Conservatives...

Not really. Liberals prefer there to be no guns in the streets.

Well, as Ice Cube sang in his song Man's Best Friend a gun has replaced a dog as man's best friend. So certain liberals may wish there were no guns. Other liberals don't leave the house without packing.
 
Frightened people who live in perpetual terror carry guns, don't they?
 
Pretty funny. "A hereditary ruling class", wouldn't that be the bush family?

Yes, you are pretty funny.....the Bush 'family' hardly constitutes a class(though they have more class than most Democrats)....at least not any more or less than the Kennedys....
If they were, Jeb would be president instead of the clown now in the White House.....and their sons and daughters would be next in line....
 
Frightened people who live in perpetual terror carry guns, don't they?
Do they ?

Mr. Glenn Anderson of Cedar Rapids, Iowa failed to come to a complete stop at a stop sign one afternoon and was pulled over by a local policeman. He handed the cop his driver's license, insurance verification, and his concealed carry permit.

The cop says, "I see your CCW permit. Are you carrying today?
Yes, sir, I am." "
Then you better tell me what you got."

Glenn says, "Well, I have a .357 revolver in my inside coat pocket, a 9mm semi-auto in the glove box, and I have a .22 magnum derringer in my right boot."

"Okay," the cop says. "Anything else?"

"Yeah, in the trunk there's an AR15 and a 12 gauge shotgun. That's about it."

"Mr. Anderson, are you on the way to or from the range?"
"Nope."
"Well then, what are you afraid of, sir?"
"Not a fucking thing, officer."
 
Yes, you are pretty funny.....the Bush 'family' hardly constitutes a class(though they have more class than most Democrats)....at least not any more or less than the Kennedys....
If they were, Jeb would be president instead of the clown now in the White House.....and their sons and daughters would be next in line....


Read it and weep moron.

From wikipedia;

Patrilineal lineRichard Bush (c. 1696–1732 in Bristol, Plymouth Colony) is believed to be the earliest known patrilineal member of the Bush family. He lived in North America.
Timothy Bush (1728–1851 in Springport, New York) may have been the son of Richard Bush.
Timothy Bush, Jr. (1761–1850 in Penfield, New York) was the son of Timothy Bush.
Obadiah Newcomb Bush (January 28, 1797–1851) was the son of blacksmith Timothy Bush, Jr. and Lydia Newcomb, and was born in Penfield, New York on January 28, 1797. He left home during the War of 1812 and married Harriet Smith (1800–1867) (Cambridge, New York, May 12, 1800 – Cincinnati, Ohio, June 21, 1867), the daughter of Dr. Sanford Smith (1760–1815) (Stonington, Connecticut, February 27, 1760 – Scipio, New York, June 15, 1815) and his wife Priscilla Whippo Smith (1763–1838) (Cambridge, New York, c. 1763 – Pottstown, Pennsylvania, August 26, 1838), in Rochester, New York on November 8, 1821. He and his wife had seven children. Through his son Reverend James Smith Bush (1825–1889), he is the great-great-grandfather of former President George Herbert Walker Bush and the great-great-great-grandfather of President George W. Bush. In Rochester, Obadiah was employed as a schoolmaster and was also a well known abolitionist. He served as vice president of the Anti-Slavery Society and was on a committee to nominate candidates for justice of the peace. His brother Henry, a manufacturer of stoves, was also well known for his involvement in abolitionist activities. He was a participant in the Underground Railroad, and even petitioned the New York State Legislature to secede from the Union in a protest against slavery. The Rochester Daily Advertiser accused him of encouraging "anarchy." Eventually Obadiah, Henry and possibly another brother or two went off to find their fortunes in the California Gold Rush of 1849. After two years of toiling in California he began passage home, by ship, to retrieve his family in New York. He died, however, aboard ship and was given a sea burial. According to the book The Faith of George W. Bush: "[He] left his home during the War of 1812, became a schoolmaster, then caught gold fever and left for California during the Gold Rush of 1849. Two years later, he tried to return home to reclaim his family and take them west. He died in the attempt, though, and was buried at sea. leaving his wife and seven children alone in Rochester, New York."
James Smith Bush (1825–1889), an Episcopal priest in New Jersey, California, and New York, was the son of Obadiah Bush and the father of Samuel Prescott Bush. The first Bush to earn a degree from Yale University, he supported the founding of The Third Society at Yale, now known as Wolf's Head Society.
Other notable relativesGeorge Bush (1796–1859) was a biblical scholar who wrote the book Life of Mohammed, and a cousin of Obadiah Newcomb Bush.
Col. Robert Bolling Sr. (1646–1709) was an Early American settler whose son, Robert Bolling Jr., was a Bush family ancestor. Bolling Sr. later had children with Jane Poythress, the granddaughter of Pocahontas. These children were her only surviving descendants. As a result, all members of the George H. W. Bush family (including his siblings) are relatives of all Pocahontas descendants.
Gov. Thomas Hinckley (1618–1706) was a Plymouth Colony governor, and an ancestor of all members of the George H. W. Bush family (including his siblings).
Mary Parker (1637–92) was executed by hanging in 1692 for witchcraft in the Salem Witch Trials, and a 4th great-grandmother of the Rev. James Smith Bush Esq. (1825–89).[5][6][7]
Philip Sherman (1610–87) was a founder of Rhode Island and an ancestor of all members of the George H.W. Bush family (including his siblings).
Gov. Thomas Mayhew Sr. (1593–1682) was the founder of Martha's Vineyard and an ancestor of all members of the George H. W. Bush family (including his siblings).
Måns Andersson (d. aft. 1679) was a Swedish immigrant and believed to be among the earliest ancestors of the Bush family in North America.
Jonathan Fairbanks (1594–1668) was the builder of the Fairbanks House, the oldest existing house in North America, and was a 4th great grandfather of Obadiah Newcomb Bush.[8] He is also an ancestor of William Howard Taft,[9] Vice President Charles W. Fairbanks[10] and the father and son Governors of Vermont Erastus Fairbanks and Horace Fairbanks.[11]
Rev. John Lothropp (1584–1653) was an ancestor of all members of the George H.W. Bush family (including his siblings). This ancestry makes the Bush family relatives to President Grant as well as Benedict Arnold, among others.
Anne Hutchinson (1591–1643) was a Massachusetts religious dissident and an ancestor of all members of the George H.W. Bush family (including his siblings).[12] This ancestry makes the Bush family relatives of Presidents Washington, Franklin Roosevelt and Coolidge.
Connections to other prominent families
George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush in Beijing, 2008Walker familyGeorge Herbert "Bert" Walker (1875–1953) was a wealthy American banker and businessman. His daughter Dorothy married Prescott Bush, making him the grandfather of the 41st President George H. W. Bush and the great-grandfather of the 43rd President George W. Bush. He is also the namesake of the Walker Cup, a men's amateur golf trophy contested in odd-numbered years between a U.S. team and a combined Great Britain and Ireland side.

Fish familyMain article: Fish family
Samuel Prescott Bush married Flora Sheldon, who had a common ancestor with the Fishes (e.g. Hamilton Fish) and the Keans (e.g. Thomas Kean). Their common ancestor was the famed Robert Livingston the Elder.[13]

Pierce familyFirst Lady Barbara Bush (née Pierce), the wife of George H. W. Bush (the 41st President of the United States) and the mother of George W. Bush (the 43rd President), is descended from a second cousin of Franklin Pierce (14th President).[13]

Other U.S. presidentsPresident George W. Bush is related to other presidents as well as Pierce, to whom he is also related on his father's side via Daniel Brewer. He is also a cousin of Washington (via Hutchinsons), Adams (via Prescotts link to Hoar, through Abigail Adams wife of John Adams),[14] Fillmore (via Millards), Lincoln (via Gilmans), Grant (via Lathrops), Hayes (via Smiths, Footes, Parmelees, and Huckinses), Garfield (via Wheelers, Carpenters, Cookes, Warrens, Holbrooks, and Arnolds), Cleveland (via Smiths and Stanleys), Theodore Roosevelt (via Schuylers), Taft (via Holbrooks, Thayers, Haywards, Cookes, Footes, Ravenses, Waterses, and Shermans), Coolidge (via Phillipses, Hortons, Garnseys, Pulsiphers, Ravenses, Richardsons, Moores, Bulkeleys, and Morses), Hoover (via Brookses, Reades, Wheelers, Richardsons, and Shermans), Franklin Roosevelt (via Beekmans, Hutchinsons, Popes, Jenneys, Richardses, Palgraves, Lathrops, and Howlands), Nixon (via Lippincotts, Footes, Traverses, Morses, and Howlands), Ford (via Vanderburghs, Wheelers, Marvins, Gilmans, and Howlands) and Obama (via Hinckleys). Barbara Pierce Bush is a distant niece of Franklin Pierce.[13]

Barack ObamaGeorge W. Bush, the 43rd U.S. president, and Barack Obama, the 44th president, are 11th cousins through Samuel and Sarah Soole Hinckley of 17th-century Massachusetts.[15]

Kerry familyGeorge W. Bush and his opponent in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election John Kerry share a common ancestor in Edmund Reade (1563–1623) and his wife Elizabeth Cooke. Bush and Kerry are 9th cousins, twice removed.[16]

Sir Winston ChurchillFormer President George W. Bush is related to Winston Churchill three ways: through the Coes of New York, the Sumners of Massachusetts, and the Shermans of Rhode Island
 
Do they? Mr. Glenn Anderson of Cedar Rapids, Iowa failed to come to a complete stop at a stop sign one afternoon and was pulled over by a local policeman. He handed the cop his driver's license, insurance verification, and his concealed carry permit. The cop says, "I see your CCW permit. Are you carrying today?
Yes, sir, I am." " Then you better tell me what you got." Glenn says, "Well, I have a .357 revolver in my inside coat pocket, a 9mm semi-auto in the glove box, and I have a .22 magnum derringer in my right boot." "Okay," the cop says. "Anything else?" "Yeah, in the trunk there's an AR15 and a 12 gauge shotgun. That's about it." "Mr. Anderson, are you on the way to or from the range?" "Nope." "Well then, what are you afraid of, sir?" "Not a fucking thing, officer."

Poor retarded Blabo. SmarterThanFew already tried this pussy tale.

The truth is that someone who's not afraid of 'a fucking thing' wouldn't feel the need to carry a .357 revolver in their inside coat pocket, a 9mm semi-auto in their glove box, and a .22 magnum derringer in their right boot.

What cowards gunlovers are.
 
Not really. Liberals prefer there to be no guns in the streets.

Nice thought, but impossible to accomplish. Even "gun free" societies such as the UK have to deal with gun violence.

Liberalism would be wonderful if it were possible -- there'd be no violence, and therefore no need for guns; everything would be free, nobody would have to work, etc. Liberalism is a fairy tale.
 
Poor retarded Blabo. SmarterThanFew already tried this pussy tale.

The truth is that someone who's not afraid of 'a fucking thing' wouldn't feel the need to carry a .357 revolver in their inside coat pocket, a 9mm semi-auto in their glove box, and a .22 magnum derringer in their right boot.

What cowards gunlovers are.

Circular reasoning is a formal logical fallacy in which the proposition to be proved is assumed implicitly or explicitly in one of the premises. For example:

"Only a coward would carry a weapon. The fact that weapons are used for protection is proof of this."

Such an argument is fallacious, because it relies upon its own proposition — "to protect yourself is cowardly" — in order to support its central premise. Essentially, the argument assumes that its central point is already proven, and uses this in support of itself.

Circular reasoning is different from the informal logical fallacy "begging the question", as it is fallacious due to a flawed logical structure and not the individual falsity of an unstated hidden co-premise as begging the question is.

Its an argument used by under-educated, partisan pinheads to make a convoluted false conclusion appear valid.....
Common to those with mild mental retardation...
 
Circular reasoning is a formal logical fallacy in which the proposition to be proved is assumed implicitly or explicitly in one of the premises. For example: "Only a coward would carry a weapon. The fact that weapons are used for protection is proof of this." Such an argument is fallacious, because it relies upon its own proposition — "to protect yourself is cowardly" — in order to support its central premise. Essentially, the argument assumes that its central point is already proven, and uses this in support of itself. Circular reasoning is different from the informal logical fallacy "begging the question", as it is fallacious due to a flawed logical structure and not the individual falsity of an unstated hidden co-premise as begging the question is. Its an argument used by under-educated, partisan pinheads to make a convoluted false conclusion seem logical.....Common to those with mild mental retardation....http://www.smiliegenerator.de/script/sgp.php?f=13&hf=FFFFFF&rf=000000&tf1=000000&sm=1&text=Schooled



Poor Blabo, reduced to strawmen and readymade cut n' pastes in a vain attempt to seem intelligent


Did I say "Only a coward would carry a weapon. The fact that weapons are used for protection is proof of this"?




Yes, or no?



 
Circular reasoning is a formal logical fallacy in which the proposition to be proved is assumed implicitly or explicitly in one of the premises. For example:

"Only a coward would carry a weapon. The fact that weapons are used for protection is proof of this."

Such an argument is fallacious, because it relies upon its own proposition — "to protect yourself is cowardly" — in order to support its central premise. Essentially, the argument assumes that its central point is already proven, and uses this in support of itself.

Circular reasoning is different from the informal logical fallacy "begging the question", as it is fallacious due to a flawed logical structure and not the individual falsity of an unstated hidden co-premise as begging the question is.

Its an argument used by under-educated, partisan pinheads to make a convoluted false conclusion appear valid.....
Common to those with mild mental retardation...

I would love to see that troll walk through Oakland and tell all the guns owners they are cowards. I'd put the over/under on his surviving at maybe 60 seconds.
 
Poor Blabo, reduced to strawmen and readymade cut n' pastes in a vain attempt to seem intelligent


Did I say "Only a coward would carry a weapon. The fact that weapons are used for protection is proof of this"?


Yes, or no?

smilies-750.png



 
Actually in this case I was thinking more along the lines of not on the battlefield but in America's cities.

Yep; hiding like the whipped dogs that they are.
Letting others to die for them, just so they can attempt to appear to be morally superior; when it's obvious that they are actually morally bankrupt.
 
I don't own any guns. But I also don't adhere to this bizarre notion that carrying makes one a "coward."





People who keep/carry guns simply acknowledge the reality of the world in which we live.







Then you don't 'acknowledge the reality of the world in which we live', Dolt?


Why is that?


Now that your Doltishness has been exposed, again, run back to Olym-puss, Dolt.




inoutugh[1].gif
 

So you admit that I didn't say "Only a coward would carry a weapon. The fact that weapons are used for protection is proof of this"?


But it wasn't a total loss. You got some Dumb Yankee love, Blabo.



retard_ugh_clap[1].gif
 
Back
Top