Wynn blasts Obama

Superfreak said:
So WHAT is going to get businesses to start hiring dung? MORE regulations? HIGHER taxes? HIGHER insurance costs? HIGHER inflation? You think those are going to help hiring?
Click to expand...

NONE of them are going to matter. If ALL of those factors were in place and 'against' business, it would not stop anyone from supplying a demand. And without a demand ALL of the lollipops in the world would not create a SINGLE solitary JOB...

Econ 101 you MORON!
 
bf didn't bother with college, it's hillarious he's recomending it to a professional investor.

BF don't leave this shit is crazier than an snl skit.
 
Topspin said:
If a pro business republican wins in 12 you'll see job numbers put this years to shame when the fear is removed from business investment. I know you know that, it's for the poor non investor liberals.
Click to expand...
Then please explain to me how most of the biggest era's of growth in employment and our economy have occured under Democratic Presidents?

http://currencythoughts.com/2008/09/26/us-gdp-growth-under-different-presidencies/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobs_created_during_U.S._presidential_terms
 
mott I'll give you the stock markets generally do .5% better under democrats.

I will not give you that corporation don't have trillions on thier balance sheets afraid to invest it.
Facts are facts, Obama will likely win so we may not see the evidence.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Then please explain to me how most of the biggest era's of growth in employment and our economy have occured under Democratic Presidents?

http://currencythoughts.com/2008/09/26/us-gdp-growth-under-different-presidencies/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobs_created_during_U.S._presidential_terms
Click to expand...

Who controlled Congress? What were the market environments when each President took office? do you really expect anyone other than one of your fellow morons to look at who was in the White House as a stand alone stat and say 'yeah, that must have been the reason for growth'????
 
Superfreak said:
Who controlled Congress? What were the market environments when each President took office? do you really expect anyone other than one of your fellow morons to look at who was in the White House as a stand alone stat and say 'yeah, that must have been the reason for growth'????
Click to expand...

You're spot on because strictly looking at those Wiki numbers Obama is an absolute failure. No one has lost the number of jobs under their watch like he has since Hoover. Of course we all know there is a bigger picture involved but if you want to go strictly off the numbers...
 
cawacko said:
You're spot on because strictly looking at those Wiki numbers Obama is an absolute failure. No one has lost the number of jobs under their watch like he has since Hoover. Of course we all know there is a bigger picture involved but if you want to go strictly off the numbers...
Click to expand...

exactly....
 
Superfreak said:
That is a class I recommend you take. For you obviously are economically illiterate.
Click to expand...
You have already changed my posts on other threads by totally fabricate words and then put my name to them. Now you are going to hack off words you can't respond to?

So I will recap for you.

Originally Posted by Superfreak
So WHAT is going to get businesses to start hiring dung? MORE regulations? HIGHER taxes? HIGHER insurance costs? HIGHER inflation? You think those are going to help hiring?


Originally Posted by Bfgrn
NONE of them are going to matter. If ALL of those factors were in place and 'against' business, it would not stop anyone from supplying a demand. And without a demand ALL of the lollipops in the world would not create a SINGLE solitary JOB...

Econ 101 you MORON!

------------------------------------------------------------

Now, tell me where this in not econ 101...

PS...feel free to jump in Topspin
 
Topspin said:
you are telling people to take what you couldn't qualify for!
Click to expand...

Are you ever going to quit this crap? I have never put anyone on 'ignore', but you will be the exception. You constantly refuse to answer any questions or engage in any debate. Your ONLY reply is the same childish crap.
 
Bfgrn said:
NONE of them are going to matter. If ALL of those factors were in place and 'against' business, it would not stop anyone from supplying a demand. And without a demand ALL of the lollipops in the world would not create a SINGLE solitary JOB...

Econ 101 you MORON!

------------------------------------------------------------

Now, tell me where this in not econ 101...

PS...feel free to jump in Topspin
Click to expand...


ROFLMAO... the very fact that you think NONE of those factors matters when it comes to jobs shows that you are not capable of discussing economics.
 
Superfreak said:
ROFLMAO... the very fact that you think NONE of those factors matters when it comes to jobs shows that you are not capable of discussing economics.
Click to expand...

Oh, so out of control emotions, childish temper tantrums and CEO insecurities trump supply & demand? If the DEMAND were there in Vegas, Wynn would help dig a foundation for a new hotel with his fingernails.

If cry baby Wynn is afraid of President Obama, he'd be sitting in a corner sucking his thumb if FDR were in the White House, and he'd probably commit suicide after President Kennedy raked him over the coals...


"Harry Truman once said, 'There are 14 or 15 million Americans who have the resources to have representatives in Washington to protect their interests, and that the interests of the great mass of the other people - the 150 or 160 million - is the responsibility of the president of the United States, and I propose to fulfill it.'"
President John F. Kennedy
 
Bfgrn said:
Oh, so out of control emotions, childish temper tantrums and CEO insecurities trump supply & demand? If the DEMAND were there in Vegas, Wynn would help dig a foundation for a new hotel with his fingernails.

If cry baby Wynn is afraid of President Obama, he'd be sitting in a corner sucking his thumb if FDR were in the White House, and he'd probably commit suicide after President Kennedy raked him over the coals...


"Harry Truman once said, 'There are 14 or 15 million Americans who have the resources to have representatives in Washington to protect their interests, and that the interests of the great mass of the other people - the 150 or 160 million - is the responsibility of the president of the United States, and I propose to fulfill it.'"
President John F. Kennedy
Click to expand...

I'm not getting the connection between not liking one's policies and actually being afraid of that person. I watched the Kennedy video and I'm missing that connection as well with Wynn. He certainly wasn't the first, nor the last, President to call out an industry.
 
Superfreak said:
ok.... and WHO says Wynn isn't prioritizing? He was going into Macau regardless of the US environment because Macau made sense for the reasons you pointed out. The most important one being the relative infancy of Macau vs. Vegas and thus the higher potential return.

That does not change the fact that he would also like to invest more in Vegas.... especially with the real estate market there the way it is right now relative to the past decade+. Yet he is not doing so due to the concerns he listed. Macau has NOTHING to do with his Vegas decision.
Click to expand...

'WHO says Wynn is not prioritising?' No one as far as I know. Indeed I said that that was exactly what he should be doing.
Is English a problem for you? Don't be embarrassed if it is. I will try to make my sentences a little more simple and type slower.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Then please explain to me how most of the biggest era's of growth in employment and our economy have occured under Democratic Presidents?
Click to expand...

did any of them fuck the economy up as badly as Obama has?......he sure isn't keeping up with his predecessor's track record.....

in addition, I want to see some documentation that the economy grew under Carter.....I personally remember 21% mortgage rates and double digit inflation.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top