What's Bloomberg smoking?

Here's a chart on average salaries of folks in the securities industry in NYC as compared to the average salaries in the rest of the private sector:

economix-11securities-custom1.jpg



I'm still voting banana peels.
 
Bloomberg is right for once. These 'kids' are protesting nothing other than society not continuing to give them the silver spoon they are used to from their helicopter parents.

Obviously you didn't comprehend what I wrote, Annie. Let me try again: the people who work on Wall St. that make from $40 to $50 grand a year ARE NOT THE PEOPLE WHO MAKE THE DECISIONS, TRADES OR POLICIES ON THE STOCK MARKET OR TRADING FLOOR OF WALL ST. It is the latter of whom the the Wall St. Occupiers are protesting...the management that decides to outsouce jobs, to put toxic financial packets on the international market to be sold, to downsize the workforce and then claim record profits, to lose peoples retirement packages on their gambles...and the traders who gladly support such actions ( a trader starts around $80K).

Limbaugh is just a mouthpiece for the very folks that screwed people like YOU over, Annie....you should stop parroting his bilge and do some honest research yourself. The "kids" (young, old, all races, creeds and colors) are the people who went to school, got the grades and the training, and then graduated into a dead economy...they're too smart to swallow the bilge that if the rich and connnected screw up the economy, it's up to the guys making $40-$50K (or LESS) to make up the difference by accepting lower salaries, giving up medical benefits and having their jobs outsourced to Asia and South America.

Bloomberg is just talking out of his ass...because his Bloomberg News corporation sure as hell has NOT been a major employer in the NYC area.
 
Reading comprehension problems, I see.

No sweetheart, she's pointing out what YOU wrote...which is A-typical of willfully ignorant neocon parrots and toadies. Since this thing has started, folk like YOU Annie have desparately searched for group anarchy, violence, etc. But lacking that, you focus in on the ONE jackass in 4 weeks, or you carrying on about the "silver spoon" kids (whom incidently do NOT make up the majority of this movement). As the FACTS show, these people are the EXCEPTION but NOT the rule.

Grow up, Annie. You parrot the Limbaugh swill, yet you don't have the courage to own up to your errors when pointed out.
 
Annie gets a gold star.....I've seen the troublemaking pinheads, trashing everything in their wake and getting arrested for their violence....I wouldn't hire one of those pigs to piss on TC's head if his hair was on fire.....
They don't have a clue as to why they are even there.....they're being paid to protest and carry factory made signs they don't understand...
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Finally, an honest response. But guess what, Damo...your good buddy is backing that "idiot" Bloomberg. So much for his "liberalism". But do continue to go in circles, Damo....God forbid you man up enough to do anything else as you grind that axe.


You are truly one of the most inane posters here... And YOU just couldn't help yourself but IGNORE the topic of discussion for the sole purpose of spewing some bogus rag about me throwing liberals under the bus for a disagreement. If I found someone that "inane" I just ignore or IA them. Seems you've got issues, Damo. Nobody is saying anything because the thread is boring, not because it is "so controversial" that they can't handle it. Oh PUH-LEEZE! Every blessed time you neocon/teabaggers can't defend your latest talking point/mantra, you all swear that the thread is boring and no one is saying anything of worth. Well then, what's YOUR excuse, Damo? You come here talking BS, and when caught, you STILL BS. Grow the fuck up, Damo! Admitting you're wrong on these boards won't kill you....I've done it, others have, so you're ego will survive.And again, for the incredibly slow... Read slowly so you can understand it: It is stupid to start hating somebody on your own side of most arguments because they disagree with you on one of them.

Damo, stop braying like a neocon/teabagger jackass. Once more for the cheap seats.....your buddy "The Dude" is just another fair weather "liberal" like you are.....the second your mental comfort zone is compromised, your "liberalism" goes out the window. Bottom line: "the Dude", like YOU, has defended key and crucial neocon/teabagger policies, talking points and mantras on more than one occasion. That the Dude defends the lies of Bloomberg is bad enough...that YOU use my pointing out his two faced BS as a "my way or the highway" attitude towards anyone who doesn't agree with me on any level just demonstrates how moronic your grudge against me is. The chronology of the post shows what I said and why...and how it took SEVERAL posts for YOU to actually state a position relevent to the subject title of this thread.

If you STILL don't get it, Damo, I'll dumb it down futher.....no "liberal" endorses LIES by conservatives. Liberals can disagree on policies, but they DON'T endorse the lies of the opposition. That's what the "Dude" did with Bloomberg. Got it now,bunky? Because if not, I'm not going to waste anymore time helping you grind that axe.
 
Here's a chart on average salaries of folks in the securities industry in NYC as compared to the average salaries in the rest of the private sector:

economix-11securities-custom1.jpg




I'm still voting banana peels.

Thanks for the documentation of what I have been trying to school our resident Bloomberg backing buffoons about.
 
Damo, stop braying like a neocon/teabagger jackass. Once more for the cheap seats.....your buddy "The Dude" is just another fair weather "liberal" like you are.....the second your mental comfort zone is compromised, your "liberalism" goes out the window. Bottom line: "the Dude", like YOU, has defended key and crucial neocon/teabagger policies, talking points and mantras on more than one occasion. That the Dude defends the lies of Bloomberg is bad enough...that YOU use my pointing out his two faced BS as a "my way or the highway" attitude towards anyone who doesn't agree with me on any level just demonstrates how moronic your grudge against me is. The chronology of the post shows what I said and why...and how it took SEVERAL posts for YOU to actually state a position relevent to the subject title of this thread.

If you STILL don't get it, Damo, I'll dumb it down futher.....no "liberal" endorses LIES by conservatives. Liberals can disagree on policies, but they DON'T endorse the lies of the opposition. That's what the "Dude" did with Bloomberg. Got it now,bunky? Because if not, I'm not going to waste anymore time helping you grind that axe.

I note you are still wasting your time on the attack. I knew there was a reason why I don't bother with you. Every once in a while I forget and talk to you, but it is always a waste of time.

Nobody cares what Bloomberg says because, save for one, nobody here has him for a mayor. Nobody cares about the occupiers, because we've watched them stupidly reject support from people like John Lewis.

It's like watching that video over again just reading one of these rants of yours, it's painful.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Damo, stop braying like a neocon/teabagger jackass. Once more for the cheap seats.....your buddy "The Dude" is just another fair weather "liberal" like you are.....the second your mental comfort zone is compromised, your "liberalism" goes out the window. Bottom line: "the Dude", like YOU, has defended key and crucial neocon/teabagger policies, talking points and mantras on more than one occasion. That the Dude defends the lies of Bloomberg is bad enough...that YOU use my pointing out his two faced BS as a "my way or the highway" attitude towards anyone who doesn't agree with me on any level just demonstrates how moronic your grudge against me is. The chronology of the post shows what I said and why...and how it took SEVERAL posts for YOU to actually state a position relevent to the subject title of this thread.

If you STILL don't get it, Damo, I'll dumb it down futher.....no "liberal" endorses LIES by conservatives. Liberals can disagree on policies, but they DON'T endorse the lies of the opposition. That's what the "Dude" did with Bloomberg. Got it now,bunky? Because if not, I'm not going to waste anymore time helping you grind that axe.


I note you are still wasting your time on the attack. I knew there was a reason why I don't bother with you. Every once in a while I forget and talk to you, but it is always a waste of time.

Nobody cares what Bloomberg says because, save for one, nobody here has him for a mayor. Nobody cares about the occupiers, because we've watched them stupidly reject support from people like John Lewis.

It's like watching that video over again just reading one of these rants of yours, it's painful.


What's lame is the excuse you use to try and hide your grudge.....like I said, you've gotta be a little nutty if you continually follow up someone you swear isn't worth the time of day...and if you are doing that just to make hay for your discussion board, then YOU are pretty pathetic...I mean, you've now devolved to the "nobody cares" defense of your bullshit?


Once again:

If you STILL don't get it, Damo, I'll dumb it down futher.....no "liberal" endorses LIES by conservatives. Liberals can disagree on policies, but they DON'T endorse the lies of the opposition. That's what the "Dude" did with Bloomberg. Got it now,bunky? Because if not, I'm not going to waste anymore time helping you grind that axe.

Grind on, Damo. I'm done indulging your stupidity on this thread. Catch you on the next axe grind. Carry on.
 
Back
Top