Wisconsin DA files lawsuit challenging union law

It will be a different story here in Ohio. SB#5 hasn't drawn the numbers of protestors or the threat of legal action that the anti-union bill in Wisconsin has because here in Ohio if the public doesn't like a law the legislature creates and the Governor signs into law we can put it up for a vote by public referendum. The odds of SB#5 being able to pass such a public referendum are not good as nearly 60%of the State of Ohio opposes it and only about 30% support it.

I think the best criticism of SB#5 came from a Republican State Senator who said "This is bad legislation and can cost the State a lot of money. This law will turn public workers into beggars who's only recourse will be litigation which will cost the state money it cannot afford to spend. There needs to be a balance between management and labor. Management cannot have it all their way."
 
nigel's vision when it comes to dems:

22blind-man.jpg


he knows i'm right...so of course the only proper response is to ad hom and deflect from his precious dems hypocrisy.
 
nigel's vision when it comes to dems:

22blind-man.jpg


he knows i'm right...so of course the only proper response is to ad hom and deflect from his precious dems hypocrisy.

LOL That was probably the classiest put down I've ever seen on JPP.
 
MADISON, Wis.—A Wisconsin judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking the state's new and contentious collective-bargaining law from taking effect.

Dane County Judge Maryann Sumi issued the order Friday to temporarily block the law as District Attorney Ismael Ozanne, a Democrat, had requested.

Mr. Ozanne filed a lawsuit contending that a legislative committee that broke a stalemate that had kept the law in limbo for weeks met without the 24-hour notice required by Wisconsin's open-meetings law.

The Republican-controlled Legislature passed the measure and Gov. Scott Walker signed it last week.

A spokesman for Republican Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald declined to comment, citing the legal fight. Messages left for comment with Mr. Walker's spokesmen, as well as Democratic legislative leaders, were not immediately returned.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704608504576208551057458290.html
 
bummer...another court denied the injunction....keep forum shopping until you win is the name of the game

then again, obama's h/c law has effectively have injunctions against it as well, but you think it doesn't matter

:rolleyes:
 
bummer...another court denied the injunction....keep forum shopping until you win is the name of the game

Hilarious. The Dane County District Attorney filed suit in a Dane County court and got the injunction. Not sure how much he could have shopped given the limits of his jurisdiction.


then again, obama's h/c law has effectively have injunctions against it as well, but you think it doesn't matter

:rolleyes:

Except, of course, there is no injunction against the Affordable Care Act.
 
Hilarious. The Dane County District Attorney filed suit in a Dane County court and got the injunction. Not sure how much he could have shopped given the limits of his jurisdiction.




Except, of course, there is no injunction against the Affordable Care Act.

yes there is...the ruling is an effective injunction...good freakin lord, you've even argued that it basically is an injunction...funny how you change opinions given which side you're on....

the dems forum shopped by throwing the issue up in multiple counties...
 
yes there is...the ruling is an effective injunction...good freakin lord, you've even argued that it basically is an injunction...funny how you change opinions given which side you're on....

the dems forum shopped by throwing the issue up in multiple counties...


But of course, the ruling has been stayed pending appeal such that there is no injunction, effective or otherwise.
 
Back
Top