Alaska nominee says sex outside of marriage should be illegal

Basically, what I am stating. Is if it can be TV14, or won't make a movie more than PG-13 if it were in the movie (picture and comment), it won't be considered porn by the Staff. It may be offensive, even sexist, but neither of those are against the rules.

Personally I shut off pictures and avatars while at work because I know some of the images will be inappropriate for the workplace. However, inappropriate for the workplace is certainly not a determining factor in porn. There are many images that are not porn that would also not be appropriate in the workplace. Full frontal nudity = no. Some back-cleavage with none of the important bits showing... sexist... not porn.
 
Damocles said:
Basically, what I am stating. Is if it can be TV14, or won't make a movie more than PG-13 if it were in the movie (picture and comment), it won't be considered porn by the Staff. It may be offensive, even sexist, but neither of those are against the rules.

Personally I shut off pictures and avatars while at work because I know some of the images will be inappropriate for the workplace. However, inappropriate for the workplace is certainly not a determining factor in porn. There are many images that are not porn that would also not be appropriate in the workplace. Full frontal nudity = no. Some back-cleavage with none of the important bits showing... sexist... not porn.
Click to expand...

Yes, Damo, I get that you will/are going to parse this to kingdom come...it still does not change the fact that it was a nude photo(against the rules) and that it was pornagraphic; both in it's sexualized pose and the degrading sexual comment that accompanied it..."Staff" has always been subjective to the gobbly-goop rules that are rules in name only... I get that too- Further it is typical that you as a man have chosen to say it's OK to post a nude photo of a woman with her ass sticking out in the air a suggestive manner~ Even though your gobbly-goop rules clearly state "NO NUDE PHOTOS"...got it!

As to directing me to shut off avatars and images...reminds me of how teachers are dealing with the trouble in our public classrooms.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Oh no Fox would never, ever do that! Holy fuck balls DY, Fox does practically nothing but that. They pick an extreme and demonize it or they try to spin that what their opponents are doing is extreme when in fact Fox has the extremist position. So using your own logic then it is quite clear that Fox has lost the debate. I agree with you.
Click to expand...

From lame to lamer; FAIL to stick to the subject.
 
christiefan915 said:
Let's just say that for somebody who's rightfully criticized DY for his tasteless comments about you and/or your family, you seem to turn a blind eye to all the times she's done the very same thing to those she despises.
Click to expand...

For the record. I have never made any sexual comments about another poster's family.
 
Ice Dancer said:
Yes, Damo, I get that you will/are going to parse this to kingdom come...it still does not change the fact that it was a nude photo(against the rules) and that it was pornagraphic; both in it's sexualized pose and the degrading sexual comment that accompanied it..."Staff" has always been subjective to the gobbly-goop rules that are rules in name only... I get that too- Further it is typical that you as a man have chosen to say it's OK to post a nude photo of a woman with her ass sticking out in the air a suggestive manner~ Even though your gobbly-goop rules clearly state "NO NUDE PHOTOS"...got it!

As to directing me to shut off avatars and images...reminds me of how teachers are dealing with the trouble in our public classrooms.
Click to expand...

And I get that you are going to repeat the argument that any photo you find sexist is porn. It isn't. If it can make it onto the public airwaves without being censored we will not consider it porn. Even if you really really believe really really hard that it is. Unless it is about a child, then you will be banned every time all the time.

Now you can accept it or get mad again and repeat that this photo that could be shown on TV, even with the comment appended, is "porn" because it is "sexist" and "objectifies" women. You can even curse and tell me how much you hate that I won't ban sexist stuff because you get offended. However, it isn't porn. It's not going to be considered porn, even if you tell me again that it is sexist. If you have a better argument for some reason I should consider a photo that could be shown on TV without censorship "porn" then present it.

No matter how many times you repeat it, Sexist does not equal "Porn".
 
Damocles said:
And I get that you are going to repeat the argument that any photo you find sexist is porn. It isn't. If it can make it onto the public airwaves without being censored we will not consider it porn. Even if you really really believe really really hard that it is. Unless it is about a child, then you will be banned every time all the time.

Now you can accept it or get mad again and repeat that this photo that could be shown on TV, even with the comment appended, is "porn" because it is "sexist" and "objectifies" women than you can repeat it. You can even curse and tell me how much you hate that I won't ban sexist stuff because you get offended. However, it isn't porn. It's not going to be considered porn, even if you tell me again that it is sexist.
Click to expand...

The photo in question IS and it is also a NUDE photo. I see, Damo, you need to have the last word on this as well as be the master of your meaningless rules? And amazingly you seem to miss the fact that I already acknwedged that YOU don't consider it porn. I have never asked you or anyone to consider any other fucking picture then this one as porn...I have stated clearly that I think this kind of posting is common with 3d. I curse because I can... kind of like you have imbecilic meaningless rules because you can- Try and keep up :D
 
Last edited:
Softcore pornography is a form of filmic or photographic pornography or erotica that is less sexually explicit than hardcore pornography. Softcore pornography depicts nude and semi-nude performers engaging in casual social nudity or non-graphic representations of sexual intercourse or masturbation. Softcore porn precludes explicit depictions of vaginal or anal penetration, cunnilingus, fellatio and ejaculation. Visual representations of genitalia (full nudity) are typically permissible in a softcore context in printed media,[1] and increasingly so in film[2] and television.[3] Erections of the penis may not be allowed (see Mull of Kintyre Test), although attitudes towards this are changing.[4]
Portions of images which are considered too explicit may be obscured (censored) through various means. These techniques include the use of draped hair or clothing, carefully positioned hands or other body parts, carefully positioned foreground elements in the scene (often plants or drapery), and carefully chosen camera angles.
 
ID the paradox.

If you engage her insult for insult, you're a "crotch sniffer, c*nt, bitch", and every other vulgar and/or sexual pejorative she can think of.

If you ignore her or refuse to respond, you're a "pollyanna, hypocrite, phony, shameless", and every other vulgar and/or sexual pejorative she can think of.

The bottom line? ID has no intention of ever stopping the lying, sh*t-stirring and taunting because that's what her narcissism feeds on.

(Oh, btw ID: I'm 5'9" tall and my BMI is 19.2 so you can put that fat business to rest already. :D)
 
christiefan915 said:
ID the paradox.

If you engage her insult for insult, you're a "crotch sniffer, c*nt, bitch", and every other vulgar and/or sexual pejorative she can think of.

If you ignore her or refuse to respond, you're a "pollyanna, hypocrite, phony, shameless", and every other vulgar and/or sexual pejorative she can think of.

The bottom line? ID has no intention of ever stopping the lying, sh*t-stirring and taunting because that's what her narcissism feeds on.

(Oh, btw ID: I'm 5'9" tall and my BMI is 19.2 so you can put that fat business to rest already. :D)
Click to expand...

Chris the disingenuous hypocrite...ID stirs shit-yes, folks ignore chris's need to plop her 5'9" saggy ass down in this thread to rail about me- Yes, chris, as you followed me around the internet searching about my house and my life I called you a a"crotch sniffer" and I still call you one.

You come into a thread and make it about me instead of the issue...but yeah I am the shit stirrer. Take out the hypocrite mirror chris and take a good long look- and btw it is not "ignoring someone" when you discuss them on a public forum and then act like some whiny assed bitch when they address you for it.
 
Last edited:
Ice Dancer said:
Chris the disingenuous hypocrite...ID stirs shit-yes, folks ignore chris's need to plop her 5'9" saggy ass down in this thread to rail about me- Yes, chris, as you followed me around the internet searching about my house and my life I called you a a"croth sniffer" and I still call you one.

You come into a thread and make it about me instead of the issue...but yeah I am the shit stirrer. Take out the hypocrite mirror chris and take a good long look- and btw it is not "ignoring someone" when you discuss them on a public forum and then act like some whiny assed bitch when they address you for it.
Click to expand...

Q. E. D. :lol:
 
christiefan915 said:
ID the paradox.

If you engage her insult for insult, you're a "crotch sniffer, c*nt, bitch", and every other vulgar and/or sexual pejorative she can think of.

If you ignore her or refuse to respond, you're a "pollyanna, hypocrite, phony, shameless", and every other vulgar and/or sexual pejorative she can think of.

The bottom line? ID has no intention of ever stopping the lying, sh*t-stirring and taunting because that's what her narcissism feeds on.

(Oh, btw ID: I'm 5'9" tall and my BMI is 19.2 so you can put that fat business to rest already. :D)
Click to expand...

5'9" tall and my BMI is 19.2, huh?

Hi, I'm Apple. Nice to meet you. :D
 
Ice Dancer said:
Yes, Damo, I get that you will/are going to parse this to kingdom come...it still does not change the fact that it was a nude photo(against the rules) and that it was pornagraphic; both in it's sexualized pose and the degrading sexual comment that accompanied it..."Staff" has always been subjective to the gobbly-goop rules that are rules in name only... I get that too- Further it is typical that you as a man have chosen to say it's OK to post a nude photo of a woman with her ass sticking out in the air a suggestive manner~ Even though your gobbly-goop rules clearly state "NO NUDE PHOTOS"...got it!

As to directing me to shut off avatars and images...reminds me of how teachers are dealing with the trouble in our public classrooms.
Click to expand...

Oh for gawdsakes! Have you ever not known a man to bend the rules when it comes to female nudity. All you hear is hypocritcal, "butts, perhaps, in this case,however, well when you hold it just so under that light"...

Nothing new under the sun. Damo's just as pervy as the next guy and this Buddhism malarkey is just that. The Dalai Lama would be impressed!

It plays well in certain threads and allows for a good nite's rest with his daughter in the room next door.
 
usaloyal2theend said:
Oh for gawdsakes! Have you ever not known a man to bend the rules when it comes to female nudity. All you hear is hypocritcal, "butts, perhaps, in this case,however, well when you hold it just so under that light"...

Nothing new under the sun. Damo's just as pervy as the next guy and this Buddhism malarkey is just that. The Dalai Lama would be impressed!

It plays well in certain threads and allows for a good nite's rest with his daughter in the room next door.
Click to expand...

Having spent several years of my youth drawing and painting the female form both clothed and naked I can tell you that 'attraction' can exist without the need for eroticism and vice (if you'll excuse the word) versa.
However the language you use and the way you treat others is, far far worse than pictures of semi clad women could ever be. If you wish to take the high ground then I suggest that you start by climbing out of the pit in which you and your friend seem quite happy to inhabit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top