Mitt gets miffed!

Damn Yankee said:
That they think he can lose against The Obama.
Click to expand...

they are def wrong. romney is one of the most capable candidates the repubs have. last election he was consistently seen as the number 1 candidate for repubs that listed as the economy as the most important issue, which only bodes even better for him this time around.
 
you tea party retards that think he would get hammered are lol. like it or not he's the repubs best chance of winning given everything we know at this time. Someone as dumb and fucking retarded as palin would get chewed alive.

Why do you think romney won mass? It's because he was a wide appeal.
 
Synchronicity said:
you tea party retards that think he would get hammered are lol. like it or not he's the repubs best chance of winning given everything we know at this time. Someone as dumb and fucking retarded as palin would get chewed alive.

Why do you think romney won mass? It's because he was a wide appeal.
Click to expand...

Yep, his version of "Obamacare"....Romneycare in MA got him a lot of love there, but may not bode well with the neocons and teabaggers. But to make up for it, he can point to all those companies he flipped that resulted in more 99'ers for the country to bear.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Yep, his version of "Obamacare"....Romneycare in MA got him a lot of love there, but may not bode well with the neocons and teabaggers.
Click to expand...

the teabaggers are very stupid individuals, and have short attention spans. Just expect romney to hype up all the 'murica talk and other such things and he may be able to sweep under the rug his horrible past of helping sick people.
 
Taichiliberal said:
So are you stupidly advocating NO taxes for anyone, or just NO FAIR SHARE OF TAXES for rich folks and corporations only? Or are you just being stubborn to the point of insipidness in your defense of folks who essentially wipe their feet on you, DY?
Click to expand...
FAIR tax, eliminate corporate taxes since it's double taxation, everyone pays the same rate, and cut spending drastically. We'd be more competitive in overseas markets because our products would be cheaper, and corporations who have fled due to high taxes would move back.
 
Damn Yankee said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
So are you stupidly advocating NO taxes for anyone, or just NO FAIR SHARE OF TAXES for rich folks and corporations only? Or are you just being stubborn to the point of insipidness in your defense of folks who essentially wipe their feet on you, DY?
Click to expand...


FAIR tax, eliminate corporate taxes since it's double taxation, everyone pays the same rate, and cut spending drastically. We'd be more competitive in overseas markets because our products would be cheaper, and corporations who have fled due to high taxes would move back.
Click to expand...

Corporate taxes are just that "corporate" taxes, and not a "double tax" as the cabal of Limbaugh and WND clones and clowns would have you believe. The "flat tax" idea just won't sail as to date no one can explain a flat tax for the various tiers or our economic/social society that would reflect the use of the commons. And exactly what "spending" do you want to drastically cut? Military? Corporate welfare? Subsidizing corporations for setting up shops overseas? Or are you so duped that you just want to slit your own throat by extending Bush tax cuts and eliminating Soc Sec and Medicare?

See DY, you originally made an incorrect statement that I provided FACTS that proved you wrong. But in true neocon parrot fashion, you're too cowardly to admit such, so you just plow through with a additional litany of neocon/teabagger talking points....which all fail with a little realistic review.

Corporatations are NOT people, DY....they are a business construct on a piece of paper...corporations are NOT given "rights" under the Constitution or the Bill of Rights, and I defy you to show where they are in no uncertain terms. Deal with it and stop carrying water for corporate lobbyist in DC.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Corporate taxes are just that "corporate" taxes, and not a "double tax" as the cabal of Limbaugh and WND clones and clowns would have you believe. The "flat tax" idea just won't sail as to date no one can explain a flat tax for the various tiers or our economic/social society that would reflect the use of the commons. And exactly what "spending" do you want to drastically cut? Military? Corporate welfare? Subsidizing corporations for setting up shops overseas? Or are you so duped that you just want to slit your own throat by extending Bush tax cuts and eliminating Soc Sec and Medicare?

See DY, you originally made an incorrect statement that I provided FACTS that proved you wrong. But in true neocon parrot fashion, you're too cowardly to admit such, so you just plow through with a additional litany of neocon/teabagger talking points....which all fail with a little realistic review.

Corporatations are NOT people, DY....they are a business construct on a piece of paper...corporations are NOT given "rights" under the Constitution or the Bill of Rights, and I defy you to show where they are in no uncertain terms. Deal with it and stop carrying water for corporate lobbyist in DC.
Click to expand...

Corps are owned by people, so the owners pay the corp tax, take profits, then get taxed on that income. It's double taxation. They also hire lots of people- why do you want to punish employers?
 
Damn Yankee said:
Corps are owned by people, so the owners pay the corp tax, take profits, then get taxed on that income. It's double taxation. They also hire lots of people- why do you want to punish employers?
Click to expand...

If they hire lots of people, why is unemployment so high?
 
Damn Yankee said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Corporate taxes are just that "corporate" taxes, and not a "double tax" as the cabal of Limbaugh and WND clones and clowns would have you believe. The "flat tax" idea just won't sail as to date no one can explain a flat tax for the various tiers or our economic/social society that would reflect the use of the commons. And exactly what "spending" do you want to drastically cut? Military? Corporate welfare? Subsidizing corporations for setting up shops overseas? Or are you so duped that you just want to slit your own throat by extending Bush tax cuts and eliminating Soc Sec and Medicare?

See DY, you originally made an incorrect statement that I provided FACTS that proved you wrong. But in true neocon parrot fashion, you're too cowardly to admit such, so you just plow through with a additional litany of neocon/teabagger talking points....which all fail with a little realistic review.

Corporatations are NOT people, DY....they are a business construct on a piece of paper...corporations are NOT given "rights" under the Constitution or the Bill of Rights, and I defy you to show where they are in no uncertain terms. Deal with it and stop carrying water for corporate lobbyist in DC.
Click to expand...


Corps are owned by people, so the owners pay the corp tax, take profits, then get taxed on that income. It's double taxation. They also hire lots of people- why do you want to punish employers?
Click to expand...

People own the corps, people pay the taxes on the corporation revenue derived, the additional "salary" they pay themselves and the property the corporation occupys, etc.. No "double tax", as the OWNERS are paying the taxes on their business and their revenue derived. YOU can call it a "double tax" all day long and it STILL won't register with anyone outside the tea party as logical. This has been the standard for a century or so...and we had a growing, thriving middle class with working class people who could raise a family on a single salary.....until some idiots voted in a bunch ideological yahoos hell bent on destroying that and throwing out all things New Deal.

Bottom line: If corporations were "people" as you say, then the "owners" would be guilty of slavery....which was outlawed a LONG time ago. Just thought you should know. Carry on. ;)
 
Taichiliberal said:
People own the corps, people pay the taxes on the corporation revenue derived, the additional "salary" they pay themselves and the property the corporation occupys, etc.. No "double tax", as the OWNERS are paying the taxes on their business and their revenue derived. YOU can call it a "double tax" all day long and it STILL won't register with anyone outside the tea party as logical. This has been the standard for a century or so...and we had a growing, thriving middle class with working class people who could raise a family on a single salary.....until some idiots voted in a bunch ideological yahoos hell bent on destroying that and throwing out all things New Deal.

Bottom line: If corporations were "people" as you say, then the "owners" would be guilty of slavery....which was outlawed a LONG time ago. Just thought you should know. Carry on. ;)
Click to expand...

When the corp makes a profit it's taxed on it, then distributed to the owners as income and they are taxed again.
 
Where's that example of how "libs insist on making the business environment hostile to them"?
 
Damn Yankee said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
People own the corps, people pay the taxes on the corporation revenue derived, the additional "salary" they pay themselves and the property the corporation occupys, etc.. No "double tax", as the OWNERS are paying the taxes on their business and their revenue derived. YOU can call it a "double tax" all day long and it STILL won't register with anyone outside the tea party as logical. This has been the standard for a century or so...and we had a growing, thriving middle class with working class people who could raise a family on a single salary.....until some idiots voted in a bunch ideological yahoos hell bent on destroying that and throwing out all things New Deal.

Bottom line: If corporations were "people" as you say, then the "owners" would be guilty of slavery....which was outlawed a LONG time ago. Just thought you should know. Carry on
Click to expand...
When the corp makes a profit it's taxed on it, then distributed to the owners as income and they are taxed again.
Click to expand...

Like I said in my previous response (of which I extended the highlight so it will sink in), YOU can repeat your BS until doomsday, and only insipidly stubborn teabagger/neocon jokers like yourself will swallow it. And I notice you don't DARE address the other point I made. Now, run-a-long like a good little teabagging toadie and repeat your BS ad nauseum.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top