poet
Banned
No dick, Alias. Zip. Nada. Pencil. Need a microscope to find it. What up?
Rep Paul Ryan's freedom of silence
- Thread starter Bfgrn
- Start date
No dick, Alias. Zip. Nada. Pencil. Need a microscope to find it. What up?
icedancer2theend
Verified User
None of the following has occurred in this thread~
Last update: January 26, 2011
Link
PLEASE NOTE: The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) serves state legislators and their staff. This site provides comparative information only and should not be construed as legal advice. NCSL cannot provide assistance with individual cases.
Overview
Many states have enacted "cyberstalking" or "cyberharassment" laws or have laws that explicitly include electronic forms of communication within more traditional stalking or harassment laws. In addition, recent concerns about protecting minors from online bullying or harassment have led states to enact "cyberbullying" laws. This chart identifies only state laws that include specific references to electronic communication. However, other state laws may still apply to those who harass, threaten or bully others online, although specific language may make the laws easier to enforce. This chart classifies the various state laws addressing these three different types of online behaviors, as described below.
Cyberstalking. Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet, email or other electronic communications to stalk, and generally refers to a pattern of threatening or malicious behaviors. Cyberstalking may be considered the most dangerous of the three types of Internet harassment, based on a posing credible threat of harm. Sanctions range from misdemeanors to felonies.
Cyberharassment. Cyberharassment differs from cyberstalking in that it is generally defined as not involving a credible threat. Cyberharassment usually pertains to threatening or harassing email messages, instant messages, or to blog entries or websites dedicated solely to tormenting an individual. Some states approach cyberharrassment by including language addressing electronic communications in general harassment statutes, while others have created stand-alone cyberharassment statutes.
Cyberbullying. Cyberbullying and cyberharassment are sometimes used interchangeably, but for the purposes of this chart, cyberbullying is used for electronic harassment or bullying among minors within a school context. Recent cyberbullying legislation reflects a trend of makaing school districts the policy enforcers of such misconduct. As a result, statutes establish the infrastructure for schools to handle this issue by amending existing school anti-bullying policies to include cyberbullying or electronic harassment among school age children. The majority of these state laws establish sanctions for all forms of cyberbullying on school property, school busses and official school functions. However, some have also extended sanctions to include cyberbullying activities that originate off-campus, believing that activities off-campus can have a chilling and disruptive effect on children's learning environment. The sanctions for cyberbullying range from school/parent interventions to misdemeanors and felonies with detention, suspension, and expulsion in between. Some of these laws promote Internet safety education or curricula that covers cyberbullying.
See also: Additional NCSL cyberbullying resources, state laws related to electronic solicitation or luring of children, Internet filtering laws--schools and libraries, and NCSL LegisBrief: Protecting Children Online.
Last update: January 26, 2011
Link
PLEASE NOTE: The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) serves state legislators and their staff. This site provides comparative information only and should not be construed as legal advice. NCSL cannot provide assistance with individual cases.
Overview
Many states have enacted "cyberstalking" or "cyberharassment" laws or have laws that explicitly include electronic forms of communication within more traditional stalking or harassment laws. In addition, recent concerns about protecting minors from online bullying or harassment have led states to enact "cyberbullying" laws. This chart identifies only state laws that include specific references to electronic communication. However, other state laws may still apply to those who harass, threaten or bully others online, although specific language may make the laws easier to enforce. This chart classifies the various state laws addressing these three different types of online behaviors, as described below.
Cyberstalking. Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet, email or other electronic communications to stalk, and generally refers to a pattern of threatening or malicious behaviors. Cyberstalking may be considered the most dangerous of the three types of Internet harassment, based on a posing credible threat of harm. Sanctions range from misdemeanors to felonies.
Cyberharassment. Cyberharassment differs from cyberstalking in that it is generally defined as not involving a credible threat. Cyberharassment usually pertains to threatening or harassing email messages, instant messages, or to blog entries or websites dedicated solely to tormenting an individual. Some states approach cyberharrassment by including language addressing electronic communications in general harassment statutes, while others have created stand-alone cyberharassment statutes.
Cyberbullying. Cyberbullying and cyberharassment are sometimes used interchangeably, but for the purposes of this chart, cyberbullying is used for electronic harassment or bullying among minors within a school context. Recent cyberbullying legislation reflects a trend of makaing school districts the policy enforcers of such misconduct. As a result, statutes establish the infrastructure for schools to handle this issue by amending existing school anti-bullying policies to include cyberbullying or electronic harassment among school age children. The majority of these state laws establish sanctions for all forms of cyberbullying on school property, school busses and official school functions. However, some have also extended sanctions to include cyberbullying activities that originate off-campus, believing that activities off-campus can have a chilling and disruptive effect on children's learning environment. The sanctions for cyberbullying range from school/parent interventions to misdemeanors and felonies with detention, suspension, and expulsion in between. Some of these laws promote Internet safety education or curricula that covers cyberbullying.
See also: Additional NCSL cyberbullying resources, state laws related to electronic solicitation or luring of children, Internet filtering laws--schools and libraries, and NCSL LegisBrief: Protecting Children Online.
Bfgrn
New member
I think you replied to the wrong thread...
icedancer2theend
Verified User
I think you'd be mistaken.
Actually they aren't. They are just against socialism as the only solution. We've spent at least two years speaking of this, I've given you different ideas and said this in many different ways. You continue to deliberately ignore things to project what you "think" onto others.
I will say again that this says more about you than it does about "them"... You either have no empathic ability or you are deliberately disingenuous. You think you do because you feel "sorry" for people you think are denied, but are incapable of actually placing yourself into the shoes of another that may have a different opinion and who believe that government may not be the right solution to every human problem.
Your empathy is broken, just feeling sorry for people isn't all of empathy nor is it enough to actually come up with a solution that is different than what is already caving under the weight of debt in other nations.
Bfgrn
New member
This thread has NOTHING to do with cyber-bullying.
icedancer2theend
Verified User
Yes, it did. It was introduced by damo a few pages back. But if you have a need to have the last word on the matter go for it.
You don't know what I deleted, and really need to let it go. At least in the aspect of whether it occurred or not... Without all the pieces of information you may simply be wrong...
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Awww, poor widdle Tempie is all pissed because I've (once again) demonstrated what a complete jackass and blowhard he is. If the little dummy wasn't on the dance card, then he wouldn't bother posting or responding to me or on my threads or to anyone doing likewise.
Watch Tempie (alias Freedumb, alias USFreedom911) dance folks. Dance, clown, dance!
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH; TaiBitchy obviously has his panties in a knot and the chronology of the posts show it
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
As the chronology of the posts shows, Neither Tempie (alias Freedumb, alias USFreedom911) or any of his like minded Ryan lackies could actually provided the link or quote from the "Ryan law" they swore justified the draconian methods used to silence the Gov. Ryan critic at the townhall meeting. The only person who did provide the information was Bfgrn...and that information clearly shows how full of it Tempie and his moronic cohorts are....they just drop names that they heard via their right wingnut blog sites, broadcasters and pundits without actually knowing the content.
But rather than just acknowledge his error, Tempie does EXACTLY like I said he would...bluff, bluster, lie and BS ad nauseum. Ever the clown, we can watch Tempie dance ever faster to have the last, repetitive word in that vein. I leave him to it.
Here you have it folks. The chronology of the posts show that TaiBitchy has no idea of what the Roberts Rules of Order mean or how they are used for meetings.
It is so sad that TaiBitchy is so ignorant.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
You can try to twist this any way you want; but the bottom line is:
1. The poster was disruptive at a meeting
2. He was asked to leave
3. He refused
4. There was then an attempt to escort him from the meeting
5. He resisted
6. He was then restrained
7. He was arrested
8. Your attempts to spin this has failed
9. The chronology of the posts show your failure
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Oh yeah, the local cops, of whom were promised exemption from Ryan's union busting tactics in return for their political endorsement.
The event was a "pay for view" town hall in which Neilsen had a PAID TICKET for....so some of the charges against him were bogus. Seems Ryan tried to pull a Reagan....meaning you have a controlled audience while trying to appear to the public as a forum open to random questions. So you can repeat your mantra until doomsday, SF, but in leiu of all the nonsense the teabaggers pulled at town halls (and were NOT arrested), I daresay that not only Ryan is a hypocrit, but so are his advocates.
And here we have it folks.
TaiBitchy is basing his entire premise on that it was an event to which tickets were sold and that since the idiot had a ticket, then he wasn't supposed to be removed.
I guess TaiBitchy thinks he can go buy a movie ticket, enter the movie, stand up and start shouting out the plot, and not be asked to leave.
Then when TaiBitchy refuses to leave, that he can't be arrested.
TaiBitchy is so naive.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
A memo from a TP group in Connecticut on how to disrupt meetings.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/docume...d-anti-reform-harrassment-strategy.php?page=1
While it talks about asking questions, when given the opportunity, nowhere does it say anything about distrupting the meetings.
But then, you overlooked that part.
Stupid-stupid Chrispie
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Leave it to you, to look for a dick on a cartoon character.
I also noticed that you missed that "Your Mom" has no vagina either; but then, you're not interested in "that"; HUH!!
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
poet
Banned
Uh, I didn't post the stupid, juvenile gif., did I? Ooops. That was you. LOL. Well, there you have it.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Libertarians are a fucking joke....always have been, always will be....and their poster boy here proves it once again!
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Hmmm, seems YOU are in denial of the FACT that the whole purpose is NOT to ask real, personal questions based on local concerns, but to be an attack dog and disruptive when the opportunity presents itself. Maybe next time you should go to the link and READ THE ENTIRE INFORMATION AVAILABLE before you spew the usual partisan hackery.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
The document is ten pages long. From page two, paragraph "Inside the Hall", 2nd bullet point:
The level of denial and hypocrisy by our resident teabagger/neocon/libertarian toadies is astonishing! They demononize one guy at a Ryan meeting but readily accept directions for teabaggers to disrupt town halls by Dem....they don't even deal with the FACT that disruptive teabaggers were NOT cop slammed, but one guy wanting an hones answer was. Hell, Mitt Romney at least dealt straight up with people who were NOT his supporters....and succeeded in continuing his address, Q&A. Give the man credit where credit is due despite my disagreement with his ideology.
Ryan is a POS who will be recalled next year.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Gee, in your angst you failed to recognize that I never said you posted it.
My comment was on your observational skills and/or the lack of same.
So tell everyone, Mary, how your intelligence aide you with the conclusion you arrived at. :lol: