Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
LOL
if we take out the parenthetical it is clear you're lying or retarded
that comma is unequivocal.....really....you're retarded or a liar...which one?
CBO Finds 3.7 Million Jobs Created by Stimulus
- Thread starter Bonestorm
- Start date
LOL
if we take out the parenthetical it is clear you're lying or retarded
that comma is unequivocal.....really....you're retarded or a liar...which one?
LOL - whatever. I said I can't be too bothered with it. The paranthetical does create separation, at least conversationally, but if you want to go all grammar police on it and call it retarded, fine.
I had specific posters in mind w/ the "no jobs" thought. You weren't one of them. You're just one of the idiots who keeps saying/implying that it failed.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
no it does not in this case, as you only had it for his claim about the black hole....the comma was AFTER the parenthetical, thus, you grouped me with the others. your logic the sentence reads:
yurt, bravo.......separate....GL...thus you said nothing about me idiot
retard....no wonder you think everyone else but you has reading comprehension problems, you don't even know how to properly structure a simple sentence
Well, I didn't want to be too vigorous in the defense, but you're also ignoring the context of how your name is mentioned.
You really don't read things very well.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
seriously? so you want me to believe i was separate from the rest of the sentence? then you said nothing about me idiot.
Oh, not just you. You,
that is separating me from the rest of the sentence
:lol:
That's awesome. Here's a chart. SF thinks we were better off at the end of 2008 than we are now. Why does anyone take him seriously?
Prior to the stimulus, the United States experienced the worst quarter of economic contraction since 1958.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
And what does that show? That I'm characterizing the other posters who took the position that you, bravs & GL did as having argued that the stimulus created no jobs.
It's pretty simple. Lovin' the stubborn refusal to comprehend, though...
I expect that your inability to answer this one was the cause of the 2 page grammar distraction, btw.
Wanna give it a go?
IMO it is a failed program, it was never the stated goal of the program to keep things the same, in fact it promised a much better result.
He gets upset when I point out that it failed, and thinks that this will prove me wrong. However, we still look at the 9.1% unemployment rate, with an actual rate of around 18%, our money buys less (even fast food) and only the fact that our homes have gone down in value so much keeps us from hearing about the inflation. This was definitely not the goal of this "stimulus". Pretending this was a resounding success is ridiculous.
So, now if he comes in and tries to say, "I don't think it was a resounding success, only that it didn't work well..." he pretty much is saying the same thing I am without simply admitting it failed to do what it was sold to us for...
2.8 million jobs(maybe)costing taxpayers 787 BILLION....whats that.?? about 245,000 dollars per job.....what a fuckin' bargain....haha
What a joke.....no wonder its called the jackass party....gullible in the extreme...
It promised to create & save jobs, and it did.
I guess you heard the "this will fix the economy and hire back everyone who was laid off" promise somewhere...
If Obama spent 787 billion dollars and claimed it created 2 fuckin' jobs you would be kissing his ass and telling us how successful he is......
It just don't work that way pinhead.....two jobs is not something to brag about but I agree, it is creating jobs...so you got a technical win....goodie for U
It just don't work that way pinhead.....two jobs is not something to brag about but I agree, it is creating jobs...so you got a technical win....goodie for U
Which is it, bravs...2 jobs, or the 2.8 million you mentioned in your previous post?
Big difference there in economic impact. Not sure if you're aware of that.
Either way, you get a technical win......245,000 per job is a ridiculous ripoff for the tax payers....assuming those numbers have a validity at all.....personally, even if true, it was wasted money, a failure,......245,000 per job is just a stupid waste of our taxes......and if the figure is closer to 1.8 million jobs, its even a worse failure....
Either way, you'll still be kissing his ass hoping he'll turn around.
Last edited:
And claiming that jobs were 'saved' is just nonsense.....fanciful imaginary pie in the sky fabrication of something that can't possible be calculated.....
There is no way to know what MIGHT have been in a hypothetical case of no or more or less stimulus....but if it floats your boat, and gives you an orgasm, have a ball.....
There is no way to know what MIGHT have been in a hypothetical case of no or more or less stimulus....but if it floats your boat, and gives you an orgasm, have a ball.....