Another "Christlike" Christian...

Yurt said:
wait a minute, so now you're back peddling away from your "ONE" "SINGULAR" christian claim. lmao. are you drunk?

you're just angry because i showed you lied. if you don't like people calling out your lies, then don't lie. why you even had to rant that this was about ONLY one is beyond me. you put "another" in your title. thus proving my point that all you do is bash christians. and to claim that i'm trying to say there is only one is so dishonest it downright laughable. i was pointing out YOUR dishonesty by using YOUR words. but no, zappa has to try and read my mind and claim he knows what i'm thinking. yet you whine that i do that. you're such a whiny hypocrite.
Click to expand...


Getting a little hot under the collar because you've been caught lying once again?

Maybe if poor Yurt was'nt so fixated on playing semantic gotcha games he could discuss the topic logically.

My OP concerned one singular man who claims to be a Christian going on a rampage.

You tried to claim this proved I hated all Christians...sadly, it is easy for anyone to see my OP concerned ONE PERSON ONLY.

At that point Yurt tried to make his ridiculous claim that this thread prove that I hate ALL Christians.

I pointed out my thread title refers to one single Christian nutjob...that you can't accept that fact speaks volumes about the hatred you feel for me.

Keep on twisting and spinning and maybe someone other than two dried-up old twats and a racist hillbilly will side with you...
 
We tend to think of national security narrowly as the risk of a military or terrorist attack,” columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote.


“But national security is about protecting our people and our national strength — and the blunt truth is that the biggest threat to America’s national security this summer doesn’t come from China, Iran or any other foreign power. It comes from budget machinations, and budget maniacs, at home.”


Islamists who may want us harmed need only sit back and enjoy the view.


They might as well have outsourced the job to their Christian brethren, with plenty of assists from mainstream conservatives.


http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/07/25-2
 
Yurt said:
if your OP was about only one person as you claim, why did you include the word "another"?
Click to expand...

Because a thread titled "The First "Christlike" Christian" concerning a nutjob Christian killing in the name of God, would be a lie.

Didn't make it very far in school, did you?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Because a thread titled "The First "Christlike" Christian" concerning a nutjob Christian killing in the name of God, would be a lie
Click to expand...

you could have just said, man pretending to be christian. instead you specifically used the word another. which, if you bothered to learn what i means, means more than one. thus, your claim that your thread is only about one person is a complete lie.
 
Yurt said:
you could have just said, man pretending to be christian. instead you specifically used the word another. which, if you bothered to learn what i means, means more than one. thus, your claim that your thread is only about one person is a complete lie.
Click to expand...

So your excuse for being a lying douche is you don't agree with my choice of words...understood.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
So your excuse for being a lying douche is you don't agree with my choice of words...understood.
Click to expand...

and look is telling me what i meant. lol. kreskin projector

you do realize you're saying that another doesn't mean more than one....does another mean only this one christian? yes or no.
 
After the Oklahoma City bombing in April 1995, speculation flew on television news stations about Arab terrorists seen in the vicinity of the federal building.

The thought that a home-grown, Midwestern Army veteran of the first Gulf war could possibly murder 168 people, including 19 children at a day care center, seemed as foreign as those Islamic lands that were then inspiring so much of bigotry’s latest American mutant.

McVeigh turned out to be as all-American as he could possibly be, with extras.

His paradoxical worship of the Second Amendment was the faith that fueled his hatred of a government he felt had betrayed American ideals by enabling what he called “Socialist wannabe slaves.”

His idealism of a golden-age white America was the Christian translation of al-Qaeda’s idealized caliphate.


http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/07/25-2
 
Yurt said:
and look is telling me what i meant. lol. kreskin projector

you do realize you're saying that another doesn't mean more than one....does another mean only this one christian? yes or no.
Click to expand...


Does the word Terrorist refer to the singular or the plural?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Why did you "conveniently" leave out the word--terrorist?
Click to expand...

because it is not relevant. you dishonestly attempted to move the goal post. the issue here is the word "another", you tried to act like the word doesn't matter. you want desperately to ignore the word because you know it makes you a liar. that is why you haven't once admitted the word means more than one.
 
Yurt said:
because it is not relevant. you dishonestly attempted to move the goal post. the issue here is the word "another", you tried to act like the word doesn't matter. you want desperately to ignore the word because you know it makes you a liar. that is why you haven't once admitted the word means more than one.
Click to expand...


you try to act like the word terrorist doesn't matter...but...

It's the SUBJECT of the thread...but by all means you keep trying to find ways to spin this instead of just admitting you were wrong...LOL!
 
The reason why the word doesn't matter, is because you can use the word "terrorist" to refer to a plural subject-matter in many instances. Terrorist cell, terrorist wing, terrorist raiders, etc. all come to mind. Lets not be completely retarded here, Zappas...
 
ZappasGuitar said:
you try to act like the word terrorist doesn't matter...but...

It's the SUBJECT of the thread...but by all means you keep trying to find ways to spin this instead of just admitting you were wrong...LOL!
Click to expand...

is the title of the thread - "Christlike" Christian

or is the title:

Another "Christlike" Christian
 
Threedee said:
The reason why the word doesn't matter, is because you can use the word "terrorist" to refer to a plural subject-matter in many instances. Terrorist cell, terrorist wing, terrorist raiders, etc. all come to mind. Lets not be completely retarded here, Zappas...
Click to expand...

But when you say "terrorist cell" you are still referring to one singular cell...if you meant more than one cell, you'd say "cells"..."wings"..."raiders".

And if you wanted to discuss the members of said cell, they would be "terroristS".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top