election?
 
What would your answer be if you were asked how big your government should be? Or how much tax you should pay, or whether you wanted the defence of your country or hospitals or schools?

I would love to see those right wing lunatics who have lost the plot, have to repair the roads outside their own houses, to put out the fire in their neighbours house, to watch a murderer walk free because there was no money to run the courts. It would be good news for the terrorists who could just walk in unhindered , kill and then walk out again.....

Oh, wait a minute, you don't actually mean the government is too big, do you? Because you have no idea just how big it is. But by the hell, you want to get rid of that 'boy' in the whitehouse, dont you? He doesn't get any whiter with the weather does he, and by golly if ever he is successful with your economy you'll never see his black ass disappear!!

what do my local municiple services have to do with Obama getting elected?
 
what do my local municiple services have to do with Obama getting elected?

So no national government but unlimited local government, huh. That's OK then. Who will pay, then, when you find there are two firemen where there should be one? You?
Anyway I guess it would be OK just so long as they didn't tax caravans or ban guns.

What is the English for Yeee-hahhh?
 
What would your answer be if you were asked how big your government should be? Or how much tax you should pay, or whether you wanted the defence of your country or hospitals or schools?

I would love to see those right wing lunatics who have lost the plot, have to repair the roads outside their own houses, to put out the fire in their neighbours house, to watch a murderer walk free because there was no money to run the courts. It would be good news for the terrorists who could just walk in unhindered , kill and then walk out again.....

Oh, wait a minute, you don't actually mean the government is too big, do you? Because you have no idea just how big it is. But by the hell, you want to get rid of that 'boy' in the whitehouse, dont you? He doesn't get any whiter with the weather does he, and by golly if ever he is successful with your economy you'll never see his black ass disappear!!

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that these philosophical discussions about the size and scope of government were taking place online since at least the time I joined the politics.com forum back in 2002. That would be before anyone here had even heard of Mr. Obama, but, again, I could be mistaken in all of this speculation...
 
Back
Top