Define a 'Liberal' or a 'Conservative'

But the religion being discussed is Christianity, which like all of the world's major religions, considers your chosen lifestyle to be an abomination.

Your logical failures have been proven. You can't even address the points made anymore. :)

Ok. That's it.. I'm finding you annoying now, as nothing of substance is being presented. You have your own small-minded world view. To which you're entitled...but I don't have to subscribe to it. Begone.

P.S. All major religions have members that grapple with homosexuality...I'm come to terms with it. I'm sure many have as well. That you find it something to point fingers at, or to mock, or raise yourself up at our expense, shows how little, petty, and self-serving you are. You, thinking yourself better than anyone is the biggest laugh I've had today.
 
Ok. That's it.. I'm finding you annoying now, as nothing of substance is being presented. You have your own small-minded world view. To which you're entitled...but I don't have to subscribe to it. Begone.

P.S. All major religions have members that grapple with homosexuality...I'm come to terms with it. I'm sure many have as well. That you find it something to point fingers at, or to mock, or raise yourself up at our expense, shows how little, petty, and self-serving you are. You, thinking yourself better than anyone is the biggest laugh I've had today.

Why should you have to "grapple" with the issue if it's sanctioned by the Lord Himself, as you claim?

I sense a major pwnership by me yet again is in the wind with your threats to put me on ignore. How long will this next head-in-the-sand act last? :)
 
Liberal: government is the solution to most problems. Bigger is better.

Conservative: government is the problem in most instances. Should be constrained by constitution and acknowledge that smaller is better.
 
Liberal: government is the solution to most problems. Bigger is better.

Conservative: government is the problem in most instances. Should be constrained by constitution and acknowledge that smaller is better.

Generalizations are lazy, tune out Rush, think for yourself!
 
If Annie has ID as a cheer leader, sorry Annie you have to go on ignore, it keeps the peace around here. So, you won't have to not care, anymore, but it must have bothered you enough to mention it!
 
But the religion being discussed is Christianity, which like all of the world's major religions, considers your chosen lifestyle to be an abomination.

Your logical failures have been proven. You can't even address the points made anymore. :)

You are right in that Christianity is one of the world's major (in terms of adherents) religions. Where you err is in your understanding of it. You are, possibly, one of the most intolerant (Jesus preached tolerance), bigoted (jesus said love your neighbour) and unchristian people it has ever been my misfortune to come across. Your idea of christianity is certainly NOT among the world's major philosophies. Your sense of spirituality is flawed in almost every aspect you have attempted to share on this forum. You are, sir, in a minority. You do not speak for any majority nor do you speak for any spiritual entity save that of your own invention.
You are, basically, a rather nasty human being with a very limited knowledge of people and a scant understanding of any life but your own.
I do not know your age nor your background but I would say, should you wish to listen, that you would be greatly improved by trying to understand man and his relationship to his fellows and his home (this planet).
I wish you nothing but the best should you heed that advice.
 
You are right in that Christianity is one of the world's major (in terms of adherents) religions. Where you err is in your understanding of it. You are, possibly, one of the most intolerant (Jesus preached tolerance), bigoted (jesus said love your neighbour) and unchristian people it has ever been my misfortune to come across. Your idea of christianity is certainly NOT among the world's major philosophies. Your sense of spirituality is flawed in almost every aspect you have attempted to share on this forum. You are, sir, in a minority. You do not speak for any majority nor do you speak for any spiritual entity save that of your own invention.
You are, basically, a rather nasty human being with a very limited knowledge of people and a scant understanding of any life but your own.
I do not know your age nor your background but I would say, should you wish to listen, that you would be greatly improved by trying to understand man and his relationship to his fellows and his home (this planet).
I wish you nothing but the best should you heed that advice.

This is merely a deflection technique, a long string of hateful unsubstantiated accusations and assumptions to elicit a defensive posture, since you cannot refute my logical arguments, but aren't man enough to admit defeat. :)
 
This is merely a deflection technique, a long string of hateful unsubstantiated accusations and assumptions to elicit a defensive posture, since you cannot refute my logical arguments, but aren't man enough to admit defeat. :)

Oh, the accusations are indeed substantiated.
You may want to look in a mirror.
 
This is merely a deflection technique, a long string of hateful unsubstantiated accusations and assumptions to elicit a defensive posture, since you cannot refute my logical arguments, but aren't man enough to admit defeat. :)

I am sorry, you strange little man, but I have no idea what you are talking about. It's getting late and the only thing I can think of is the fool you made of yourself over English grammar. Are you still wittering on about that? Can you not accept defeat like a man?
There were no hateful or unsubstantiated accusations in that post. You ARE a rather nasty person, you DO have an unchristian view of your fellow man and you DO need to better understand your fellow man and the place we all call home.
I appreciate an argument but, on the rare occasion that I have been proved wrong, I will accept the fact and not try to spin like a naughty ten year old. You are not worth bothering about and I am getting close to putting you in the ignore box with the other two residents of your institution.
 
I am sorry, you strange little man, but I have no idea what you are talking about. It's getting late and the only thing I can think of is the fool you made of yourself over English grammar. Are you still wittering on about that? Can you not accept defeat like a man?
There were no hateful or unsubstantiated accusations in that post. You ARE a rather nasty person, you DO have an unchristian view of your fellow man and you DO need to better understand your fellow man and the place we all call home.
I appreciate an argument but, on the rare occasion that I have been proved wrong, I will accept the fact and not try to spin like a naughty ten year old. You are not worth bothering about and I am getting close to putting you in the ignore box with the other two residents of your institution.
Repeating the same long string of hateful unsubstantiated accusations and assumptions doesn't substantiate them. Try again. :)
 
Repeating the same long string of hateful unsubstantiated accusations and assumptions doesn't substantiate them. Try again. :)

Oh, what a hypocrite, as that is exactly what you have done here, ad nauseam. So it's ok when you do it, but not ok when others do it?
Don't ask for that which you are unwilling or unable to present, yourself. Lowaicue, ignore this girl. She's not well.
 
Here.

"Liberal: government is the solution to most problems. Bigger is better."

? In a thread where one is asked to define something you get upset when somebody does? Tell us a contrary definition, don't pretend that it is "labeling" and therefore bad. It was simply Annie participating in the actual conversation.

Words mean things, including liberal. What does liberal mean to you?
 
? In a thread where one is asked to define something you get upset when somebody does? Tell us a contrary definition, don't pretend that it is "labeling" and therefore bad. It was simply Annie participating in the actual conversation.

Words mean things, including liberal. What does liberal mean to you?

I think it would be more interesting if you define the word.
 
Back
Top