It's about teaching the children... to be good little pinhead protesters!

Yurt said:
this is hilarious, you get to claim you were joking, yet you gave no smilies and zero indication you were joking. but when i say i'm joking, and using a smilie, i'm still a liar.

what a fucking joke you are zappa. chalk up another intellectual dishonest fuck up by you.
Click to expand...

Gee...is that the BOARD NAZI telling another poster how he MUST post in order for his post to be considered H-U-M-O-R?

Weren't you just lecturing another poster about trying to set the rules of discussion?

Another case of Yurt's patented "Do as I say and not as I do..."

So VERY sorry I didn't abide by your idiotic 'smilie" rules...ROFL!!

No joke this time...well...EXCEPT FOR YOU THAT IS.

:good4u:

:lol: :lmao: :rofl:
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Gee...is that the BOARD NAZI telling another poster how he MUST post in order for his post to be considered H-U-M-O-R?

So VERY sorry I didn't abide by your idiotic 'smilie" rules...ROFL!!

No joke this time...well...EXCEPT FOR YOU THAT IS.

:good4u:

:lol: :lmao: :rofl:
Click to expand...

:whoa:

meltdown on aisle 9

i merely pointed out how you are intellectually dishonest by telling others that when they claim they were joking, that they are liars, but you get to claim it as truth. you need a break, shut down your computer before you hurt yourself.
 
Dixie said:
(Originally Posted by apple0154)
Isn't a major part of a teacher's job to teach children about sharing? Empathy? Concern for others?
Click to expand...

Uhm... NO! It's certainly NOT the job of a teacher! Those are things one might learn from their family.... their TRADITIONAL family... or their CHURCH! It's not the Liberals obligation to teach these things, because we don't all agree with what the Liberal views are.
Click to expand...

So the big kid gets the crayon every time? Nobody wants the small kid on their team so the kid doesn't get to participate in team sports?

Obviously you're not cut out to be a teacher. :(
 
ZappasGuitar said:
1...No, I haven't.

2...Prove it.

3...STAND BACK EVERYONE IT'S ANOTHER ONE OF YURT'S HATE-FILLED, PATENTED TEMPER TANTRUMS!

You really are the biggest baby on these boards...ohmygawd...

I'm not going to laugh...
I'm not going to laugh...
I'm not going to laugh...
I'm not going to laugh...

Oh hell...BWWWWWAAAAAAAAAA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!

:good4u:

You are a Douche, but by God you are one FUNNY Douche!
Click to expand...

This is an example of a mature poster.
 
Behold...


Yurt said:
your crazy rant above just proves that what i said is correct. its stupid for you to act like the thread nazi when you routinely go off topic as well. why are you all of a sudden so concerned?
Click to expand...

Do as I say...


Yurt said:
this is hilarious, you get to claim you were joking, yet you gave no smilies and zero indication you were joking...

what a fucking joke you are zappa. chalk up another intellectual dishonest fuck up by you.
Click to expand...

...and NOT as I do!
 
Zap has to make BIG noise to make up for the disappearance of his manhood due to his 200lb weight gain.

He goes home and has to wimper to get a kiss.

Here he feels more impotent!
 
Damn Yankee said:
Actually, my argument is consistently: "if it's not in the Constitution, then it should be left to the states or to the People, unless they amend the Constitution.

Since this thread is about public unions in Wisconsin, I'll stay on the subject of public unions in Wisconsin.

The public unions in Wisconsin were not banned. Employees were given the right to quit the union, and they now have the right to negotiate salaries themselves. The only entity that lost rights are the unions themselves, which are corporations.

I'll ax you again, since when are liberals in favor of corporate rights over employee rights?
Click to expand...

The teachers want to right to have the union negotiate for them. Why are you against that? Where are the teacher's democratic rights?

If the majority of teachers did not want the union who was doing all the protesting?
 
apple0154 said:
The teachers want to right to have the union negotiate for them. Why are you against that? Where are the teacher's democratic rights?

If the majority of teachers did not want the union who was doing all the protesting?
Click to expand...

Judging from the professionally made signs, chartered buses, and electronic megaphones, I'd say most of the protesters were hired by the union bosses.

The union can still negotiate for the teachers, but as individuals.
 
Rana said:
Will it have a life threatening deformity? Will the mother's life be in danger? Was she horrible raped, like the 11 year old in Texas and if she becomes pregnant would you expect her to bring the pregnancy to full term, if she were your eleven year old daughter, would you want her to carry this fetus? Or is this a woman who wants this pregnancy and it is all normal and healthy and so is the mother? It makes a whole lot of difference. Yes, the new sonograms are very moving, I have seen three as of late and it moved me to tears, but that does not take away the fact that this is a very personal issue and one that does not include me.

Will the government please get out of women's uterus and let this be between the woman, her doctor and her god if religion applies. It is noone else's business, with the exception of a father who is in the picture and that is another debate all be itself...:palm:
Click to expand...

It's the same old story with the anti-abortionists. A human life. God's creation. BUT, if it was a rape....well, maybe then we can murder a child and say to hell with God's creation.

A human life. God's creation. BUT, if mommy has a defective body it's OK to scrap God's creation and murder the healthy human being so the defective one may live.

Their logic is so twisted and absurd it's no wonder abortion has been legal for almost 40 years.
 
apple0154 said:
It's the same old story with the anti-abortionists. A human life. God's creation. BUT, if it was a rape....well, maybe then we can murder a child and say to hell with God's creation.

A human life. God's creation. BUT, if mommy has a defective body it's OK to scrap God's creation and murder the healthy human being so the defective one may live.

Their logic is so twisted and absurd it's no wonder abortion has been legal for almost 40 years.
Click to expand...

That's not my logic at all. Again:
Damn Yankee said:
If the woman's life is threatened then the child should be aborted. It's no different than if the child held a gun at the woman; lethal force is justified.
Click to expand...
 
Damn Yankee said:
If the woman's life is threatened then the child should be aborted. It's no different than if the child held a gun at the woman; lethal force is justified.
Click to expand...

Nonsense. Except for tubal pregnancies and, perhaps, a couple of other rare instances the "child" is almost always doing exactly what it's supposed to do. The problems lie with the defective body of the pregnant woman and to try and justify the killing of a child because another human being has a defective body is perverse in the extreme.
 
apple0154 said:
Nonsense. Except for tubal pregnancies and, perhaps, a couple of other rare instances the "child" is almost always doing exactly what it's supposed to do. The problems lie with the defective body of the pregnant woman and to try and justify the killing of a child because another human being has a defective body is perverse in the extreme.
Click to expand...

Being defective isn't justification for murder. If a child held a gun to the head of a retard, lethal force would be justified to save the life of the retard.
 
Damn Yankee said:
Being defective isn't justification for murder. If a child held a gun to the head of a retard, lethal force would be justified to save the life of the retard.
Click to expand...

Apple, why bother, this guy is denser than the Tongass National Forest!

He has never sat by a friend who was told by a doctor that the fetus she was carrying would suffer when it was born with multiple birth defects, one of which was only a partial brain, to make such a stupid and thoughtless comment. You think it was easy for that young woman and her husband to make that decision? It was their first pregnancy. There is a difference between living breathing life and one who is inside the womb, still to young to function on its own.

His calling a handicapped person a retard shows how little compassion and empathy he has for others.

He acts like women run down to the abortion clinic every other month just for shits and giggles.

Stupid idiot!
 
Rana said:
Apple, why bother, this guy is denser than the Tongass National Forest!

He has never sat by a friend who was told by a doctor that the fetus she was carrying would suffer when it was born with multiple birth defects, one of which was only a partial brain, to make such a stupid and thoughtless comment. You think it was easy for that young woman and her husband to make that decision? It was their first pregnancy. There is a difference between living breathing life and one who is inside the womb, still to young to function on its own.

His calling a handicapped person a retard shows how little compassion and empathy he has for others.

He acts like women run down to the abortion clinic every other month just for shits and giggles.

Stupid idiot!
Click to expand...

1. Incredible irony.
2. If the child is defective that doesn't give you the right to murder it.
3. It was an example. :palm:
4. :palm:
5. See item 1.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top