First lady fundraising on taxpayers' dime

Cancel 2018. 3

<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
First lady fundraising on taxpayers' dime


First lady Michelle Obama lands in the Bay Area today for fundraising events related to President Obama's re-election campaign that include an East Bay breakfast produced by star chef Alice Waters and a pricey San Francisco luncheon. But critics said Monday that she is spending taxpayer money to foot much of the bill for her fundraiser-heavy trip to California this week.

...


Presidents and first ladies of both political parties typically raise campaign funds while using public resources to pay for their travels. But Obama's goal to raise $1 billion for his 2012 re-election campaign has handed Republicans an opportunity to attack the White House as Congress debates whether to limit or raise the nation's debt ceiling.

...


Political campaigns typically pay costs related to fundraising events, such as hotels. But the first lady's trip to California involves official transportation from Washington, security, staffing and other expenses - many of which are covered by taxpayers.

The Chronicle contacted the Obama 2012 campaign office on Monday to clarify which expenses are footed by taxpayers. The newspaper was referred to the first lady's office at the White House, which did not respond to e-mailed questions on the matter.

...


Michelle Obama's fundraisers are not as expensive or as large as those on her husband's last trip to the Bay Area in April, when he starred at four fundraising events for his campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Those events ranged from a $35,800-a-person dinner in San Francisco to a sold-out Masonic Auditorium appearance where admission was as low as $25 a person.



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/06/13/MNQT1JT8NI.DTL#ixzz1PH0rUUeb

if both parties do this, why the outcry from the GOP? and why didn't michelle's office respond to the email? as first lady, if she does any fund raising for obama, then some of it will be borne by the tax payers. maybe this is about the amount, or it could just be the start of a long political season running up to the presidential election.


of interesting note is the expensive, tony, dinner hosted by obama for 35K a plate. it cracks me up, because i often see some dems whining about expensive, for the wealthy only, republican fund raiser dinners....yet, they are of course silent about the matter when a dem engages in the same conduct.
 
"because i often see some dems whining about expensive, for the wealthy only, republican fund raiser dinners....yet, they are of course silent about the matter when a dem engages in the same conduct. "

Can you think of a specific time you have heard that?

It would have been from a pretty stupid Dem, because Democrats have been hosting huge$ per plate fundraisers for decades. I'd be interested to see if you can think of one who whined about it...
 
i've seen it on this board, more than once. i've seen it on other boards. i've seen it in comments.

really onceler, MUST DEFEND ANY DEMOCRAT....you always do this when it is a dem, but readily believe anything about a pub when it fits your world view.
 
Can't think of even one, even though you see it so "often"?

Man, is that a shock.

and now onceler will derail the thread with his lies and trolling. i actually thought of more than one and said where i heard or read said comments. then again, i never expect honesty from you.

:rolleyes:
 
It's funny that you see it as "derailing a thread." It's a point you made in the OP; did you want it to go uncontested? Is contesting a point from the OP "derailing?"

I'd be really surprised if you could find even one comment like that, much less enough to support the characterization of "often."
 
what is derailing is claiming i could not "think" of one comment. yet, i mentioned several places where i read the comments. your lies are what derail the thread, then again, if you could read at a fifth grade level, you would have understood that.

FACT: some on the left have made the comment(s)

care to get back to how much tax payer money should be spent? or are you going to obsessively derail yet another thread with your lame lies?
 
That's a strange rebuttal, and wouldn't hold up in formal debate. Am I supposed to just take your word for it?

If it happens so "often," one would certainly think that you'd be able to think of 1 or 2 off the top of your head, and name a few names...
 
The real question is whether the First Lady ought to be fundraising for her husband's re-election campaign. The obvious answer to that question is "Yes, if she wants to." She has a security detail. She cannot fly commercially. Everything she does will cost the taxpayer money. You could literally write a story about "Michele Obama Doing __________ on the Taxpayer's Dime" every time she left the White House to do pretty much anything.
 
That's a strange rebuttal, and wouldn't hold up in formal debate. Am I supposed to just take your word for it?

If it happens so "often," one would certainly think that you'd be able to think of 1 or 2 off the top of your head, and name a few names...

funny how you make claims all the time and never back them up. using your logic now, none of your claims would hold up in a formal debate, which btw...i did not realize this was a formal debate and if it was, you would have lost points for falsifying your opponent's statement. you claim often all the time, yet never come up with any cites, what thread etc....you just thoroughly pwn'd yourself. tff.

evince was one....i don't recall the others here. and again, for someone who NEVER cites, nor mentions a thread, it is truly comical to see you getting in frenzy over this. then again, honesty and standards mean nothing to you.
 
The real question is whether the First Lady ought to be fundraising for her husband's re-election campaign. The obvious answer to that question is "Yes, if she wants to." She has a security detail. She cannot fly commercially. Everything she does will cost the taxpayer money. You could literally write a story about "Michele Obama Doing __________ on the Taxpayer's Dime" every time she left the White House to do pretty much anything.

correct. i wonder if the issue are the other costs. so far, i don't see why the GOP is complaining as i'm sure bush's wife did the same thing. if not her....he certaintly did. and not everything she does should cost the taxpayers money. that is so ludicrious it boggles the mind....then again, since this is a dem i am not surprised you would make such a statement. should we pay her hotel costs? food costs? luggage costs? you said everything....lmao
 
correct. i wonder if the issue are the other costs. so far, i don't see why the GOP is complaining as i'm sure bush's wife did the same thing. if not her....he certaintly did. and not everything she does should cost the taxpayers money. that is so ludicrious it boggles the mind....then again, since this is a dem i am not surprised you would make such a statement. should we pay her hotel costs? food costs? luggage costs? you said everything....lmao


I didn't say taxpayers should pay for everything that she does. I said that everything she does will cost taxpayer money. And I wasn't trying to be exact, ankle-biter.
 
I didn't say taxpayers should pay for everything that she does. I said that everything she does will cost taxpayer money. And I wasn't trying to be exact, ankle-biter.

nice dodge mr. backpeddle....if everything she does will cost the taxpayer money....then should hotels, food, cars, gifts....cost the taxpayer money? you're just pissy because your statement is false and utterly stupid. there is much she does that does not cost the tax payer money....it is cute how you get so angry when you're shown how silly your points are....:)
 
nice dodge mr. backpeddle....if everything she does will cost the taxpayer money....then should hotels, food, cars, gifts....cost the taxpayer money? you're just pissy because your statement is false and utterly stupid. there is much she does that does not cost the tax payer money....it is cute how you get so angry when you're shown how silly your points are....:)

You're tiresome. "Everything she does will cost taxpayer money" is not equivalent to "taxpayer money should pay for everything she does."
 
You're tiresome. "Everything she does will cost taxpayer money" is not equivalent to "taxpayer money should pay for everything she does."

i never said it was fibberfish. whenever you make dumb statements, instead of just saying, yeah, it was dumb, you double down and then spout nonsense. FYI....it only makes you look more of a fool than before. i mean really, claiming everything she does will costs the taxpayers money....such a dumb statement.

you're welcome.
 
i never said it was fibberfish. whenever you make dumb statements, instead of just saying, yeah, it was dumb, you double down and then spout nonsense. FYI....it only makes you look more of a fool than before. i mean really, claiming everything she does will costs the taxpayers money....such a dumb statement.

you're welcome.


Any time the First Lady travels anywhere for any purpose it will cost taxpayers money. She has a security detail. The security detail costs money. Taxpayer money. Now, you can accept that as factually accurate or you can be an ankle-biting nitwit that plays dumbass gotcha games. It's up to you, Crawfish.
 
Can't think of even one, even though you see it so "often"?

Man, is that a shock.

There's no topping the Amazing Yurskin and his Amazing Mental Powers when it comes to backing up his unfounded, anecdotal third-party hearsay with actual facts...
 
There's no topping the Amazing Yurskin and his Amazing Mental Powers when it comes to backing up his unfounded, anecdotal third-party hearsay with actual facts...



psychic-powers.jpg
 
Any time the First Lady travels anywhere for any purpose it will cost taxpayers money. She has a security detail. The security detail costs money. Taxpayer money. Now, you can accept that as factually accurate or you can be an ankle-biting nitwit that plays dumbass gotcha games. It's up to you, Crawfish.

you said "everything"....is that a true statment fibberfish? sorry you believe words don't mean anything, no wonder you think i'm a crawfish. you get to make it up as you go.

oh...77% of americans said obama born in the US...come again fibbercrawfish.
 
Back
Top