50, 57 States

[Cancel 2018. 3]

It's accurate that bells were used as signals, but Paul Revere didn't ring them and the bells were not warnings to the Brtis as Palin said. And it's accurate that Paul Revere warned the British about the mobilization efforts after he was captured, but he didn't do that on his famous ride as Plain claimed. And it's true that warning shots were fired, but Paul Revere didn't sent them as he was Palin claimed.

This nonsense about Palin being right because she was kinda sorta in the ballpark is silly (see also, "Well, John Wayne was from another town in Iowa that begins with 'W'"). It's like claiming that Obama was correct that there are 57 states because the real number is in the 50s.

this

match her exact quotes with actual history and she is wrong. you have to stretch to the farthest corners of the universe in order to interpret her words as correct.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

It's accurate that bells were used as signals, but Paul Revere didn't ring them and the bells were not warnings to the Brtis as Palin said. And it's accurate that Paul Revere warned the British about the mobilization efforts after he was captured, but he didn't do that on his famous ride as Plain claimed. And it's true that warning shots were fired, but Paul Revere didn't sent them as he was Palin claimed.

This nonsense about Palin being right because she was kinda sorta in the ballpark is silly (see also, "Well, John Wayne was from another town in Iowa that begins with 'W'"). It's like claiming that Obama was correct that there are 57 states because the real number is in the 50s.

Bottom line is this.... she bumbled through her original quote, no question. But Yurt was wrong to state that there were No bells, no shots and that he didn't warn the British. As the historian stated, she was probably just lucky to put all those together in the quote rather than actually knowing she was correct.

The other point is that it is quite ridiculous to pretend she made this enormous gaffe. It was not. She had the pieces of the puzzle, she just fucked up putting them together.

A huge gaffe would be fucking up the name of a live Medal of Honor winner with the name of a deceased one.... what makes it even larger is the fact that Obama presented BOTH. How fucking retarded do you have to be to do that?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

this

match her exact quotes with actual history and she is wrong. you have to stretch to the farthest corners of the universe in order to interpret her words as correct.

The above is a complete exaggeration. She had the basic components correct... she just jumbled them all together. You are just trying to grasp on to anything that doesn't make your own comments look quite so retarded.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

The above is a complete exaggeration. She had the basic components correct... she just jumbled them all together. You are just trying to grasp on to anything that doesn't make your own comments look quite so retarded.

right...that is why you don't put up her exact quotes next to actual history, much easier to put head in sand and spout "i'm right, i'm right, neener weiner"

put up her quotes to actual history, i've done it a dozen times, let's see if you can make your case

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

right...that is why you don't put up her exact quotes next to actual history, much easier to put head in sand and spout "i'm right, i'm right, neener weiner"

put up her quotes to actual history, i've done it a dozen times, let's see if you can make your case

As I stated dipshit.... she jumbled everything together in her original quote. For you to state that "you have to stretch to the farthest corners of the universe in order to interpret her words as correct" is nothing more than a pathetic attempt on your part to make yourself not look quite so fucking retarded. It is the HOW she stated it that is wrong. The components were correct.... which you proclaimed were untrue.... in essence she was far closer to being correct than you ever were.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

As I stated dipshit.... she jumbled everything together in her original quote. For you to state that "you have to stretch to the farthest corners of the universe in order to interpret her words as correct" is nothing more than a pathetic attempt on your part to make yourself not look quite so fucking retarded. It is the HOW she stated it that is wrong. The components were correct.... which you proclaimed were untrue.... in essence she was far closer to being correct than you ever were.

still can't put her quotes up to actual history, except to tacitly admit she did in fact bungle it by stating "jumbled"....i guess that is as close as you'll get because you've dug your heels in. was looking forward to you putting up her words to actual history.....oh well