Alaska nominee says sex outside of marriage should be illegal

Ice Dancer said:
Level of censorship? How about just applying the rules? You totally fucking suck. The point is the picture was nude and it was accompanied by the statement I'd do her doggy style"...totally in breaking with rule 12. SCOTUS ruling was on hard core porn... you're now, without a doubt, subjective rules...do not make clear anything other than: 12.-No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification.

I think you should just say in the rules, that when you feel like pulling a rule out you will...and be done with your stupid rules... 3-d is a young sexist pig. The volume and content of his offerings are often, as in this instance, degrading and do nothing but sexualize women!
Click to expand...

Yes, I've read your reasoning, insulting the staff isn't making it any better. Based on this reasoning American Pie would be porn rather than simply rated "R". It's total rubbish. In fact, that picture with that teener remark is best set at PG-13. It isn't porn, because it isn't, IMO. However, I am giving people a voice here. Convince me with other than cursing and insults, and adding to the argument rather than repeating the same thing continuously. We've heard this argument, it is unconvincing.
 
porn?

3661162090_1530a84cb9.jpg
 
I can respect ID's beliefs about risque pictures being degrading. What I do object to is the argument that one need stand in another's shoes to state an opinion. An educated man or woman can pass off praise or criticism onto any other person, within reason, regardless of sex, race, age, creed, disability, or national origin.
 
King of Hoops said:
I can respect ID's beliefs about risque pictures being degrading. What I do object to is the argument that one need stand in another's shoes to state an opinion. An educated man or woman can pass off praise or criticism onto any other person, within reason, regardless of sex, race, age, creed, disability, or national origin.
Click to expand...

Racists can be and are educated...same with sexist pigs...making their opinions on the matter of their own character flaws moot.
 
Damocles said:
Yes, I've read your reasoning, insulting the staff isn't making it any better. Based on this reasoning American Pie would be porn rather than simply rated "R". It's total rubbish. In fact, that picture with that teener remark is best set at PG-13. It isn't porn, because it isn't, IMO. However, I am giving people a voice here. Convince me with other than cursing and insults, and adding to the argument rather than repeating the same thing continuously. We've heard this argument, it is unconvincing.
Click to expand...

I have already accepted your >fucking< opinion on the matter Damo...it's >bullshit< and your support of it notwithstanding your response here, has not changed my opinion....you can now just accept my opinion of "staff" I guess. Your rules are >bullshit< subjective gobbly goop...I got it.

The rule stated clearly no nude pictures. It further delineated graphic sex talk... So I guess you can just go doggy stlye my cursing and insults and >fuck< the hell off~
 
Yurt said:
chill out....i wasn't even replying to you

do yiou think that picture is porn?
Click to expand...

You chill out...I guess my response to the picture already answered your stupid question~

That men in the 21st century don't want to hear that posting nude and semi nude pictures is porn, especially when combined with making sexual comments about said pictures, is proof of their sexist bullshit. And yes, it means that sexism is still alive and well.
 
Ice Dancer said:
You chill out...I guess my response to the picture already answered your stupid question~

That men in the 21st century don't want to hear that posting nude and semi nude pictures is porn, especially when combined with making sexual comments about said pictures, is proof of their sexist bullshit. And yes, it means that sexism is still alive and well.
Click to expand...

It means that men find women beautiful.

I do have a question for you. If you feel posting pictures of semi-nude women is wrong what is your attitude towards women dressing in a semi-nude fashion?
 
apple0154 said:
It means that men find women beautiful.

I do have a question for you. If you feel posting pictures of semi-nude women is wrong what is your attitude towards women dressing in a semi-nude fashion?
Click to expand...

Are you really that stupid apple? Or is it that I am supposed to be that stupid? 3d regularly posts nude and or erotic pictures of women often accomapnied WITH a sexual comment-sexist and demeaning in content because it objectifies women. This is no fucking art gallery -it's art erotica-it's fucking sexist and it IS SOFT CORE PORN by every definition...and golly gee wiz a bunch of fucking men won't admit to it...WOW.
 
Ice Dancer said:
Hey, Tom, since I know it's the only way you'll get any...go fuck yourself :D

Was that pornographic? You really suck at being creative; interestingly ironic; or funny~
Click to expand...

I consider that comment to be sexist and what's infinitely worse, desperately unfunny.

A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. -- William James
 
Last edited:
Ya'll lighten up, willya? ID sees the combination of pics and comments as sexist. The rest of you see it as entertainment. The pic of Farrah is not even close to what was posted, even without the "doggystyle" comment.

And ID, these guys will not change what they see and what they do. Put them on ignore or change the settings so the pics don't show.
 
WinterBorn said:
Ya'll lighten up, willya? ID sees the combination of pics and comments as sexist. The rest of you see it as entertainment. The pic of Farrah is not even close to what was posted, even without the "doggystyle" comment.

And ID, these guys will not change what they see and what they do. Put them on ignore or change the settings so the pics don't show.
Click to expand...

If you wish to do your Sir Galahad act, you ought to find a more suitable damsel in distress.
 
tom prendergast said:
If you wish to do your Sir Galahad act, you ought to find a more suitable damsel in distress.
Click to expand...

Sir Galahad act? LMAO!

I am not agreeing with her. I am simply trying to keep the topic off petty arguments.

But if you want to defend posting the pics and the "I'd do her doggystyle" comments, feel free. But would you post those if your Mom or your sister were a member of our forum? There have been numerous threads that have crossed the line of good taste.

But if dismissing my comments and attempts at ending the nonsense makes you feel better (and allows you one more shot at ID), go right ahead.
 
WinterBorn said:
Sir Galahad act? LMAO!

I am not agreeing with her. I am simply trying to keep the topic off petty arguments.

But if you want to defend posting the pics and the "I'd do her doggystyle" comments, feel free. But would you post those if your Mom or your sister were a member of our forum? There have been numerous threads that have crossed the line of good taste.

But if dismissing my comments and attempts at ending the nonsense makes you feel better (and allows you one more shot at ID), go right ahead.
Click to expand...

The picture was by no means tasteless, the doggy style comment a little bit but we are all supposed to be adults here. My God, even US comedy shows like 2 and 1/2 men, How I Met Your Mother etc. joke about such things.
 
Ice Dancer said:
Are you really that stupid apple? Or is it that I am supposed to be that stupid? 3d regularly posts nude and or erotic pictures of women often accomapnied WITH a sexual comment-sexist and demeaning in content because it objectifies women. This is no fucking art gallery -it's art erotica-it's fucking sexist and it IS SOFT CORE PORN by every definition...and golly gee wiz a bunch of fucking men won't admit to it...WOW.
Click to expand...

The great majority of pictures posted by 3-D were not accompanied by any comments and many were simply part of his signature line.

I'd still appreciate an answer to my question, "If you feel posting pictures of semi-nude women is wrong what is your attitude towards women dressing in a semi-nude fashion?"

If a picture is supposedly denoting “something” then it must mean that “something” took place. For example, if a picture portrays a person wearing a mask and silly outfit on October 31st. it’s reasonable to conclude the person was dressed for Halloween. Or if a picture shows a man wearing a helmet, slightly soiled clothes and steel-toed boots it’s logical to conclude the man was dressed in work clothes.

Surely it must follow if a picture of a woman in a bathing suit or shorts and tank top or other apparel is considered porno then it’s logical to conclude the woman was dressed in a pornographic manner. What other logical conclusion can be drawn?

So, I’m asking, if you feel certain pictures depicting the dress of women are pornographic do you believe dressing in such a manner is pornographic?
 
Damn Yankee said:
Lame, trying to change the subject. Besides they're the most trusted cable news source, so you paint "most" with "extreme". FAIL.
Click to expand...

Oh no Fox would never, ever do that! Holy fuck balls DY, Fox does practically nothing but that. They pick an extreme and demonize it or they try to spin that what their opponents are doing is extreme when in fact Fox has the extremist position. So using your own logic then it is quite clear that Fox has lost the debate. I agree with you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top