Support an Independent Palestine? Sign petition now!

Superfreak said:
You do realize that Muhammad was a direct descendant of Abraham... Jesus was not.
Click to expand...

LOL. Muhammed is a descendent of Abraham through Ishmael and Jesus is a descendant of Abraham through Isaac. Be careful. You're obviously in over your head here.
 
Alias said:
LOL. Muhammed is a descendent of Abraham through Ishmael and Jesus is a descendant of Abraham through Isaac. Be careful. You're obviously in over your head here.
Click to expand...

Morons. Either you believe Jesus was immaculately conceived or you believe he is a direct descendant of Abraham. He cannot be both. You are not someone's direct descendant by adoption.
 
Alias said:
Abraham had two sons, Isaac and Ishmael.
Click to expand...

Which doesn't change the FACT that it was Joseph and not Mary that was a descendant of Isaac. That means JOSEPH was a descendant.... not Jesus. Unless you are here to tell us Jesus was conceived not immaculately but rather by Joseph???
 
Superfreak said:
Which doesn't change the FACT that it was Joseph and not Mary that was a descendant of Isaac. That means JOSEPH was a descendant.... not Jesus. Unless you are here to tell us Jesus was conceived not immaculately but rather by Joseph???
Click to expand...

Who was Mary descended from?
 
Alias said:
All you bible scholars will notice that there are two genalogies, one in Luke and one in Matthew. Luke takes the line from Adam and Matthew starts with Abraham. The reason is one is of man and the other is of the King and the covenant God made with Abraham. Jesus is man and King. This will help explain it for you bible scholars.

http://christianity.about.com/od/biblefactsandlists/a/jesusgenealogy.htm
Click to expand...

Do show us where it is that Luke is referring to Mary and not Joseph. Luke mentions Mary by name in many accounts. Yet somehow when discussing the geneaology he doesn't
?
 
Superfreak said:
A whore?
Click to expand...

I think we are seeing a meltdown here, folks. You shouldn't jump into something you're not equipped to handle. You'd be better off staying silent and staying out of it rather than allowing your arrogant ignorance force you to continually make a public fool of yourself.
 
Alias said:
I think we are seeing a meltdown here, folks. You shouldn't jump into something you're not equipped to handle. You'd be better off staying silent and staying out of it rather than allowing your arrogant ignorance force you to continually make a public fool of yourself.
Click to expand...

Yes you would retard.
 
Yurt said:
Quran 2:59

But those who wronged changed [those words] to a statement other than that which had been said to them, so We sent down upon those who wronged a punishment from the sky because they were defiantly disobeying.

is islam bigoted supertweak?
Click to expand...

whats the matter SF? afraid to deal with reality?
 
Superfreak said:
Do show us where it is that Luke is referring to Mary and not Joseph. Luke mentions Mary by name in many accounts. Yet somehow when discussing the geneaology he doesn't
?
Click to expand...

"You will recall, Nathan and Solomon were both the sons of David. Nathan was the older brother of Solomon, but when David died the younger brother took the throne. Nathan’s line ran on through the ages and ultimately produced the Virgin Mary. Solomon’s line ran down through the centuries and ultimately produced Joseph. Matthew is careful to inform us that Joseph was not the father of Jesus, but that he was the husband of Mary, to whom was born Jesus (1:16). And Luke uses a word for a son that includes what we should call a son-in-law. "

http://www.abideinchrist.com/selah/dec23.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top