Did a JPP rightie attend last night's Obama fundraiser?

[Guns Guns Guns]

A bearded man standing in the front row near the stage shouted, “Jesus Christ is the son of God!”


A pool reporter covering the event said the heckler also yelled, “Christian God is the one and only true living God, the creator of heaven and the universe!”




http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...undraiser/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS

​

Now let the Tea-rorists start decrying the "brutality and repressiveness of the Obama storm troopers", or theorizing that the nutbag was a liberal trying to discredit the right.



Since Obama mistook a girls' jacket for Mister Christians', Blabo has another gaffe for his collection. Poor Blabo.

 

[Damocles]

A bearded man standing in the front row near the stage shouted, “Jesus Christ is the son of God!”


A pool reporter covering the event said the heckler also yelled, “Christian God is the one and only true living God, the creator of heaven and the universe!”




http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...undraiser/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS

​

Now let the Tea-rorists start decrying the "brutality and repressiveness of the Obama storm troopers", or theorizing that the nutbag was a liberal trying to discredit the right.



Since Obama mistook a girls' jacket for Mister Christians', Blabo has another gaffe for his collection. Poor Blabo.

Wait... According to some on this site, because there is a Democrat on stage, the heckler must be a Democrat. Why are Christian Democrats calling Obama the Anti-Christ?

<- NOTE FOR THE SARCASM IMPAIRED, THIS WINKY DENOTES THAT THE PRECEDING POST WAS SARCASM.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Wait... According to some on this site, because there is a Democrat on stage, the heckler must be a Democrat. Why are Christian Democrats calling Obama the Anti-Christ? <- NOTE FOR THE SARCASM IMPAIRED, THIS WINKY DENOTES THAT THE PRECEDING POST WAS SARCASM.

The people that you theorized were liberals at the GOP debates weren't heckling, were they?


They were expressing feelings widely shared by Tea-rorists (and apparently not very repugnant to the Republican candidates).


I'm surprised that someone who perfoms your awesome due diligence on most posts didn't spot that flaw in your sad "joke".

 

[Damocles]

The people that you theorized were liberals at the GOP debates weren't heckling, were they?

It depends at whom you think the "heckling" was aimed. And I only theorized a possibility, not a certainty. I also find it interesting that out of over 6000 in attendance so few had a reaction you claim is pandemic among a certain group...

They were expressing feelings widely shared by Tea-rorists (and apparently not very repugnant to the Republican candidates).

Evidence from the actual debate attendance shows that they aren't "widely held" by anybody attending that debate, so few reacted it shows that an extreme minority of those in attendance held those "feelings"...

I'm surprised that someone who perfoms(sic) your awesome due diligence on most posts didn't spot that flaw in your sad "joke".

I'm "surprised" (note for the sarcasm impaired left: the quote marks here denotes further sarcasm) that you took the post so seriously after a clear indication that it was sarcasm.

 

[Alias]

The people that you theorized were liberals at the GOP debates weren't heckling, were they?


They were expressing feelings widely shared by Tea-rorists (and apparently not very repugnant to the Republican candidates).


I'm surprised that someone who perfoms your awesome due diligence on most posts didn't spot that flaw in your sad "joke".

Well that makes sense......call American citizens terrorists for simply opposing the President's policies. That's really really smart. You think that's a sound campaign srategy?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

It depends at whom you think the "heckling" was aimed. And I only theorized a possibility, not a certainty. I also find it interesting that out of over 6000 in attendance so few had a reaction you claim is pandemic among a certain group... .

I think the GOP debate applause and booing were aimed at uninsured people dying, condemned prisoners, and a gay soldier.


I accurately stated that you were 'theorizing'. Indeed, theorizing means you were speculating about a possibility, not a certainty. Thanks for pointing that out for your friends on the right, some of whom seem unfamiliar with many aspects of the English language, particularly multi-syllabic terms. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/theorizing


1. I don't recall using 'pandemic' or any therapuetic terminology, so I'm not sure why you included it in your attempt to deny that the majority of Tea-rorrists are in favor of repealing what they call "Obamacare".

2. I also believe a majority of Tea-rorrists are in favor of capital punishment. Do you disagree?

3. I think it's safe to say that most Tea-rorists opposed the repeal of DADT, too. Are you pretending otherwise?

Evidence from the actual debate attendance shows that they aren't "widely held" by anybody attending that debate, so few reacted it shows that an extreme minority of those in attendance held those "feelings"....

What evidence is that? Present it.

Barring that, maybe you should attempt to listen to and watch video of each incident again. When you come up with a precise number of applauders/booers vs those opposed to the applause/booing, let me know. Otherwise, I stand by the three points above.

I'm "surprised" (note for the sarcasm impaired left: the quote marks here denotes further sarcasm) that you took the post so seriously after a clear indication that it was sarcasm.

Who says I did? Perhaps my sarcasm is subtler than your sarcasm.


After all, it seems very handy to claim "I was only kidding" if a gambit goes wrong.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Well that makes sense......call American citizens terrorists for simply opposing the President's policies. That's really really smart. You think that's a sound campaign srategy?

"Tea-rorists." Learn to read.

 

[Damocles]

I think the GOP debate applause and booing were aimed at uninsured people dying, condemned prisoners, and a gay soldier.


I accurately stated that you were 'theorizing'. Indeed, theorizing means you were speculating about a possibility, not a certainty. Thanks for pointing that out for your friends on the right, some of whom seem unfamiliar with many aspects of the English language, particularly multi-syllabic terms. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/theorizing


1. I don't recall using 'pandemic' or any therapuetic terminology, so I'm not sure why you included it in your attempt to deny that the majority of Tea-rorrists are in favor of repealing what they call "Obamacare".


2. I also believe a majority of Tea-rorrists are in favor of capital punishment. Do you disagree?

3. I think it's safe to say that most Tea-rorists opposed the repeal of DADT, too. Are you pretending otherwise?



What evidence is that? Present it.

The clear and evident extreme minority who "felt" that way were the ones who you theorize were booing the soldier. Had the "majority" felt that way, there would have been a reason to say that the audience actually booed rather than like two guys sitting behind the dude who was moderating...

Barring that, maybe you should attempt to listen to and watch video of each incident again. When you come up with a precise number of applauders/booers vs those opposed to the applause/booing, let me know. Otherwise, I stand by the three points above.

Right. You should do that. Study, see how many of the over 6,000 people in attendance were booing.

Who says I did? Perhaps my sarcasm is subtler than your sarcasm.


After all, it seems very handy to claim "I was only kidding" if a gambit goes wrong.

Right. You should do that, we'll all believe you.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

\\\legion's/// logic:

if it makes republicans or those on the right look bad, then no doubt they are republicans or on the right

if it makes democrats or those on the left look bad, then there could be doubt they are democrats.

little bit of truth in humor?

 

[RockX]

:lol:

So the liberals booed Jesus Christ.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

So you agree that the majority of Tea-rorists are in favor of repealing what they call "Obamacare", and a majority of Tea-rorrists are in favor of capital punishment, and most Tea-rorists opposed the repeal of DADT?

That means the majority of Tea-rorists at least tacitly support the sentiments expressed by audience members who applauded allowing the uninsured to die, Perrys' body count, and those in attendance who booed a US soldier who is serving his nation in harms' way.