USA becomes Food Stamp Nation but is it sustainable?

Cancel 2018. 3

<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
USA becomes Food Stamp Nation but is it sustainable?

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Genna Saucedo supervises cashiers at a Wal-Mart in Pico Rivera, California, but her wages aren't enough to feed herself and her 12-year-old son.

Saucedo, who earns $9.70 an hour for about 26 hours a week and lives with her mother, is one of the many Americans who survive because of government handouts in what has rapidly become a food stamp nation.

Altogether, there are now almost 46 million people in the United States on food stamps, roughly 15 percent of the population. That's an increase of 74 percent since 2007, just before the financial crisis and a deep recession led to mass job losses.

At the same time, the cost doubled to reach $68 billion in 2010 -- more than a third of the amount the U.S. government received in corporate income tax last year -- which means the program has started to attract the attention of some Republican lawmakers looking for ways to cut the nation's budget deficit.

While there are clearly some cases of abuse by people who claim food stamps but don't really need them, for many Americans like Saucedo there is little current alternative if they are to put food on the table while paying rent and utility bills.

"It's kind of sad that even though I'm working that I need to have government assistance. I have asked them to please put me on full-time so I can have benefits," said the 32-year-old.

She's worked at Wal-Mart for nine months, and applied for food stamps as soon as her probation ended. She said plenty of her colleagues are in the same situation.

http://news.yahoo.com/usa-becomes-food-stamp-nation-sustainable-160645036.html

is this sustainable? if not, how do we fix the problem? raise wages? stop spending money elsewhere and pour into welfare?
 
Soon Obama and his band of merry socialists will want to take over all of the farming so they can control what is to be grown.
 
Shh... I heard that food stamps are stimulus and that means it's good that so many are desperately in need of food, because that guarantees they'll spend it and stimulate the economy with the food they would buy even if they had a job. I know what we should do. We should pass some regulation that shuts down some of our electrical plants, that will help stimulate the economy more as their employees will be on food stamps too, and that would stimulate the economy. We could push for more research for stuff that doesn't exist because that will ensure that stuff will not be manufactured here, and those people who would buy food with money they earned for making stuff can just be on food stamps and stimulate the economy.

So, take heart, food stamps at a record rate is a good thing. I heard it on teevee.
 
Shh... I heard that food stamps are stimulus and that means it's good that so many are desperately in need of food, because that guarantees they'll spend it and stimulate the economy with the food they would buy even if they had a job. I know what we should do. We should pass some regulation that shuts down some of our electrical plants, that will help stimulate the economy more as their employees will be on food stamps too, and that would stimulate the economy. We could push for more research for stuff that doesn't exist because that will ensure that stuff will not be manufactured here, and those people who would buy food with money can just be on food stamps and stimulate the economy...

So, take heart, food stamps at a record rate is a good thing. I heard it on teevee.

in way, food stamps are a stimulus. unless abused. due to circumstances, my family used food stamps for a couple of years when i was young. without getting into personal details, my family did not like it and used it as a last resort and it did help. that government money went to us and then to grocers. under the right circumstances, it can work and act as a stimulus because due to food help, we were able to buy clothes and the occasional toy. given our economy is heavily consumer based, i believe it worked all the way around.
 
I would hope that everyone would say they don't want to see anyone go hungry in this country. Of course there can be disagreements over the best way aid should be adiministered but we all agree we should help people who need to eat.
 
I would hope that everyone would say they don't want to see anyone go hungry in this country. Of course there can be disagreements over the best way aid should be adiministered but we all agree we should help people who need to eat.

I'm good with that, but would prefer leaders that didn't try to feed me reasons on how it is a good thing to try to distract from how it really is a measure of the failure of policy. Food stamps are a necessity, but the massive growth in their need is not a sign of effective "stimulus" policy.
 
I'm good with that, but would prefer leaders that didn't try to feed me reasons on how it is a good thing to try to distract from how it really is a measure of the failure of policy. Food stamps are a necessity, but the massive growth in their need is not a sign of effective "stimulus" policy.

I agree with you. The talk needs to be about getting people off food stamps not how it works as a stimulus.
 
Yes, getting them off food stamps, and how does the government do that?

Where are the jobs, Boehner, he made promises of jobs, and now all it comes down to is passing the blame game. In the mean time, the rich get richer, the poor get poorer, maybe, musicals will come back!
 
Republican fools dont realize that government aid to the needy got us out of the depression,and taking it away would have a devastating effect on the U.S. Economy.
 
Food stamps are not the freaking problem, they are a symptom.

Walmart workers wouldn't be able to work at Walmart were it not for foodstamps. Does this mean foodstamps are wrong, or Walmart is wrong?
 
it's that soft attitude that perpetuates the welfare state. If you have a job, that's what you can afford to feed your family with.
2yrs unemployment keeps the rate high
 
Yes, getting them off food stamps, and how does the government do that?

Where are the jobs, Boehner, he made promises of jobs, and now all it comes down to is passing the blame game. In the mean time, the rich get richer, the poor get poorer, maybe, musicals will come back!

Funny you mention Boehner given that he controls ONE of the three houses.... What of Obama and Reid who control the other two? Both of them have promised jobs as well. What have THEY done? They even had control of ALL THREE Houses for TWO years.... What did they do to create jobs THEN Rana?
 
Hmmm.... the govt. has to subsidize WalMart. I wish I could start a company and have the govt. feed my employees so I could pay them less and profit from it.

Where were you when Perrot told us this was happening? Where were you when we lost 150,000 factories over the last 20 yrs because of the conservative economic ideology of outsourcing. Where were you when Faux 'news' said a global economy and 'free' trade would rise all boats? Remember that? didn't think so. 30 yrs of failed ideology is hard to fix in 1 generation especially when the conservative half of the govt. fights against anything that would benefit labor and take money from their corporate sponsors.

The Republicons and their teabagger toadies want people hungry and destitute for the next election. They think they can blame 30 yrs of failed policy on Obama.

The way out of our mess is to radically change trade laws, protect American labor and award companies who are not in the Caymans.
 
Hmmm.... the govt. has to subsidize WalMart. I wish I could start a company and have the govt. feed my employees so I could pay them less and profit from it.

Where were you when Perrot told us this was happening? Where were you when we lost 150,000 factories over the last 20 yrs because of the conservative economic ideology of outsourcing. Where were you when Faux 'news' said a global economy and 'free' trade would rise all boats? Remember that? didn't think so. 30 yrs of failed ideology is hard to fix in 1 generation especially when the conservative half of the govt. fights against anything that would benefit labor and take money from their corporate sponsors.

The Republicons and their teabagger toadies want people hungry and destitute for the next election. They think they can blame 30 yrs of failed policy on Obama.

The way out of our mess is to radically change trade laws, protect American labor and award companies who are not in the Caymans.

How would enacting trade tariffs today have any different results than Smoot-Hawley did in 1930?
 
OTE=Crashk;857289]Hmmm.... the govt. has to subsidize WalMart. I wish I could start a company and have the govt. feed my employees so I could pay them less and profit from it.

horse manure. how is the government subsidizing wal mart? what money is the government giving directly to wal mart.

Where were you when Perrot told us this was happening? Where were you when we lost 150,000 factories over the last 20 yrs because of the conservative economic ideology of outsourcing. Where were you when Faux 'news' said a global economy and 'free' trade would rise all boats? Remember that? didn't think so. 30 yrs of failed ideology is hard to fix in 1 generation especially when the conservative half of the govt. fights against anything that would benefit labor and take money from their corporate sponsors.

The Republicons and their teabagger toadies want people hungry and destitute for the next election. They think they can blame 30 yrs of failed policy on Obama.

The way out of our mess is to radically change trade laws, protect American labor and award companies who are not in the Caymans.

yeah, thats it, republicans also want to kill all liberals :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top