Alaska nominee says sex outside of marriage should be illegal

Ice Dancer said:
Is the picture nudity? yes. Is it sexually suggestive nudity? yes. Does the statement made with the post claim "I'd do her doggy style" further suggets it's sexual intent? yes. **Is it also sexually demeaning to women? yes. The rules are clear...that is until you make excuses and invent caveats.

*12. No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification.

**This forum has been created to encourage a higher level of conversation and debate. This forum inherits all site wide rules, and has some additional caveats:

1) No slurs directed at an individual based on race, ethnicity, sex, or sexual orientation
Click to expand...

Looks like you've summed it up nicely. :good4u:
 
apple0154 said:
You bring up a good point. While not in specific reference to ID one thing that gets under my skin is adults who, while having enjoyed their youth, attempt to prohibit young people from enjoying theirs.

Reminds me of a lady I used to know who enjoyed films. As soon as a new movie came out she's see it and then tell my wife and I (now Ex-wife) whether the movie was any good. More often than not we'd hear "Don't go see that movie. It's terrible." Of course, she had seen it.

Anyway, being my usual self :) , my wife and I decided to see a movie the first day of release and proceeded to tell our friend it wasn't any good. "Don't bother going to see that movie", we said. Her response was, "Oh, I have to go see it. I like the main character."

The point being she would deny the experience to others but not to herself.

I feel better having got that off my chest. :rofl:
Click to expand...

Reminds me of the old spinster who called her local police station to complain that workmen outside were whistling dirty songs!
 
Damn Yankee said:
Looks like you've summed it up nicely. :good4u:
Click to expand...

Yes, I did, because the written rules are clear, but you would never know it based on the subjectivity as expressed by some mods. What I have come to understand is that the rules on here are basically nothing but subjective bullshit; applied to some posters and not others; to this post and that one- but not to others~
 
apple0154 said:
Don't be too hard on him, ID. The book is supposed to be "educational" and the photo is done in good taste.
Click to expand...

Love, lust, sex inside or outside a marriage, should be shared experiences. The obsession that seems to be on display here shows just how little experience that particular poster has actually had. He needs to find a real friend and ditch his right hand.
 
Ice Dancer said:
Yes, I did, because the written rules are clear, but you would never know it based on the subjectivity as expressed by some mods. What I have come to understand is that the rules on here are basically nothing but subjective bullshit; applied to some posters and not others; to this post and that one- but not to others~
Click to expand...

I'd like to see the mods comment on what you've said.

When I first joined this site I turned off signatures when 3D included all the porn in his. Soft porn or models in their underwear, whatever, it has no place in a political discussion board. Since then I've put up with his immaturity by largely ignoring it. His latest pornographic avatar has me considering on putting him on ignore. Its one thing to have a picture pop up every once in a while but the avatars are all over every page of every thread.
 
Ice Dancer said:
I'd prefer not to speculate...but your proclivity for sexually objectifying women speaks for itself. Most men do not have the need to post women in sexually provocative poses nude or half dressed and make sexual comments about them... If it leaves an impression that suggests you must be mastrubating-since it is a primary reason for viewing pornography...well if it walks and talks like a duck...
Click to expand...

Call me naive, but I was actually unaware for a rather long time, that porn served that specific need/purpose. You shouldn't attempt to extrapolate or infer if you are going to come to the wrong conclusions. I personally find willfull ignorance to be quite pathetic. Its one thing to call me out as immature, and tell me that you find my pictures and commentaries to be stupid. In fact, I tend not to get terribly upset when people call me stupid, because I am a big fan of the truth. Question my intelligence, all well and good, make stupid analyses about my sexual habits, and I'm more likely to get annoyed.

Ultimately, what I'm trying to say, is, I find good points in your condemnation of posting such photos, in-and-of themselves, as well as what is then said about them. I'm sympathetic to the feminist argument that pornography is inherently sexist. I post the photos, not to get anyone off, but because it amuses me, and because I admire the beauty of the women in them. Its not neoclassic art, but its pleasant to look at. I may have overstepped by entering the link someone posted and pulling out the image. Damo can delete it if he wants to. That said, I wish you would be honest with me, and not accuse me of things that are obviously not true.
 
King of 32DDD said:
Call me naive, but I was actually unaware for a rather long time, that porn served that specific need/purpose. You shouldn't attempt to extrapolate or infer if you are going to come to the wrong conclusions. I personally find willfull ignorance to be quite pathetic. Its one thing to call me out as immature, and tell me that you find my pictures and commentaries to be stupid. In fact, I tend not to get terribly upset when people call me stupid, because I am a big fan of the truth. Question my intelligence, all well and good, make stupid analyses about my sexual habits, and I'm more likely to get annoyed.

Ultimately, what I'm trying to say, is, I find good points in your condemnation of posting such photos, in-and-of themselves, as well as what is then said about them. I'm sympathetic to the feminist argument that pornography is inherently sexist. I post the photos, not to get anyone off, but because it amuses me, and because I admire the beauty of the women in them. Its not neoclassic art, but its pleasant to look at. I may have overstepped by entering the link someone posted and pulling out the image. Damo can delete it if he wants to. That said, I wish you would be honest with me, and not accuse me of things that are obviously not true.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I mean OMG, what a fucking revelation- porn and mastrubation are intimately connected...blow 3-d over with a feather! The beauty argument is so much BS as to be laughable! How so? Maybe it has something to do with the sexual nature of not just the "beauty" <scoff> shots you post, but the sexual comments that often accompany them! It is immature, irresponsible, and demeaning to women- so knock it off.
 
Lowaicue said:
Love, lust, sex inside or outside a marriage, should be shared experiences. The obsession that seems to be on display here shows just how little experience that particular poster has actually had. He needs to find a real friend and ditch his right hand.
Click to expand...

Even if he is not regularly visiting Mary Palmer and her five sisters, he certainly leaves the impression that he is~
 
Ice Dancer said:
Yeah, I mean OMG, what a fucking revelation- porn and mastrubation are intimately connected...blow 3-d over with a feather! The beauty argument is so much BS as to be laughable! How so? Maybe it has something to do with the sexual nature of not just the "beauty" <scoff> shots you post, but the sexual comments that often accompany them! It is immature, irresponsible, and demeaning to women- so knock it off.
Click to expand...

7327_9ecf_500.jpeg
 
King of 32DDD said:
Wow, I get groaned for telling the truth about myself.

Okay, I own a drug store.
Click to expand...

The way you talk about women and what you'd do to them sexually with your dick kind of makes your claim to naivety lame...so whine over the groan all you want. As you may have noted I am not alone in my impression of how your sexualizing women is seen with regards to mastrubation.
 
OK 3d just for you I removed my groan... Look, I like you, but really, your porn crap is disgusting....it's like enough already. How about you make a thread in whatever goes like Tom and call it 3-d's need to post porn shit or something...then we can all just avoid it if we want.
 
Ice Dancer said:
The way you talk about women and what you'd do to them sexually with your dick kind of makes your claim to naivety lame...so whine over the groan all you want. As you may have noted I am not alone in my impression of how your sexualizing women is seen with regards to mastrubation.
Click to expand...

My God, you are starting to sound like a neocon version of Kathy McKinnon.
 
Ice Dancer said:
OK 3d just for you I removed my groan... Look, I like you, but really, your porn crap is disgusting....it's like enough already. How about you make a thread in whatever goes like Tom and call it 3-d's need to post porn shit or something...then we can all just avoid it if we want.
Click to expand...

what "porn" has 3D posted? your definition of porn? because i have seen no porn posts by 3D.
 
Yurt said:
what "porn" has 3D posted? your definition of porn? because i have seen no porn posts by 3D.
Click to expand...

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...arriage-should-be-illegal&p=791114#post791114

*Is the picture nudity? yes. Is it sexually suggestive nudity? yes. Does the statement made with the post claim "I'd do her doggy style" further suggets it's sexual intent? yes. **Is it also sexually demeaning to women? yes. Your rules are clear...that is until you make excuses and invent caveats.

*12. No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification.

**This forum has been created to encourage a higher level of conversation and debate. This forum inherits all site wide rules, and has some additional caveats:

1) No slurs directed at an individual based on race, ethnicity, sex, or sexual orientation
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top