The Rise of the Regressive Right

Bfgrn

New member
Progressives believe in openness, equal opportunity, and tolerance. Progressives assume we're all in it together: We all benefit from public investments in schools and health care and infrastructure. And we all do better with strong safety nets, reasonable constraints on Wall Street and big business, and a truly progressive tax system. Progressives worry when the rich and privileged become powerful enough to undermine democracy.

Regressives take the opposite positions.

Eric Cantor, Paul Ryan, Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann and the other tribunes of today's Republican right aren't really conservatives. Their goal isn't to conserve what we have. It's to take us backwards.

They'd like to return to the 1920s -- before Social Security, unemployment insurance, labor laws, the minimum wage, Medicare and Medicaid, worker safety laws, the Environmental Protection Act, the Glass-Steagall Act, the Securities and Exchange Act, and the Voting Rights Act.

In the 1920s Wall Street was unfettered, the rich grew far richer and everyone else went deep into debt, and the nation closed its doors to immigrants.

Rather than conserve the economy, these regressives want to resurrect the classical economics of the 1920s -- the view that economic downturns are best addressed by doing nothing until the "rot" is purged out of the system (as Andrew Mellon, Herbert Hoover's Treasury Secretary, so decorously put it).

In truth, if they had their way we'd be back in the late nineteenth century -- before the federal income tax, antitrust laws, the Pure Food and Drug Act, and the Federal Reserve. A time when robber barons -- railroad, financial, and oil titans -- ran the country. A time of wrenching squalor for the many and mind-numbing wealth for the few.

Listen carefully to today's Republican right and you hear the same Social Darwinism Americans were fed more than a century ago to justify the brazen inequality of the Gilded Age: Survival of the fittest. Don't help the poor or unemployed or anyone who's fallen on bad times, they say, because this only encourages laziness. America will be strong only if we reward the rich and punish the needy.

The regressive right has slowly consolidated power over the last three decades as income and wealth have concentrated at the top. In the late 1970s the richest 1 percent of Americans received 9 percent of total income and held 18 percent of the nation's wealth; by 2007, they had more than 23 percent of total income and 35 percent of America's wealth. CEOs of the 1970s were paid 40 times the average worker's wage; now CEOs receive 300 times the typical workers' wage.

This concentration of income and wealth has generated the political heft to deregulate Wall Street and halve top tax rates. It has bankrolled the so-called Tea Party movement, and captured the House of Representatives and many state governments. Through a sequence of presidential appointments it has also overtaken the Supreme Court.

More

Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it.
Edmund Burke
 
That's an absolutely correct conclusion about the right wing of the Republican party. Conservatism is, by definition, conserving the status quo. A true conservative see's no need for radical changes. It would be more correct to call those on the far right, and their plutocrat masters, as being political reactionaries. It's unfortunate that they only represent about 10 to 15% of the voting public but have effectively dissabled representative government in our country.

I have been particulary amazed at how the right has succesfully used divisive wedge issues to get large numbers of people to vote against their own economic interest. Simply amazing what has happened to the modern Republican party. I do indeed miss the days of Rockefeller Republicanism.
 
Last edited:
The article to which you link describes a fundamental war going on in America since its founding. I also beleive that there is a fundamental war, but I it being waged between those who see the united states as a federation of republics and those who see the united states as an empire.

Small "r" republican self-governance can only truly work in a human scale commonwealth. When the people are separated from their representatives, the representatives become captured by the interested of consolidation and power. When the sovereignty of the people is delegated to a legislature that is hundreds of miles away, the citizen may as well not exist. Lobbyists, faction, and special interests will become more important to the government than reponding to their constituents. A representative's constituents should number in the hundreds, not in the millions.

The downside to small republics is that they may be militarily vulnerable to attack by larger states. The solution to this problem is federation, which was the course chosen in forming our union. But a federation that attempts to act like a mega republic will become a mega empire, and the massive concentration of centralized power will attract faction and special interest. The rulers of this mega empire will bestow favors on their mega cronies, handing the sovereignty of the people to the top 1% or the top .1%.

An empire is an aristocracy factory, as power and wealth are sucked from the far reaches, consolidated, and handed out by the imperial congress to its cronies.

As a proponent of republian self-governance, I will always advocate in favor of distributed power in the hands of the people rather than consolidated power in the hands of a central authority. Whether that central authority is right or left, it is contrary to human-scale people-centered governance.
 
That's an absolutely correct conclusion about the right wing of the Republican party. Conservatism is, by definition, conserving the status quo. A true conservative see's no need for radical changes. It would be more correct to call those on the far right, and their plutocrat masters, as being political reactionaries. It's unfortunate that they only represent about 10 to 15% of the voting public but have effectively dissabled representative government in our country.

I have been particulary amazed at how the right has succesfully used divisive wedge issues to get large numbers of people to vote against their own economic interest. Simply amazing what has happened to the modern Republican party. I do indeed miss the days of Rockefeller Republicanism.

When I was in high school, I think this was 10th grade, but could possibly have been 11th, I sat close enough to this fat kid who was friends with this exceptionally pimply kid to hear their conversations. I will never forget the pimply kid telling the fat kid that some girl, he used her name, was "really nice" and was so nice that "she'll like give you a blow job if you want one, she's really cool". I remember snickering to my young self. Even then I knew this kid wasn't getting blow jobs on demand from some girl. But the fat kid sat in rapt admiration. He believed it. And I remember I thought "everyone needs to feel superior to someone". That pimply kid could take ten minutes out of his miserable high school life to impress someone even lower in the high school caste system than he was.

Everyone needs to feel superior to someone.

It was years later before I realized just how clever of an observation I had made. It explains a great deal of life, and it explains the mystery you outline in your post. The lower you are on the socio-economic scale, the more urgent your need to feel superior. The MOGW are not stupid and they are excellent and manipulating this need in a large part of the masses. So you can get some idiot working three jobs to stay alive taking a picture of himself holding a sign that he's part of "the 53%" and posting it on the internet. Now, he's superior to someone, and he also has his picture on the internet. That's why I call those people useful idiots. Cause they are.
 
Progressives believe in openness, equal opportunity, and tolerance.
this is such total bullshit. 'progressives' only believe those things when they coincide with their own ideas. Conservatives are no different either.
 
Back
Top