Mitt Romney announces exploratory committee for presidential bid

This must have been from the "No Duh!" section of the News... I mean, who didn't think Mitt was going to throw his hat in that ring?
 
King of Gods said:
Reporting from Washington—Mitt Romney is taking the first step toward a full-blown presidential campaign, announcing Monday the formation of an exploratory committee that's likely the precursor to his second White House run.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-romney-campaign-20110412,0,3318322.story?track=rss

Excellent news! I firmly believe Mitt will be our next President.
Click to expand...

He's got to much crap on his hands.

I think he's only in it for the money he can raise.
 
King of Guns said:
I can only trust that you are wrong. No good can come from Romney. He is an enemy of the people.
Click to expand...

If you asked me in late 2007 / early 2008, I would have had the same response. However, I have since observed many Reagan-esque qualities in Romney. I believe he has what it takes to be a great President, a great leader.
 
King of Gods said:
If you asked me in late 2007 / early 2008, I would have had the same response. However, I have since observed many Reagan-esque qualities in Romney. I believe he has what it takes to be a great President, a great leader.
Click to expand...

Let's wait and see what happens in the next 12 months.

A lot can happen by then.
 
Romney and I are much alike. The only difference is that whereas he is working to become a god, I have already achieved this.
 
Onceler said:
The GOP field right now looks incredibly weak....
Click to expand...

In comparison to The Obama? :)

monthly_approval_index_march_2011.jpg
 
I dont particularly like many of his political positions, but he is a reasonable man and I would be okay with him being president. He would be better than W, by a degree of about 1000.
 
If the Republicans nominate Palin or Gingrich or some yokle like that I will be very discusted and feel like I did when they nominated Bush. If they nominate Romney or this guy who is ambassador to China or some others... I will not likely vote for them, but I will agree that they are fairly reasonable and that the nation will be in good hands, just not hands I agree with.
 
(REASONABLENESS FOR PRESIDENT CONTINUEM)

( SILLY )Bozo the Clown>>>GWB>>>>>>>Sarah Palin>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Newt Gingrich>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>///>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(Mitt Romney,Barak Obama,Bill Clinton,George Bush Sr.,,Ronald Reagan, James Carter, ect.,)....(REASONABLE)
 
Jarod said:
(REASONABLENESS FOR PRESIDENT CONTINUEM)

( SILLY )Bozo the Clown>>>GWB>>>>>>>Sarah Palin>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Newt Gingrich>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>///>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(Mitt Romney,Barak Obama,Bill Clinton,George Bush Sr.,,Ronald Reagan, James Carter, ect.,)....(REASONABLE)
Click to expand...

Carter was a horrible President. Bush Sr. was not much better. Obama has been a pathetic President thus far. Reagan and Clinton are the only two on your list that were effective leaders.
 
I am not talking about disagreeing with policies, I am talking about ineptness and intelegence to stand in the office. I disagreed a lot with much or what Reagan did and more so with Bush Sr., but they were qualified for the job. There is a difference. Many disagreed with Carter, but he was qualified and intelegent enough for the job.
 
Jarod said:
I am not talking about disagreeing with policies, I am talking about ineptness and intelegence to stand in the office. I disagreed a lot with much or what Reagan did and more so with Bush Sr., but they were qualified for the job. There is a difference. Many disagreed with Carter, but he was qualified and intelegent enough for the job.
Click to expand...

Being 'intelligent' does not make one a good President by itself. Carter, Obama and Bush Sr were all 'intelligent' enough.... yet none of them were/are effective leaders.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top