A Failed Presidency -- The American Problem

Cancel 2018. 3

<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
A Failed Presidency -- The American Problem

ew Americans needed Standard & Poor to confirm the mismanagement of the United States government and its finances. The downgrading of American credit will raise interest rates on America’s huge debt and ultimately on all Americans. Popular polls say that most Americans blame Congress—but that’s too simplistic. As much as Barack Obama would like to shift that blame onto Congress, the fault lies squarely on the shoulders of President. It is first and foremost a leadership problem that is crippling America—and the leader is President Barack Obama—not the many members of Congress.

No matter how many speeches he makes, the conclusion is clear: Obama’s greatest failure is spending America into enormous deficits, and being clueless about how to get the economy to recover. His speeches, riddled with “I” and “We” are mostly serving to indict him for his failings. Appearing on TV more than any other sitting president, Barack Obama is constantly “explaining” why things aren’t working, when he should be working on what to do different and better.



Instead he is “campaigning,” which is the only thing he knows how to do reasonable well. But he can’t fix the economy; he has neither the experience nor the knowhow to do it. His failed, misguided policies have only exacerbated the size of his mistakes and shortcomings.

For Barack Obama’s first 18 months, and occasionally even today, he and his loyalists try to place the lion’s share of the blame for America’s problems with George W. Bush. There is little doubt that Bush erred seriously on several counts: he initiated two expensive wars and then saw the Iraq war mismanaged for at least 2-3 years.



Then Bush failed, along with the (then) GOP led Congress to rein in spending to compensate for the cost of these wars. Finally, he reduced tax rates and created the Medicare prescription drug program (which turned out to work better and cost far less than was feared). Coincidentally, the much-maligned TARP initiated by Bush actually staved off a financial collapse and is largely being paid back by the banks and insurance companies involved. In perhaps his greatest mistake, Bush failed to veto a single spending bill sent to him by Congress.



Bush’s mistakes were clearly serious errors, but they pale in comparison with Obama’s failures since he took office. The Democratically controlled Congress was complicit with Obama’s failures. They have not submitted, and Obama has not submitted a realistic budget for the country in over 800 days—a clear failure to meet their responsibilities. (Exception: Obama’s irresponsible Feb. budget, which was voted down 97-0 by a Democratically controlled Senate.)



To chronicle Obama’s failures and his shortcomings is impossible within the length of a simple blog post. A few of them are most notable. Obama aided and abetted by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid rammed the new health care legislation down the throat of America—and Obamacare was created. Parts of it are well-intentioned, but much of it is feared by Americans and especially small businesses. Arguably some of Obama’s greatest damage to the economy has been done by his appointees in the EPA, NLRB, CPSC, et. al., and the Justice Department. American business is oppressed by regulation. Sadly, Obama barely realizes this.



Next came the $840 billion “stimulus” package, (mostly pork and patronage), which worked poorly or not at all—unless you consider creating jobs at $275,000 each to be a good solution. Not enough “shovel-ready” projects were really “shovel-ready” Obama admitted recently, chuckling awkwardly at his naiveté. Obama and his experts (now mostly gone back to finance or academia) predicted a drop of unemployment to under 8% when the number of jobless went the other way—upward. Now, more Americans have been out of work, for longer, than any time in the past half-century.

http://news.yahoo.com/failed-presidency-american-problem-162509281.html
 
A Failed Presidency -- The American Problem

ew Americans needed Standard & Poor to confirm the mismanagement of the United States government and its finances. The downgrading of American credit will raise interest rates on America’s huge debt and ultimately on all Americans. Popular polls say that most Americans blame Congress—but that’s too simplistic. As much as Barack Obama would like to shift that blame onto Congress, the fault lies squarely on the shoulders of President. It is first and foremost a leadership problem that is crippling America—and the leader is President Barack Obama—not the many members of Congress.

No matter how many speeches he makes, the conclusion is clear: Obama’s greatest failure is spending America into enormous deficits, and being clueless about how to get the economy to recover. His speeches, riddled with “I” and “We” are mostly serving to indict him for his failings. Appearing on TV more than any other sitting president, Barack Obama is constantly “explaining” why things aren’t working, when he should be working on what to do different and better.



Instead he is “campaigning,” which is the only thing he knows how to do reasonable well. But he can’t fix the economy; he has neither the experience nor the knowhow to do it. His failed, misguided policies have only exacerbated the size of his mistakes and shortcomings.

For Barack Obama’s first 18 months, and occasionally even today, he and his loyalists try to place the lion’s share of the blame for America’s problems with George W. Bush. There is little doubt that Bush erred seriously on several counts: he initiated two expensive wars and then saw the Iraq war mismanaged for at least 2-3 years.



Then Bush failed, along with the (then) GOP led Congress to rein in spending to compensate for the cost of these wars. Finally, he reduced tax rates and created the Medicare prescription drug program (which turned out to work better and cost far less than was feared). Coincidentally, the much-maligned TARP initiated by Bush actually staved off a financial collapse and is largely being paid back by the banks and insurance companies involved. In perhaps his greatest mistake, Bush failed to veto a single spending bill sent to him by Congress.



Bush’s mistakes were clearly serious errors, but they pale in comparison with Obama’s failures since he took office. The Democratically controlled Congress was complicit with Obama’s failures. They have not submitted, and Obama has not submitted a realistic budget for the country in over 800 days—a clear failure to meet their responsibilities. (Exception: Obama’s irresponsible Feb. budget, which was voted down 97-0 by a Democratically controlled Senate.)



To chronicle Obama’s failures and his shortcomings is impossible within the length of a simple blog post. A few of them are most notable. Obama aided and abetted by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid rammed the new health care legislation down the throat of America—and Obamacare was created. Parts of it are well-intentioned, but much of it is feared by Americans and especially small businesses. Arguably some of Obama’s greatest damage to the economy has been done by his appointees in the EPA, NLRB, CPSC, et. al., and the Justice Department. American business is oppressed by regulation. Sadly, Obama barely realizes this.



Next came the $840 billion “stimulus” package, (mostly pork and patronage), which worked poorly or not at all—unless you consider creating jobs at $275,000 each to be a good solution. Not enough “shovel-ready” projects were really “shovel-ready” Obama admitted recently, chuckling awkwardly at his naiveté. Obama and his experts (now mostly gone back to finance or academia) predicted a drop of unemployment to under 8% when the number of jobless went the other way—upward. Now, more Americans have been out of work, for longer, than any time in the past half-century.

http://news.yahoo.com/failed-presidency-american-problem-162509281.html

BS. Obama is still trying to clean up the mess left by the Bush Administration.

S&P calls out the Republicans!
“We have changed our assumption​ on this because the majority of Republican​s in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced​ by passing the act.” S&P on why they downgraded the US!
 
Gergen wrote this morning that we need a leader like Churchill right now. I would agree with that, but I don't see anyone in the wings even remotely close to that. Romney is such an empty suit, and a follower - it actually bums me out that he is the best the GOP seems able to do at this point.

I think Obama is done; I don't think it's entirely his fault, but he has lost too much clout at this point to lead effectively. I actually think he'll be relieved if he doesn't get another term.

Still, the future doesn't look great unless someone amazing comes out of the woodwork on either side...
 
BS. Obama is still trying to clean up the mess left by the Bush Administration.

S&P calls out the Republicans!
“We have changed our assumption​ on this because the majority of Republican​s in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced​ by passing the act.” S&P on why they downgraded the US!

However, they fail to provide the context in which S&P made that statement, which is exculpatory. The full quote is as follows:

“Compared with previous projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced by passing the act.”

See, in context the quote shows that the statement is not demonstrative of the reason for the change in the rating, but rather that it explains the change in the base case scenario against which S&P evaluates the credit worthiness. A classic lie of omission.
http://www.therightsphere.com/2011/08/sp-downgrade-spin-vs-reality/
 
I have pointed that out twice now. If you read S&P's opening statement as to why the downgrade happened they are specific that it was due to there being no real cuts to entitlement spending.

I've pointed it out at least three times now. These dweebs know the adage well: 'repeat the lie often enough, and folks will begin to believe it'.
 
I have pointed that out twice now. If you read S&P's opening statement as to why the downgrade happened they are specific that it was due to there being no real cuts to entitlement spending.

http://www.therightsphere.com/2011/0...in-vs-reality/

The Right Sphere? Seriously? A right wing blog as an unbiased source? LOL
Of course the propaganda would be more cuts to entitlement spending and nothing about revenue raising via eliminating the Bush tax cuts, benefitting the wealthiest Americans. Just throw children, the elderly and the sick under the bus....that's all you all know.
No wonder Bidstrup entitled his tome: Conservatism: The Politics of Ignorance And Self-Interest
http://www.bidstrup.com/politics.htm
 
Gergen wrote this morning that we need a leader like Churchill right now. I would agree with that, but I don't see anyone in the wings even remotely close to that. Romney is such an empty suit, and a follower - it actually bums me out that he is the best the GOP seems able to do at this point.

I think Obama is done; I don't think it's entirely his fault, but he has lost too much clout at this point to lead effectively. I actually think he'll be relieved if he doesn't get another term.

Still, the future doesn't look great unless someone amazing comes out of the woodwork on either side...

Dangit, we're agreeing again.
 
According to The Obama, he himself is a failure:
"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. government can't pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our government's reckless fiscal policies.… Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that 'the buck stops here.' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better." (Sen. Obama, Congressional Record, S.2237-8, 3/16/06)
 
Gergen wrote this morning that we need a leader like Churchill right now. I would agree with that, but I don't see anyone in the wings even remotely close to that. Romney is such an empty suit, and a follower - it actually bums me out that he is the best the GOP seems able to do at this point.

I think Obama is done; I don't think it's entirely his fault, but he has lost too much clout at this point to lead effectively. I actually think he'll be relieved if he doesn't get another term.

Still, the future doesn't look great unless someone amazing comes out of the woodwork on either side...


What horseshit. Churchill didn't have a dysfunctional political system to deal with. It doesn't matter who is president, if it's a Democrat, the House and the Senate minority aren't going to do anything that the president wants. Period. No amount of speechifying and leadering can force Congress to do anything other than what Congress wants to do. Right now, Congress doesn't want to do anything to improve the economy and will not do anything to improve the economy. Hell, the Republicans rejected a tax cut. When's the last time that happened?
 
this is all smoke n mirrors, a bump in the road. Hillarious to compare it to Churchill WWII eara.

Obama will look a hell of a lot better once Romney is named.
 
LOL LOL LOL Bush lied this country into an immoral war, over extended us politically and militarily, destroyed our national credibility, bungled the war on terrorism, failed to capture or kill Bin Ladin, ran up 7 trillion in national debt and then crashed our economy on the way out the door and you call Obama a failed president? Can you say "Partisan Hack"? LOL LOL LOL LOL
 
What horseshit. Churchill didn't have a dysfunctional political system to deal with. It doesn't matter who is president, if it's a Democrat, the House and the Senate minority aren't going to do anything that the president wants. Period. No amount of speechifying and leadering can force Congress to do anything other than what Congress wants to do. Right now, Congress doesn't want to do anything to improve the economy and will not do anything to improve the economy. Hell, the Republicans rejected a tax cut. When's the last time that happened?

Precisely. The only way a president can have a successful presidency is if he can expect and receive a modicum of cooperation and bi-partisanship from the other side of the aisle. There has been zero for this president.
 
LOL LOL LOL Bush lied this country into an immoral war, over extended us politically and militarily, destroyed our national credibility, bungled the war on terrorism, failed to capture or kill Bin Ladin, ran up 7 trillion in national debt and then crashed our economy on the way out the door and you call Obama a failed president? Can you say "Partisan Hack"? LOL LOL LOL LOL

touche'
 
Precisely. The only way a president can have a successful presidency is if he can expect and receive a modicum of cooperation and bi-partisanship from the other side of the aisle. There has been zero for this president.

And there was for Bush? :)

Pay back's a biatch, ain't it?
 
this is all smoke n mirrors, a bump in the road. Hillarious to compare it to Churchill WWII eara.

Obama will look a hell of a lot better once Romney is named.

Assuming that he is. Keep in mind all the polls are showing that Repelicans are even more unpopular then Obama, particularly the right wing tea party variety and Romney aint exactly the favorite of the Repelican base, He's just the only one who stands a snow balls chance in hell against Obama.
 
Back
Top