We need to nominate, then elect Herman Cain!

poet said:
LOLOL. People don't "turn gay", Neanderthal. And I've never been sexually frustrated. LOL. I've been with several women....all who wanted more. Of me.
Click to expand...
You already told us that you made a choice and liked franks and beans better than clams and raisins. You can't take that back. You turned gay.
 
DamnYankee said:
You already told us that you made a choice and liked franks and beans better than clams and raisins. You can't take that back. You turned gay.
Click to expand...

I believe I was born gay, and it reinforced by nature, nurture and experience. Young male children "experiment" with other male children, but go on to mature into heterosexual males. Others differentiate into gay males. Sexual orientation is not "of choice". You believing that it is, allows you to "point fingers", and declare yourself "better" than gay people, because you believe them to have made "a poor choice". Self-aggrandizement.
 
DamnYankee said:
There's your fantasy about me rearing up again. I already told you that I don't play for the wrong team. :palm:
Click to expand...

Honey, not mine but yours. Who suggested sexual innuendo? Why would you even go there? Sooner or later, you'll get it through your head that I'm faithful and true to my partner of 10 years. Ain't cheated yet, and if I did, it wouldn't be with you. But, girl, keep on trying...somebody will take the bait. I think.
 
charver said:
Now there's a guarantee of electoral success.
Click to expand...
Onceler said:
It's my understanding that Cain supports making abortion illegal even in the case of rape.

So, he won't be the nominee.
Click to expand...
Jarod said:
Cain will not be the nominee. Im willing to bet if someone comes up with an acceptable bet.
Click to expand...
Oh look, Cain's still surging in the polls.

Fueled by Tea Party supporters, conservatives and high-interest GOP primary voters, former Godfather’s Pizza CEO Herman Cain now leads the race for the Republican presidential nomination, according to the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.
Click to expand...
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/44881...sj-poll-cain-now-leads-gop-pack/#.TpboSrJ49O9
 
As someone else pointed out in another thread, Fred Thompsons was leading in the polls around the same point last time round.
 
charver said:
As someone else pointed out in another thread, Fred Thompsons was leading in the polls around the same point last time round.
Click to expand...
Fred wasn't running at this point last time around. He got into the race too late and never mounted a serious candidacy. There's no comparison whatsoever with Cain. :)
 
DamnYankee said:
Fred wasn't running at this point last time around. He got into the race too late and never mounted a serious candidacy. There's no comparison whatsoever with Cain. :)
Click to expand...

He was still leading in the polls though.

If you want to go with polling now then you do that. Those people who liked the person leading the polls last month can go with that candidate. Hasn't every candidate got a poll they can point to as proving that it is them, above all others, who is going to be the big winner?

Anyway, get back to me when Cains in being sworn in, SM.
 
charver said:
He was still leading in the polls though.

If you want to go with polling now then you do that. Those people who liked the person leading the polls last month can go with that candidate. Hasn't every candidate got a poll they can point to as proving that it is them, above all others, who is going to be the big winner?

Anyway, get back to me when Cains in being sworn in, SM.
Click to expand...

Again, its not a valid comparison at all. Fred was popular because he was well-known and a straight talker. He eventually got in because of the popularity, but never ran an effective campaign. Cain was a nobody until we saw him debate with the establishment, and he gets more popular the more we see him. He got in early and has been building an effective campaign ever since. Fred was aloof and non-specific on issues; Cain is direct and has specific proposals like the 999 Plan.

Stick with what you do best, the irreverent bottom-of-the-beer-mug remarks. Save the political analysis for the grown-ups. :)
 
Onceler said:
LOL...who said he wouldn't be this week?

He's the flavor of the month. He might even win Iowa. But, he'll get trounced badly in NH, and then fade very fast as primary voters - many of them independents - think electability...
Click to expand...

You also said "It's my understanding that Cain supports making abortion illegal even in the case of rape." and was wrong about that. :)
 
Dixie said:
Their is no "religious test" and qualification for a cabinet position, is determined by the president, pursuant to the Constitution. What part of that do you not comprehend? He is not bound to appoint anyone by any other standard than his own personal judgement. I don't know why you are acting like such a retard about this, Jughead. You fake being a lawyer enough to know, if the president were somehow bound by an obligation to make appointments based on not discriminating, he could never make an appointment. This is a decision our Constitution grants the President, and his decision alone. If we don't like his methods, if we don't like how he went about appointing people, we can vote him out of office. But Article 6 simply does not apply to presidential appointments, and the president is certainly not obligated in any way, to observe ANY outside influence, or satisfy political correctness.

Remember now, we are not talking about a situation where various "candidates" are applying for a job... That isn't how presidential appointments are made. It's not like the President is going to have to interview applicants and hire them for the job... the PRESIDENT appoints his cabinet. He decides who is a candidate, and who is not a candidate. He is not bound or obligated to make that decision with consideration for religious beliefs or anything else, he can appoint any damn one he chooses, and for any damn reason he sees fit. End of discussion.
Click to expand...

Dixie, the United States Constitution says differently, it says he cannot use a Religous test, and thats exactly what Cain said he would do. If the president says, "I will not appoint a Christian, Muslim or any other religen to offices in the United States", he is violating the Constitution.
 
DamnYankee said:
You also said "It's my understanding that Cain supports making abortion illegal even in the case of rape." and was wrong about that. :)
Click to expand...

That's his position, DY. Like I said, he can win Iowa with his social stances, but he won't be around for the duration.

I love the pipe dream, though. *shrug*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top