Alaska nominee says sex outside of marriage should be illegal

Rana said:
Would your mother or sister pose for these types of pictures and why do you suppose these young women do it? Surely they know what could happen with these types of pictures of them?
Click to expand...

Since Mom is dead, I can't ask her. My sister might have in her younger and wilder days.

I can only guess why these women pose for these pictures. Some find it arousing to do. Some (probably most) do it for the money. I have no problems with the pics per se. But I think there is an appropriate place for them.
 
WinterBorn said:
Since Mom is dead, I can't ask her. My sister might have in her younger and wilder days.

I can only guess why these women pose for these pictures. Some find it arousing to do. Some (probably most) do it for the money. I have no problems with the pics per se. But I think there is an appropriate place for them.
Click to expand...

I guess I just don't get all bent out of shape over a few scantly clad females who weren't forced to pose for these pictures. I guess 3D could run a warning for all you prim and proper people who don't wish to look at over processed boobs! If I don't want to look, or keep looking, I just go to another thread! Or like someone else suggested, you could IA him.

I, also find it hilarious who the one is that is protesting these pictures! I find her faux righteousness more alarming than 3D's pictures. She never jumped on the bandwagon when Darla was complaining about some of the men on this forum being sexist! I just find it hilarious she is doing it now.

I usually agree with you on issues, but not on this one, at least 3D has never made any vulgar remarks about children, so her fake prim and proper act just doesn't fly with some of us! Her being offended by pictures, well, I just don't believe it. It was just a reason to get on 3D because she doesn't like him. She probably has some internet pictures out there in cyberspace that she is worried he might post and that is the reason she is concerned. She has objectified herself and now she is worried! She should not have sent those pics of herself into Beaver magazine!
 
Rana said:
I guess I just don't get all bent out of shape over a few scantly clad females who weren't forced to pose for these pictures. I guess 3D could run a warning for all you prim and proper people who don't wish to look at over processed boobs! If I don't want to look, or keep looking, I just go to another thread! Or like someone else suggested, you could IA him.

I, also find it hilarious who the one is that is protesting these pictures! I find her faux righteousness more alarming than 3D's pictures. She never jumped on the bandwagon when Darla was complaining about some of the men on this forum being sexist! I just find it hilarious she is doing it now.

I usually agree with you on issues, but not on this one, at least 3D has never made any vulgar remarks about children, so her fake prim and proper act just doesn't fly with some of us! Her being offended by pictures, well, I just don't believe it. It was just a reason to get on 3D because she doesn't like him. She probably has some internet pictures out there in cyberspace that she is worried he might post and that is the reason she is concerned. She has objectified herself and now she is worried! She should not have sent those pics of herself into Beaver magazine!
Click to expand...

I like 3-d just fine...I don't like his posting the picture of a nude woman bent forward with her ass in the air and his comment "I'd do her doggy style". My other interactions with mattress-back. you, or with anyone else are in no way connected to what I have had to say to or about that post. Your NEED to connect them says just what a stupid disingenuous person you are....
 
Rana said:
I guess I just don't get all bent out of shape over a few scantly clad females who weren't forced to pose for these pictures. I guess 3D could run a warning for all you prim and proper people who don't wish to look at over processed boobs! If I don't want to look, or keep looking, I just go to another thread! Or like someone else suggested, you could IA him.

I, also find it hilarious who the one is that is protesting these pictures! I find her faux righteousness more alarming than 3D's pictures. She never jumped on the bandwagon when Darla was complaining about some of the men on this forum being sexist! I just find it hilarious she is doing it now.

I usually agree with you on issues, but not on this one, at least 3D has never made any vulgar remarks about children, so her fake prim and proper act just doesn't fly with some of us! Her being offended by pictures, well, I just don't believe it. It was just a reason to get on 3D because she doesn't like him. She probably has some internet pictures out there in cyberspace that she is worried he might post and that is the reason she is concerned. She has objectified herself and now she is worried! She should not have sent those pics of herself into Beaver magazine!
Click to expand...

Canada's The Beaver magazine renamed to end porn mix-up
(AFP) – Jan 12, 2010

OTTAWA — Canada's second-oldest magazine, The Beaver, is changing its name after 90 years because the title is too often censored by online porn filters, preventing it from reaching new online readers.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hJrLjBHj_y8G7OFPAZZmOhUL10Bw
 
apple0154 said:
Canada's The Beaver magazine renamed to end porn mix-up
(AFP) – Jan 12, 2010

OTTAWA — Canada's second-oldest magazine, The Beaver, is changing its name after 90 years because the title is too often censored by online porn filters, preventing it from reaching new online readers.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hJrLjBHj_y8G7OFPAZZmOhUL10Bw
Click to expand...

I heard the owner was sick of being confused with porn, so he was renaming the magazine after his pet cat. The magazine will now be called "Coochie".
 
Awhile back on Tosh.0, he trotted out a hotel in France called the Hotel Kuntz. It was like, great, I get to go sleep with a bunch of kuntz tonight!! :cof1:
 
Rana said:
I guess I just don't get all bent out of shape over a few scantly clad females who weren't forced to pose for these pictures. I guess 3D could run a warning for all you prim and proper people who don't wish to look at over processed boobs! If I don't want to look, or keep looking, I just go to another thread! Or like someone else suggested, you could IA him.

I, also find it hilarious who the one is that is protesting these pictures! I find her faux righteousness more alarming than 3D's pictures. She never jumped on the bandwagon when Darla was complaining about some of the men on this forum being sexist! I just find it hilarious she is doing it now.

I usually agree with you on issues, but not on this one, at least 3D has never made any vulgar remarks about children, so her fake prim and proper act just doesn't fly with some of us! Her being offended by pictures, well, I just don't believe it. It was just a reason to get on 3D because she doesn't like him. She probably has some internet pictures out there in cyberspace that she is worried he might post and that is the reason she is concerned. She has objectified herself and now she is worried! She should not have sent those pics of herself into Beaver magazine!
Click to expand...


Ahem! Please! I don't necessarily think there is anything wrong with you looking at, being in to, peering, or salivating over Beaver Magazine, but aren't you babysitting youngsters over there?

By the way. If D were on fire, I'd be hard pressed to spit on her, but that's just me ya know.
 
Ice Dancer said:
I like 3-d just fine...I don't like his posting the picture of a nude woman bent forward with her ass in the air and his comment "I'd do her doggy style". My other interactions with mattress-back. you, or with anyone else are in no way connected to what I have had to say to or about that post. Your NEED to connect them says just what a stupid disingenuous person you are....
Click to expand...

Does this mean she doesn't have you on ignore after all?!!??!!!???

:rofl:​
 
usaloyal2theend said:
Ahem! Please! I don't necessarily think there is anything wrong with you looking at, being in to, peering, or salivating over Beaver Magazine, but aren't you babysitting youngsters over there?

By the way. If D were on fire, I'd be hard pressed to spit on her, but that's just me ya know.
Click to expand...

I seem to recall that the girl on girl thing runs in her family, so her wanting/liking a little beaver action seem apropos'. Ain't D always burning?
 
Ice Dancer said:
Ever since I've known her she has used the revolving door mode with her IA where you and I are concerned- that and creating troll accounts.
Click to expand...

She sure seems to be bringing D up a lot lately.

Something brewing in Salem? Eye of newt, toe of frog?

witch1.gif
 
Rana said:
Ahahahahahaha! nothing wrong with a little experimentation, I have no idea what gold digger, Icey is talking about, but I am sure makes sense in her email spamming brain!
Click to expand...

WOW you really got that cackle down pat there toe of frog! Now can you explain the rest of your nonsensical idiocy???:confused:??? :rofl:
 
I'm pretty sure the anti-homosexuality verses in the Bible only apply to 1) gay men 2) bull dykes.

After all, why would God disapprove of something so marvelous as this? :)

4490~Kiss-Posters.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top