The US Should Follow China's Lead

Bfgrn

New member
Green China? You'd better believe it

Yanrui Wu
yanrui-wu-thumbnail.jpg


A recent report by the Pew Charitable Trusts shows that China was the world’s number one investor in green energy in 2010.

With a total investment of $54.4 billion, China was well ahead of second-ranked Germany ($41.2 billion) and the US in third place with $34 billion invested, not to mention Australia with $3.3 billion and ranked 12th.

In terms of installed capacity, China’s wind power sector alone doubled every year between 2005 and 2009. According to the latest statistics from the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), China added 18.9 GW of new wind power capacity in 2010, thus overtaking the US with the most installed wind power capacity in the world.

China’s parliament, the National People’s Congress (NPC), recently considered a 'New Energy Industry Development Strategy’ which is to be adopted as a major policy document by the State Council (some changes are expected due to the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster).

According to this proposed development strategy, during 2011-2020, China will invest about $800 billion in seven green energy areas, namely, wind, solar, nuclear, bio-energy, hydro, coal cleaning and smart power grid.

...

China’s economic reform in the last three decades has been successful due to pragmatism (instead of endless ideological debates). It seems pragmatism wins again this time. With a greener Chinese economy, it is certainly good news for the world.

http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/56670.html
 
Too bad we invested our $800 billion in a failed stimulus, huh?

Too bad your information is faulty.

May 26, 2010

Stimulus Package Worked Better Than Projected

The $800 billion economic stimulus package signed into law early last year "has had a slightly bigger effect on the U.S. economy than was projected when it was passed more than a year ago," the Wall Street Journal reports.

"Through the first quarter of 2010, the stimulus boosted employment by an estimated 1.3 million to 2.8 million jobs, about a quarter or half million more than projected. Gross domestic product was 1.7 to 4.1 percentage points higher than it would have been without the stimulus."

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/05/26/stimulus_package_worked_better_than_projected.html
 
Green China? You'd better believe it

Yanrui Wu
yanrui-wu-thumbnail.jpg


A recent report by the Pew Charitable Trusts shows that China was the world’s number one investor in green energy in 2010.

With a total investment of $54.4 billion, China was well ahead of second-ranked Germany ($41.2 billion) and the US in third place with $34 billion invested, not to mention Australia with $3.3 billion and ranked 12th.

In terms of installed capacity, China’s wind power sector alone doubled every year between 2005 and 2009. According to the latest statistics from the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), China added 18.9 GW of new wind power capacity in 2010, thus overtaking the US with the most installed wind power capacity in the world.

China’s parliament, the National People’s Congress (NPC), recently considered a 'New Energy Industry Development Strategy’ which is to be adopted as a major policy document by the State Council (some changes are expected due to the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster).

According to this proposed development strategy, during 2011-2020, China will invest about $800 billion in seven green energy areas, namely, wind, solar, nuclear, bio-energy, hydro, coal cleaning and smart power grid.

...

China’s economic reform in the last three decades has been successful due to pragmatism (instead of endless ideological debates). It seems pragmatism wins again this time. With a greener Chinese economy, it is certainly good news for the world.

http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/56670.html
I'm on board. Except it's not a fair to compare the two. China is having it's industrial revolution, long after we've had ours and established our respective industries.
 
I'm on board. Except it's not a fair to compare the two. China is having it's industrial revolution, long after we've had ours and established our respective industries.

"We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win."
President John F. Kennedy - September 12, 1962

jfkrice.jpg


The great French Marshall Lyautey once asked his gardener to plant a tree. The gardener objected that the tree was slow growing and would not reach maturity for 100 years. The Marshall replied, 'In that case, there is no time to lose; plant it this afternoon!'
President John F. Kennedy
 
From a pragmatic standpoint the moon landing was entirely wasteful. It was done, primarily, to deny it to the USSR. It was not something we built a significant industry on, or the foundation of our industrial principles.
 
Obama promised under 8% unemployment and better GDP last year from the stimulus. Huge failure, not to the clowns not paying taxes anyway though they don't have to foot the bill.
 
Obama promised under 8% unemployment and better GDP last year from the stimulus. Huge failure, not to the clowns not paying taxes anyway though they don't have to foot the bill.

For the Americans to go to the moon was a wonderful achievement. The error lay in their return
 
For the Americans to go to the moon was a wonderful achievement. The error lay in their return

This made me chuckle. Yeah, we should have gone on to colonize the moon as well as the rest of the solar system before a bunch of whiney socialists took over and we no longer had money to spend on exploration.
 
Back
Top