Alaska nominee says sex outside of marriage should be illegal

Well, that's just great, all the mods are now sexists. Terriffic.

Speaking of tasteless and juvenille, what does EVERY single post you make to Christie, Tom, and Zappas count as? Its often mighty painful to see you reference Christie's stinky tuna, and whatnot. Surely the stuff you and USA say constitute porn...
 
Ice Dancer said:
The fact that all of the mods are men gives you that little space of comfort to continue in your juvenile softcore porn where your sexist appetite for internet hard on's help you feel manly-it still violates rule 12.
Click to expand...

His sexist porn posts has just gotten so fricking repiticious~ and of course there is rule 12~
 
King of 32DDD said:
Well, that's just great, all the mods are now sexists. Terriffic.

Speaking of tasteless and juvenille, what does EVERY single post you make to Christie, Tom, and Zappas count as? Its often mighty painful to see you reference Christie's stinky tuna, and whatnot. Surely the stuff you and USA say constitute porn...
Click to expand...

Every single post I make is not breaking the fucking rule...you want to post porn go to a fucking porn site---and not to point out the obvious, but I have certainly garnered the ugly epithets in my direction and have not fucking whined about it...or repution shit either-when I have broken the rules I have taken the heat... Just stop with your sexist stupid porn shit geeeze
 
Ice Dancer said:
Every single post I make is not breaking the fucking rule...you want to post porn go to a fucking porn site---and not to point out the obvious, but I have certainly garnered the ugly epithets in my direction and have not fucking whined about it...or repution shit either-when I have broken the rules I have taken the heat... Just stop with your sexist stupid porn shit geeeze
Click to expand...

Again, what porn? I could be persuaded that the earlier picture constitutes breach of rules, but you make it sound as though I have a history of breaking the rule.
 
King of 32DDD said:
Again, what porn? I could be persuaded that the earlier picture constitutes breach of rules, but you make it sound as though I have a history of breaking the rule.
Click to expand...

The porn I already pointed out- your history of dick in hand posting of sexullay explicit pictures has always pushed the envelope 3-d you can parse this all you want. I am not the first poster to say something about it and even Grind made a point of it with his NSFV thread.
 
And people can get off to virtually anything, depending on their psyche. Violence, stories, pictures with varying degrees of subtlety, and so forth...
 
King of 32DDD said:
Explicit? ID, do you even know what porn is?
Click to expand...

I am sure I am not as familar as you are...small favors.

I know what you post would not be allowed or tolerated on numerous other blogs because it would be considered porn. You post a sexually suggestive picture of a naked woman and claim you would do her doggy style ...it is not only porn, but sexist and degrading as it promotes women as nothing but sexual objects.
 
Ice Dancer said:
I am sure I am not as familar as you are...small favors.

I know what you post would not be allowed or tolerated on numerous other blogs because it would be considered porn. You post a sexually suggestive picture of a naked woman and claim you would do her doggy style ...it is not only porn, but sexist and degrading as it promotes women as nothing but sexual objects.
Click to expand...

Is it porn if the woman is fully-clothed? Are lingerie models (the overwhelming majority of the women I post photos of) porn stars? Is beach vollyball pornographic?

There is a difference between posting pictures of models (what I do), and soft core porn. For some reason, the members of the generation which discovered sex, consistently fail to understand to more rudimentary points of this stuff...
 
King of 32DDD said:
Is it porn if the woman is fully-clothed? Are lingerie models (the overwhelming majority of the women I post photos of) porn stars? Is beach vollyball pornographic?

There is a difference between posting pictures of models (what I do), and soft core porn. For some reason, the members of the generation which discovered sex, consistently fail to understand to more rudimentary points of this stuff...
Click to expand...

Is the picture nudity? yes. Is it sexually suggestive nudity? yes. Does the statement made with the post claim "I'd do her doggy style" further suggets it's sexual intent? yes. **Is it also sexually demeaning to women? yes. The rules are clear...that is until you make excuses and invent caveats.

*12. No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification.

**This forum has been created to encourage a higher level of conversation and debate. This forum inherits all site wide rules, and has some additional caveats:

1) No slurs directed at an individual based on race, ethnicity, sex, or sexual orientation
 
I do not make slurs in my discourse. Furthermore, I could say, "I would do her doggy style" about any beautiful woman, regardless of how she is dressed.
 
King of 32DDD said:
I do not make slurs in my discourse. Furthermore, I could say, "I would do her doggy style" about any beautiful woman, regardless of how she is dressed.
Click to expand...

Yes, and you do, ad nausea... the fact that you deny the sexist and degrading nature of it proves nothing except your need to defend your misogynistic bent all of which does not counter the clear written words of the rules.

Get over your dick...everyone else has, or at least take it to a porn site where it belongs~
 
LOLZ, okay, I will remember to treat all the women like the dainty butterflies that they are, and not make any sexual references about them.
 
King of 32DDD said:
LOLZ, okay, I will remember to treat all the women like the dainty butterflies that they are, and not make any sexual references about them.
Click to expand...

Right, because what's being asked is for you to treat all women like dainty litlle butterflies...what a disiengenuous fukwit! How about you just stop creating mastrubation moments for yourself by posting women as nothing, but sexual objects, that you can make your doggy fucking comments about on a public political debate forum.
 
King of 32DDD said:
Okay, ID. How many images on this site do you think I've ever masturbated to, while were on the subject of disingenuity?
Click to expand...

I'd prefer not to speculate...but your proclivity for sexually objectifying women speaks for itself. Most men do not have the need to post women in sexually provocative poses nude or half dressed and make sexual comments about them... If it leaves an impression that suggests you must be mastrubating-since it is a primary reason for viewing pornography...well if it walks and talks like a duck...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top