Fox News not allowed in Canada!

So you agree that telling half truths and outright lies in order to advance their oligarchic agenda is ok? Very American of you.
Again, the majority of Americans believe that the other news networks are the liars. What aren't you upset about them?
 
Before FNC, libtards had a monopoly on TV news. Now they have lost the ratings war and have been exposed so they are upset.

true...but that doesn't mean its ok for fox to falsely slant their news...i expect a slant, but at least honest reporting

and it is hilarious to watch dems meltdown over fox news. i actually never watched fox news until the dems kept bitching about it, so i thought....hmmm, i wonder why that is. so now i occasionally watch fox and use their website....all thanks to dems. true story :)
 
true...but that doesn't mean its ok for fox to falsely slant their news...i expect a slant, but at least honest reporting

and it is hilarious to watch dems meltdown over fox news. i actually never watched fox news until the dems kept bitching about it, so i thought....hmmm, i wonder why that is. so now i occasionally watch fox and use their website....all thanks to dems. true story :)


Whenever I have reviewed a libtard's complaint it's either been silly or focused on a commenter. They don't seem to understand the difference between news and commentary.
 
Whenever I have reviewed a libtard's complaint it's either been silly or focused on a commenter. They don't seem to understand the difference between news and commentary.

Kind of like when those on the right talk about Olbermann, Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow, etc?
 
Walter Cronkite rolls over in his grave along with Orwell.

The problem is Faux is not news, its corporate opinion disguised as news.
Actually it's sensationalism.

sensationalism |senˈsā sh ənlˌizəm|
noun
1 (esp. in journalism) the use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement : media sensationalism.

example:

"the Fox Nation website immediately claimed that Tobin had been "assaulted by demonstrator during live shot."
 
Walter Cronkite rolls over in his grave along with Orwell.

The problem is Faux is not news, its corporate opinion disguised as news.
Actually it's sensationalism.

sensationalism |senˈsā sh ənlˌizəm|
noun
1 (esp. in journalism) the use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement : media sensationalism.

example:

"the Fox Nation website immediately claimed that Tobin had been "assaulted by demonstrator during live shot."

Walter was a liberal. Have you read is autobiography?
 
The extremes you wingnuts will go to to defend your right to be conditioned is amazing. You can't tell lies from truth anymore and anything that is against your corporate brainwashing is of the devil, socialism or communism. I actually feel sorry for you lemmings.

The harder things get for working people in this country the more they will realize that Faux news has a corporate, corrupt, 1 party agenda that is against workers own best interest. People in Wis. already have voter remorse. The chant 'Fox News Lies' has only just begun.
 
They spend 75% of their time disproving lies from faux. Most of the lies are so outrageous and anti-American that they are easy to disprove with facts and reality.
Wow with all that free advertising, no wonder FNC's ratings are huge...
 
The extremes you wingnuts will go to to defend your right to be conditioned is amazing. You can't tell lies from truth anymore and anything that is against your corporate brainwashing is of the devil, socialism or communism. I actually feel sorry for you lemmings.

The harder things get for working people in this country the more they will realize that Faux news has a corporate, corrupt, 1 party agenda that is against workers own best interest. People in Wis. already have voter remorse. The chant 'Fox News Lies' has only just begun.

is your claim that only fox news submitted briefs in support of fox's first amendment argument? is it your claim that only fox news slants their coverage? because all you do is whine about fox news, i never see you say boo about any other news. you certaintly don't spend so much of your time finding little things to attack them with.
 
Walter Cronkite rolls over in his grave along with Orwell.

The problem is Faux is not news, its corporate opinion disguised as news.
Actually it's sensationalism.

sensationalism |senˈsā sh ənlˌizəm|
noun
1 (esp. in journalism) the use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement : media sensationalism.

example:

"the Fox Nation website immediately claimed that Tobin had been "assaulted by demonstrator during live shot."

and ted turner's network cnn is not?

LOL

fox fox fox fox

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
 
is your claim that only fox news submitted briefs in support of fox's first amendment argument? is it your claim that only fox news slants their coverage? because all you do is whine about fox news, i never see you say boo about any other news. you certaintly don't spend so much of your time finding little things to attack them with.

My only claim is that faux 'news' lies and is the propaganda arm of the corporate fascist right. I can back that up with hundreds of examples. Submitted briefs? get real. Oops sorry you dont know what real is.

Read this.
1984
G. Orwell
 
The story says nothing of the sort.

2004, CRTC approved Fox News Broadcast in Canada. The only cable company in Canada that doesn't offer it is Videotron..

Ah, I always forget about the concrete thought process of the conservative mind. No room for interpretation, imagination, sarcasm or irony.
 
My only claim is that faux 'news' lies and is the propaganda arm of the corporate fascist right. I can back that up with hundreds of examples. Submitted briefs? get real. Oops sorry you dont know what real is.

Read this.
1984
G. Orwell

do you what an amicus curiae brief is? numerous other media outlets submitted them in support of fox's position on the first amendment. that is an absolute fact. so obviously, you do not live in reality.

when you call out the other stations, then you might have some credibility. until then you're just a toe licker fox whiner....and really, to claim fox news is what 1984 is about is pure ignorance
 
Back
Top