'Yes We Can' social club busted for drugs, prostitution... typical!

Mr. T

Mr. T

Verified User
Bel-Ridge, Mo (KSDK) -- St. Louis County police will release more information this afternoon about 30 people were taken into custody from a home in Bel-Ridge last week.

They were taken into custody shortly before midnight on August 11.

Police said they went to a home in the 8800 block of Snowhill Court to execute a search warrant for prostitution, drugs and alcohol.

According to the Missouri Secretary of State's website, the business, Yes We Can Social Club, is run out of that home.

Police have not yet presented their case to prosecutors for possible charges to be filed.
http://www.ksdk.com/news/article/271778/3/30-taken-into-custody-at-Yes-We-Can-Social-Club

obama_inauguration_victory_t_shirt_large.png


The yes we did crowd is back at it again, smokin and dealin crack, pimpin hoes etc.
 
Mr. T said:
Bel-Ridge, Mo (KSDK) -- St. Louis County police will release more information this afternoon about 30 people were taken into custody from a home in Bel-Ridge last week.

They were taken into custody shortly before midnight on August 11.

Police said they went to a home in the 8800 block of Snowhill Court to execute a search warrant for prostitution, drugs and alcohol.

According to the Missouri Secretary of State's website, the business, Yes We Can Social Club, is run out of that home.

Police have not yet presented their case to prosecutors for possible charges to be filed.
http://www.ksdk.com/news/article/271778/3/30-taken-into-custody-at-Yes-We-Can-Social-Club

obama_inauguration_victory_t_shirt_large.png


The yes we did crowd is back at it again, smokin and dealin crack, pimpin hoes etc.
Click to expand...

No charges filed, huh?

Guilty until proven innocent though, according to you.
 
Mr. T said:
Bel-Ridge, Mo (KSDK) -- St. Louis County police will release more information this afternoon about 30 people were taken into custody from a home in Bel-Ridge last week.

They were taken into custody shortly before midnight on August 11.

Police said they went to a home in the 8800 block of Snowhill Court to execute a search warrant for prostitution, drugs and alcohol.

According to the Missouri Secretary of State's website, the business, Yes We Can Social Club, is run out of that home.

Police have not yet presented their case to prosecutors for possible charges to be filed.
http://www.ksdk.com/news/article/271778/3/30-taken-into-custody-at-Yes-We-Can-Social-Club

obama_inauguration_victory_t_shirt_large.png


The yes we did crowd is back at it again, smokin and dealin crack, pimpin hoes etc.
Click to expand...

I suppose it's not about a social club being a *possible* nuisance, but that it's called the "Yes We Can" club. Your obvious sweeping generalization to link their actions to Obama supporters only.
 
Return of Dune said:
No charges filed, huh?

Guilty until proven innocent though, according to you.
Click to expand...

We have seen this before under the Obamao justice system.

Charges against the New Black Panther party dropped!

Source

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights voted on Aug. 7 to send a letter to Justice expanding its own investigation and demanding more complete answers. "We believe the Department's defense of its actions thus far undermines respect for rule of law," its letter stated. It noted "the peculiar logic" of one Justice argument, that defendants' failure to show up in court was a reason for dismissing the case: "Such an argument sends a perverse message to wrongdoers—that attempts at voter suppression will be tolerated so long as the persons who engage in them are careful not to appear in court to answer the government's complaint."
Click to expand...

Not only do we give them foodstamps we also let them off the hook when they want to Flash Mob a seven Eleven.
 
Mr. T said:
We have seen this before under the Obamao justice system.

Charges against the New Black Panther party dropped!

Source



Not only do we give them foodstamps we also let them off the hook when they want to Flash Mob a seven Eleven.
Click to expand...

"Them?" What evidence do you have that any of "them" are getting government assistance?

Btw, that's a rhetorical question, I already know the answer.
 
Mr. T said:
Bel-Ridge, Mo (KSDK) -- St. Louis County police will release more information this afternoon about 30 people were taken into custody from a home in Bel-Ridge last week.

They were taken into custody shortly before midnight on August 11.

Police said they went to a home in the 8800 block of Snowhill Court to execute a search warrant for prostitution, drugs and alcohol.

According to the Missouri Secretary of State's website, the business, Yes We Can Social Club, is run out of that home.

Police have not yet presented their case to prosecutors for possible charges to be filed.
http://www.ksdk.com/news/article/271778/3/30-taken-into-custody-at-Yes-We-Can-Social-Club

obama_inauguration_victory_t_shirt_large.png


The yes we did crowd is back at it again, smokin and dealin crack, pimpin hoes etc.
Click to expand...

It's so discouraging in this time of financial difficulty with most regular folks cutting back on entertainment we see authorities taking to busting social clubs. Shameful!
 
Mr. T said:
We have seen this before under the Obamao justice system.

Charges against the New Black Panther party dropped!

Source



Not only do we give them foodstamps we also let them off the hook when they want to Flash Mob a seven Eleven.
Click to expand...

The 'Black Panther' ruling was under Bush, not Obama. The case was downgraded to a civil case 11 days before Obama was inaugurated, 26 days before Eric Holder became attorney general, and about nine months before Thomas Perez was confirmed as head of the Civil Rights Division.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/jul/23/bill-oreilly/bill-oreilly-blames-obama-administration-not-pursu/

SXknf.jpg
 
Return of Dune said:
You mean interstate highways, stuff like that?
Click to expand...

If that is what you refer to as the share the wealth programs he is talking about. But you have to remember Obama's Commi Care that is coming. Obama phones? Increased the size of the food stamp program, extended unemployment benefits etc etc.

of course we needed to extend unemployment because Obamao's economic plan is worthless. The recovery never hit Main St. But it sure helped Wall St.
 
Mr. T said:
If that is what you refer to as the share the wealth programs he is talking about. But you have to remember Obama's Commi Care that is coming. Obama phones? Increased the size of the food stamp program, extended unemployment benefits etc etc.

of course we needed to extend unemployment because Obamao's economic plan is worthless. The recovery never hit Main St. But it sure helped Wall St.
Click to expand...

Keep drinking that kool-aid. Internet rumor is a wonderful thing.

Forwarded email claims the Obama administration has started a program whereby taxpayer money is being 'redistributed' to provide free cell phones and service to welfare recipients.

Description: Email rumor
Circulating since: Oct. 2009
Status: Partly true, with spin

Is there a U.S. government program that provides free or discounted phones and wireless service to low-income Americans?
Yes. It consists of two parts: "Link-Up," which helps income-eligible people set up new home phone service, and "Lifeline," which helps income-eligible people pay their monthly phone charges. (Source: FCC)

Was this program instituted by the Obama administration?
No. Nor was it just instituted "earlier this year," as the email claims. The program as it exists today was created over a decade ago by an act of Congress, the Telecommunications Act of 1996. A version of the Lifeline program was already in operation as far back as the early 1980s. (Source: Lifelinesupport.org)

Does the program offer every welfare recipient a free phone and 70 minutes of wireless service?
Not necessarily. The specific benefits vary according to locale and service provider. Also, the program is designed to help low-income people generally, not just welfare recipients. Examples: Safelink Wireless | ATT Lifeline and Link-Up | Verizon Low Income Programs. (Source: FCC)

Is it accurate to say that taxpayer money is being 'redistributed' to provide these services?
Basically yes, though not in the sense one might assume. Apart from being administered by the FCC, it's not a federally-funded program. Since its inception, the program has been financed via the pooled contributions of commercial phone service providers, which in turn impose small monthly fees on their regular customers to recoup the cost. (Source: FCC)

http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/barackobama/a/obama_phone_free_cell_phones.htm
 
christiefan915 said:
Keep drinking that kool-aid. Internet rumor is a wonderful thing.

Forwarded email claims the Obama administration has started a program whereby taxpayer money is being 'redistributed' to provide free cell phones and service to welfare recipients.

Description: Email rumor
Circulating since: Oct. 2009
Status: Partly true, with spin

Is there a U.S. government program that provides free or discounted phones and wireless service to low-income Americans?
Yes. It consists of two parts: "Link-Up," which helps income-eligible people set up new home phone service, and "Lifeline," which helps income-eligible people pay their monthly phone charges. (Source: FCC)

Was this program instituted by the Obama administration?
No. Nor was it just instituted "earlier this year," as the email claims. The program as it exists today was created over a decade ago by an act of Congress, the Telecommunications Act of 1996. A version of the Lifeline program was already in operation as far back as the early 1980s. (Source: Lifelinesupport.org)

Does the program offer every welfare recipient a free phone and 70 minutes of wireless service?
Not necessarily. The specific benefits vary according to locale and service provider. Also, the program is designed to help low-income people generally, not just welfare recipients. Examples: Safelink Wireless | ATT Lifeline and Link-Up | Verizon Low Income Programs. (Source: FCC)

Is it accurate to say that taxpayer money is being 'redistributed' to provide these services?
Basically yes, though not in the sense one might assume. Apart from being administered by the FCC, it's not a federally-funded program. Since its inception, the program has been financed via the pooled contributions of commercial phone service providers, which in turn impose small monthly fees on their regular customers to recoup the cost. (Source: FCC)

http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/barackobama/a/obama_phone_free_cell_phones.htm
Click to expand...

There you go again, confusing poor Mr. T with facts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top