Christine O'Donnell walks out on CNN's Piers Morgan

Teabaggers pwned.


How many Teatards didn't even watch the video or read excerpts from O'Donnell's book before parroting their rightwing talking points?


O'Donnel's book contains references to gay marriage and her sister is a lesbian.


Since she was supposedly on TV to discuss her book, how is asking her a questions about the book's content an issue?


How many of the Teabaggers here will even buy her shitty book?


Who's the bigger loser - her, or the JPP Teatard echo chamber who leapt to her defense without having the facts?



http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/christine-odonnell-book-troublemaker-excerpted/story?id=14310418
 
cawacko said:
Not supporting gay marriage is a wacko view? Obama doesn't support it. One of the most liberal states in the country, California, has a vote to ban gay marriage and it passed.
Click to expand...

Has Obama walked out of any interviews?
 
\(\(V\/V)/)/ said:
Has Obama walked out of any interviews?
Click to expand...

He wouldn't schedule them unless he knew that certain things would not be asked. Watch O'Reilly's interviews with him, you'll see it. That is the place to control that.

In this case she prepared answers to it, but the interviewer didn't want to accept that prepared response.
 
Damocles said:
He wouldn't schedule them unless he knew that certain things would not be asked. Watch O'Reilly's interviews with him, you'll see it. That is the place to control that. In this case she prepared answers to it, but the interviewer didn't want to accept that prepared response.
Click to expand...

Bullshit.

 
"He wouldn't schedule them unless he knew that certain things would not be asked."

Do you know which subjects the President stipulated couldn't be asked of him and in which interviews? Did O'Reilly say that? If O'Reilly admitted that he agreed to interview the President and not bring up certain subjects, then I would believe that. O'Reilly is a straight-shooter.

Do you have a link showing O'Reilly confessing this?
 
\(\(V\/V)/)/ said:
Bullshit.

Click to expand...

Yup. The dude spent an inordinate amount of time trying to get her to talk about sex, her book wasn't solely about that. She answered the questions, he tried to refocus... At that point he decided not to accept her answer, and solely speak about that factor of her past.

I'm good with what I stated, the video backs it up.
 
It's amazing the lengths Damo will go to when someone has an (R) after their name. Just yesterday he was critizing Obama for getting testy at a campaign stop...
 
Onceler said:
It's amazing the lengths Damo will go to when someone has an (R) after their name. Just yesterday he was critizing Obama for getting testy at a campaign stop...
Click to expand...

What is she running for?

Morgan appeared like a perv, who wanted a pretty girl to talk about sex on his show. Her book isn't solely about that, but it was the only topic he was interested in speaking about.
 
Damocles said:
Yup. The dude spent an inordinate amount of time trying to get her to talk about sex, her book wasn't solely about that. She answered the questions, he tried to refocus... At that point he decided not to accept her answer, and solely speak about that factor of her past.

I'm good with what I stated, the video backs it up.
Click to expand...

She never answered the questions and he kept at her about topics she wrote about in her book. I am with Morgan on this one. I would say any subject her book covers is fair game and when a interviewee refuses to answer questions, I respect them when they keep pushing on.

The interviewee does not decide the topics, the interviewer does.
 
cawacko said:
Not supporting gay marriage is a wacko view? Obama doesn't support it. One of the most liberal states in the country, California, has a vote to ban gay marriage and it passed.
Click to expand...

Saying the masterbation is adultry is.
 
Jarod said:
She never answered the questions and he kept at her about topics she wrote about in her book. I am with Morgan on this one. I would say any subject her book covers is fair game and when a interviewee refuses to answer questions, I respect them when they keep pushing on.

The interviewee does not decide the topics, the interviewer does.
Click to expand...

The subject of the book was not sex, but from that interview you would think that was the only topic in it.

I would have walked too. She stated simply she wanted to speak about the actual topic of the book, decentralizing government.
 
Damocles said:
Actually it becomes the central theme of almost any interview because they keep answering it and the interviewers would rather focus on that. I don't blame them if I wanted them to lose I would focus on the unpopular planks too.
Click to expand...

I thught you said she was not running for anything? What does Piers Morgan want O'Donnel to lose?
 
Damocles said:
The subject of the book was not sex, but from that interview you would think that was the only topic in it.

I would have walked too. She stated simply she wanted to speak about the actual topic of the book, decentralizing government.
Click to expand...

1) I suspect had she answered the questions asked he would have discussed other topics.
2) She admits there are chapters in her book about these sexual topics.
 
Jarod said:
I thught you said she was not running for anything? What does Piers Morgan want O'Donnel to lose?
Click to expand...

In that post I was speaking of interviews in general, not specifically this one. You can tell that it was an extension of my first post which was a more general statement about interviews with republicans and how they consistently lose message when they let interviewers focus on that issue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top