Obama Resumes Military Tribunals at Gitmo... liberals silence on campaign LIE!

President Obama announced Monday that military trials will resume for detainees at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp, a move that won praise from Republicans, who say the president has finally "seen the light" on the value of trying such detainees at the facility.

Obama, saying he wants to "broaden our ability to bring terrorists to justice," issued an executive order outlining the changes Monday afternoon, as Defense Secretary Robert Gates rescinded a January 2009 ban against bringing new charges against terror suspects in the military commissions.

"I strongly believe that the American system of justice is a key part of our arsenal in the war against Al Qaeda and its affiliates, and we will continue to draw on all aspects of our justice system -- including Article III courts -- to ensure that our security and our values are strengthened," the president said in a written statement. Article III courts are civilian federal courts.

Rep. Peter King, the Republican chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, praised the move as "clearly another step in the right direction."

“The bottom line is that it affirms the Bush administration policy that our government has the right to detain dangerous terrorists until the cessation of hostilities," King said.

And House Judiciary Commitee Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, said the president is affirming Republicans' belief that terrorists should be treated as enemy combatants rather than criminal defendants.

"Though it took more than two years, I am pleased that the Obama administration has finally seen the light on military commission trials," Smith said.

But the decision sparked immediate criticism from the ACLU.

"The best way to get America out of the Guantanamo morass is to use the most effective and reliable tool we have: our criminal justice system," the organization said in a written statement. "Instead, the Obama administration has done just the opposite and chosen to institutionalize unlawful indefinite detention - creating a troubling 'new normal' -- and to revive the illegitimate Guantanamo military commissions."

The White House said in a written statement that the tribunals are an "important tool in combating international terrorists."

The decision was the latest signal that the prison camp will not close anytime soon, despite the president's pledge when he took office to shutter the facility.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...itary-tribunals-guantanamo-bay/#ixzz1FyVVTUjg
 
Hmmm i read this a couple times and it seems not to mention the fact that congress is refusing to pay for them to come to America and do federal trials so Obama had no choice but to do Tribunals or they would just end up rotting there.
 
Sorry Dixie, Obama's decision is no endorsement of Republicans and their totalitarian methods.

It is a indictment of Congress. He is dealing with the reality that Congress' vehement opposition to trying detainees on U.S. soil leaves them nowhere else to go. The president emphasized his preference for trials in federal civilian courts, and his administration blamed congressional meddling for closing off that avenue.

Obama also said in his statement. "Going forward, all branches of government have a responsibility to come together to forge a strong and durable approach to defend our nation and the values that define who we are as a nation."

It's time to end this dark and ugly chapter in our history and try to heal the black eye this gives America. What is so ironic Dixie, Guantanamo is right out of Stalin's playbook. But when Republicans do it, it is not evil, it is righteous.
 
Well, Congress votes bases on what their constituents want... it's called Representative Democracy... Perhaps Obama should have considered that before he made the promise?
 
Hmmm i read this a couple times and it seems not to mention the fact that congress is refusing to pay for them to come to America and do federal trials so Obama had no choice but to do Tribunals or they would just end up rotting there.

Ummm Obama's party had control of congress until this past January...he punted on this because once he got in he realized that Gitmo was the best solution to a sticky issue. The point is no one who railed against/about Gitmo is demanding he keep his so called principled promise.
 
Hmmm i read this a couple times and it seems not to mention the fact that congress is refusing to pay for them to come to America and do federal trials so Obama had no choice but to do Tribunals or they would just end up rotting there.

What do you expect it's not called Faux News for nothing.
 
Ummm Obama's party had control of congress until this past January...he punted on this because once he got in he realized that Gitmo was the best solution to a sticky issue. The point is no one who railed against/about Gitmo is demanding he keep his so called principled promise.

You know what Ice Dancer, I don't give a shit about Obama and his party or Republicans and their Gestapo party.

Believe it or not, there was a time I supported George W. Bush. I was for going into Afghanistan to find bin Laden after 9/11. But as soon as Iraq became his focus, I was vehemently against it. Bush's action metastasized my opposition to him. It wasn't a partisan decision.

Here is an example of how that man's priorities cost human beings their lives...innocent human beings. It shouldn't matter if they are American, innocent is innocent, and human life is human life.

April 9, 2010
George W. Bush 'knew Guantánamo prisoners were innocent'

George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld covered up that hundreds of innocent men were sent to the Guantánamo Bay prison camp because they feared that releasing them would harm the push for war in Iraq and the broader War on Terror, according to a new document obtained by The Times.

The accusations were made by Lawrence Wilkerson, a top aide to Colin Powell, the former Republican Secretary of State, in a signed declaration to support a lawsuit filed by a Guantánamo detainee. It is the first time that such allegations have been made by a senior member of the Bush Administration.

Colonel Wilkerson, who was General Powell’s chief of staff when he ran the State Department, was most critical of Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld. He claimed that the former Vice-President and Defence Secretary knew that the majority of the initial 742 detainees sent to Guantánamo in 2002 were innocent but believed that it was “politically impossible to release them”.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7092435.ece
 
They had to get the "intell" they needed to attack Iraq.

If an innocent had to be tortured until they would say whatever the Bush admin wanted said then that was OK with them.
 
Well, Congress votes bases on what their constituents want... it's called Representative Democracy... Perhaps Obama should have considered that before he made the promise?

Are you a fucking child? When was the last time a congressman actualy voted to suit his constituents?
 
It is something he should have never had to deal with. But a president is not a dictator, which is a concept you don't understand.

Huh? So.... your excuse for Obama perpetrating evil, is because he couldn't stop it, because it was already happening before he became president???

I am very confused by that.
 
Are you a fucking child? When was the last time a congressman actualy voted to suit his constituents?

Probably the last time a Congressman cast a vote, if he wasn't a Democrat. You see, most politicians want to please their constituents, it's how they get reelected.... but you're right, the Democrats have recently been having a problem with that.
 
Huh? So.... your excuse for Obama perpetrating evil, is because he couldn't stop it, because it was already happening before he became president???

I am very confused by that.

You are very confused about a lot of things...LOL
 
You are very confused about a lot of things...LOL

Yeah, well... I kind of thought that was one of the reasons you voted for Obama, so he would change policies like this... but now you tell me, he can't do anything except continue those policies and keep those "innocent" terrorists locked up at Gitmo, because it was already being done under Bush. Sorry that confuses me, I am trying to find the logic... why did you vote for Obama again?
 
Yeah, well... I kind of thought that was one of the reasons you voted for Obama, so he would change policies like this... but now you tell me, he can't do anything except continue those policies and keep those "innocent" terrorists locked up at Gitmo, because it was already being done under Bush. Sorry that confuses me, I am trying to find the logic... why did you vote for Obama again?

The best way to resolve Bush's fiasco is to have the people being incarcerated at Gitmo stand trial. The President wanted them to stand trial in the United States using our criminal justice system that has worked for centuries, and we have successfully held trials in the past for people charged with terrorism. Even though this will reignite arguments over the legality of the military commissions, it is the proper thing to do.
 
Hmmm i read this a couple times and it seems not to mention the fact that congress is refusing to pay for them to come to America and do federal trials so Obama had no choice but to do Tribunals or they would just end up rotting there.

With all the coin the president has at his disposal he can't find a few million measly dollars to do this on another budget item?
 
The best way to resolve Bush's fiasco is to have the people being incarcerated at Gitmo stand trial. The President wanted them to stand trial in the United States using our criminal justice system that has worked for centuries, and we have successfully held trials in the past for people charged with terrorism. Even though this will reignite arguments over the legality of the military commissions, it is the proper thing to do.

But that's not what the Obama Administration is doing. They just announced the resumption of those awful and un-American military tribunals! They are going to continue to hold detainees at Gitmo, and give them military tribunals, just like Bush was doing.

So.... Why did you vote for Obama again???
 
But that's not what the Obama Administration is doing. They just announced the resumption of those awful and un-American military tribunals! They are going to continue to hold detainees at Gitmo, and give them military tribunals, just like Bush was doing.

So.... Why did you vote for Obama again???

And lest the libtards forget...increased renditions under president Oblamea`
 
Probably the last time a Congressman cast a vote, if he wasn't a Democrat. You see, most politicians want to please their constituents, it's how they get reelected.... but you're right, the Democrats have recently been having a problem with that.

Both parties are bought fool.
 
Back
Top