The plot thickens...will Faux News be next?

christiefan915 said:
He gave you an article with facts and you responded with your usual snideness.

How about you refuting what was in the article?
Click to expand...

LOL.... which article was that? He has been posting a bunch of OPINION pieces. I provided a list of all the organizations/papers that Murdoch owns. To proclaim that Murdoch himself knows what is going on at each of them is a bit on the absurd side. It would be similar to saying Obama should know what the employees working for the IRS in Austin are doing today.
 
Lowaicue said:
QUOTE=Damn Yankee;835809]Again, no facts. :)
Click to expand...

I guess newspapers are beyond you, huh? Or.... is it that you have ....



censorship!!!!!

The sun is shining here.... you need FACTS? Today is Tuesday .... you need FACTS? You are digging yourself further and further into the 'stooooopid' hole. Better give up now before they come to take you away, ha ha.[/QUOTE]

Newspapers can provide FACTS and they can ALSO provide OPINIONS. The articles he posted are OPINION pieces.
 
Damn Yankee said:
.
Click to expand...

Y'know Damn wanky, yo's right. dere ain't no-o-o facts. Least ways no facts YOU can get your dumb head around. Go tell yoh nay-bore-hood whatever happens de doydy digger is or'ways raht.
Tosser.
Count it as a win, huh, shit fer brains.
 
Superfreak said:
I guess newspapers are beyond you, huh? Or.... is it that you have ....



censorship!!!!!

The sun is shining here.... you need FACTS? Today is Tuesday .... you need FACTS? You are digging yourself further and further into the 'stooooopid' hole. Better give up now before they come to take you away, ha ha.
Click to expand...

Newspapers can provide FACTS and they can ALSO provide OPINIONS. The articles he posted are OPINION pieces.[/QUOTE]

Gosh, you are so-o-o clever. You changed the name all by yourself? wow, you arsehole yanks are real clever. No wonder you rule the world.
 
Lowaicue said:
Y'know Damn wanky, yo's right. dere ain't no-o-o facts. Least ways no facts YOU can get your dumb head around. Go tell yoh nay-bore-hood whatever happens de doydy digger is or'ways raht.
Tosser.
Count it as a win, huh, shit fer brains.
Click to expand...

Someone's getting desperate and quite pathetic. Why don't you list those 'FACTS' that show Murdoch knows what goes on at each and every one of his media outlets.
 
Superfreak said:
Someone's getting desperate and quite pathetic. Why don't you list those 'FACTS' that show Murdoch knows what goes on at each and every one of his media outlets.
Click to expand...

The facts are all around you. I am not an optician, you will have to do the best you can with your blind yank eyes.
 
Lowaicue said:
Newspapers can provide FACTS and they can ALSO provide OPINIONS. The articles he posted are OPINION pieces.
Click to expand...

Gosh, you are so-o-o clever. You changed the name all by yourself? wow, you arsehole yanks are real clever. No wonder you rule the world.[/QUOTE]

Nah.... something was screwy with the quotes.... not really sure what happened there.
 
Superfreak said:
LOL.... which article was that? He has been posting a bunch of OPINION pieces. I provided a list of all the organizations/papers that Murdoch owns. To proclaim that Murdoch himself knows what is going on at each of them is a bit on the absurd side. It would be similar to saying Obama should know what the employees working for the IRS in Austin are doing today.
Click to expand...

You threw in everything but the kitchen sink to deflect attention from the facts in the article posted. This paragraph of facts (below) referred to British papers, not some rinky-dink outpost in Lower Slobbovia. I contend that Murdoch did indeed know what was happening in the London newspaper offices, especially since some of the hacking involved the highest level of government. Did you miss the part where an editor was jailed back in 2007 for hacking into Buckingham Palace voicemails?

Conservatives are just circling the wagons to protect one of their own by claiming the reagan/bush defense for Murdoch: "He wasn't in the loop."

"According to The Guardian, The Independent and the BBC, investigators working for the News of the World, The Sun and The Sunday Times obtained information about Brown's family, his legal, his financial and his medical records. This marks the first time that any allegations about News International have targeted papers outside the News of the World. The Sun allegedly received details about Brown's son, Fraser, who suffers from cystic fibrosis, when he was an infant, and wrote exclusive stories about his then-unknown illness. The Sunday Times allegedly posed as Brown to obtain his personal financial records. His bank, Abbey National, wrote to The Sunday Times charging that "someone from the Sunday Times or acting on its behalf has masqueraded as Mr Brown for the purpose of obtaining information from Abbey National by deception," according to the BBC."

News of the World phone hacking affair
 
Superfreak said:
So the 'facts' are all around yet you are INCAPABLE of posting ANY of them? LMAO.... like I stated, you are pathetic.
Click to expand...

I suspect to read something about chronology at this point, that is always the sign that you have entirely owned him in a debate.
 
christiefan915 said:
You threw in everything but the kitchen sink to deflect attention from the facts in the article posted. This paragraph of facts (below) referred to British papers, not some rinky-dink outpost in Lower Slobbovia. I contend that Murdoch did indeed know what was happening in the London newspaper offices, especially since some of the hacking involved the highest level of government. Did you miss the part where an editor was jailed back in 2007 for hacking into Buckingham Palace voicemails?

Conservatives are just circling the wagons to protect one of their own by claiming the reagan/bush defense for Murdoch: "He wasn't in the loop."

"According to The Guardian, The Independent and the BBC, investigators working for the News of the World, The Sun and The Sunday Times obtained information about Brown's family, his legal, his financial and his medical records. This marks the first time that any allegations about News International have targeted papers outside the News of the World. The Sun allegedly received details about Brown's son, Fraser, who suffers from cystic fibrosis, when he was an infant, and wrote exclusive stories about his then-unknown illness. The Sunday Times allegedly posed as Brown to obtain his personal financial records. His bank, Abbey National, wrote to The Sunday Times charging that "someone from the Sunday Times or acting on its behalf has masqueraded as Mr Brown for the purpose of obtaining information from Abbey National by deception," according to the BBC."

News of the World phone hacking affair
Click to expand...

Again Christie, do you expect Obama to take the blame should some IRS agent in TX break the law? Do you have ANY idea how many media outlets Murdoch owns and how many employees 'work for him'????

I posted a list of all the media he owns.... do you really think he knows what is going on day to day at each of them? While he certainly MAY have, for you and the others to proclaim his guilt based on what has been published so far is nothing short of absurd.
 
christiefan915 said:
You threw in everything but the kitchen sink to deflect attention from the facts in the article posted. This paragraph of facts (below) referred to British papers, not some rinky-dink outpost in Lower Slobbovia. I contend that Murdoch did indeed know what was happening in the London newspaper offices, especially since some of the hacking involved the highest level of government. Did you miss the part where an editor was jailed back in 2007 for hacking into Buckingham Palace voicemails?

Conservatives are just circling the wagons to protect one of their own by claiming the reagan/bush defense for Murdoch: "He wasn't in the loop."

"According to The Guardian, The Independent and the BBC, investigators working for the News of the World, The Sun and The Sunday Times obtained information about Brown's family, his legal, his financial and his medical records. This marks the first time that any allegations about News International have targeted papers outside the News of the World. The Sun allegedly received details about Brown's son, Fraser, who suffers from cystic fibrosis, when he was an infant, and wrote exclusive stories about his then-unknown illness. The Sunday Times allegedly posed as Brown to obtain his personal financial records. His bank, Abbey National, wrote to The Sunday Times charging that "someone from the Sunday Times or acting on its behalf has masqueraded as Mr Brown for the purpose of obtaining information from Abbey National by deception," according to the BBC."

News of the World phone hacking affair
Click to expand...

side note.... you do realize that your link shows they are still trying to prove that the EDITOR of the paper knew what was going on???? Yet you expect us to believe that Murdoch 'KNEW'???
 
Superfreak said:
side note.... you do realize that your link shows they are still trying to prove that the EDITOR of the paper knew what was going on???? Yet you expect us to believe that Murdoch 'KNEW'???
Click to expand...

Actually reading things takes second fiddle to assuming and accusing. I thought you knew that by now.
 
Damocles said:
I suspect to read something about chronology at this point, that is always the sign that you have entirely owned him in a debate.
Click to expand...

This is not a debate. This is stupidity by DY and that other arsehole. They may claim what they wish, I have neither time nor patience to engage them any further.
I guess that, in yank language, is a win. But, of course, the truth will out. I wonder how they will hide then.
 
Lowaicue said:
This is not a debate. This is stupidity by DY and that other arsehole. They may claim what they wish, I have neither time nor patience to engage them any further.
I guess that, in yank language, is a win. But, of course, the truth will out. I wonder how they will hide then.
Click to expand...

Oh, wait. You're the guy who talks how the US isn't totalitarian enough... not the chronology guy. That's right. I get you two mixed up for some reason.
 
Damocles said:
Actually reading things takes second fiddle to assuming and accusing. I thought you knew that by now.
Click to expand...

It seems clear that you do not get accurate and factual news in America. It also seems you have forgotten how these people keep screeching that 'It happened on his watch'.
So Murdoch is not as clever as Obama. Mmm.
 
Damocles said:
Oh, wait. You're the guy who talks how the US isn't totalitarian enough... not the chronology guy. That's right. I get you two mixed up for some reason.
Click to expand...

Now you are just being a twat. I expected more of you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top