Another Obama Pal Tax Cheater

RockX

Banned
The Rev. Al Sharpton, who has vowed to clean up his fiscal house, has a new tax lien to pay.

Sharpton owes $359,973 to the IRS for 2009 personal income tax, according to documents on file with the city.

Public records show he owes a total of $3.7 million in city, state and federal taxes, including penalties, dating to 2002. But Sharpton's spokeswoman, Rachel Noerdlinger, said that he had paid back "well over seven figures" as part of agreements with the state and IRS and that the liens remained on the books as "a matter of bureaucracy."

Sharpton made $250,000 as head of the nonprofit National Action Network in 2009, a year that ended with the group owing $1.1 million in taxes and having just $36,397 cash on hand.

The organization also pays for first-class or charter travel for Sharpton and other NAN staff, according to its 2009 tax return. Noerdlinger declined to say for whom.

View attachment 587

Must be nice to have friends in high places, guess protesting and blackmailing is not paying what it used to...
 
I didn't know Obama was a 'pal' of Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas.

Clarence Thomas failed to report wife's income, watchdog says

Virginia Thomas earned over $680,000 from conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation over five years, a group says. But Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas did not include it on financial disclosure forms.

58973486.jpg


Reporting from Washington —
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas failed to report his wife's income from a conservative think tank on financial disclosure forms for at least five years, the watchdog group Common Cause said Friday.

Between 2003 and 2007, Virginia Thomas, a longtime conservative activist, earned $686,589 from the Heritage Foundation, according to a Common Cause review of the foundation's IRS records. Thomas failed to note the income in his Supreme Court financial disclosure forms for those years, instead checking a box labeled "none" where "spousal non-investment income" would be disclosed.

More
 
i guess bfgrn supports sharpton's tax evasion, no surprise, some dems are all for raising taxes, so long as they aren't the ones paying the taxes

and watch, onceler will not run in and give his usual boring one liner "they did it too!!!!!!!"
 
i guess bfgrn supports sharpton's tax evasion, no surprise, some dems are all for raising taxes, so long as they aren't the ones paying the taxes

and watch, onceler will not run in and give his usual boring one liner "they did it too!!!!!!!"

The OP says Sharpton 'had paid back "well over seven figures" as part of agreements with the state and IRS and that the liens remained on the books as "a matter of bureaucracy."'

Clarence Thomas and his wife didn't even REPORT her $686,589 income.
 
The OP says Sharpton 'had paid back "well over seven figures" as part of agreements with the state and IRS and that the liens remained on the books as "a matter of bureaucracy."'

Clarence Thomas and his wife didn't even REPORT her $686,589 income.

like i said, you support his earlier tax evasion and have to resort to thomas's actions as justification for sharpton....

we get it, pubs = bad, dems = good

and the reporting of income was not related to taxes and its comical you would try to correlate the two, so once again, in order to deflect from dems short comings you look like a hack
 
like i said, you support his earlier tax evasion and have to resort to thomas's actions as justification for sharpton....

we get it, pubs = bad, dems = good

and the reporting of income was not related to taxes and its comical you would try to correlate the two, so once again, in order to deflect from dems short comings you look like a hack

Ther is no bigger partisan hack than you Yurt. If Sharpton owes taxes, he should pay them.

HOW is failing to report income NOT related to taxes you moron? If you don't report income, there is NO TAX...that is evading paying taxes you pea brain.
 
Ther is no bigger partisan hack than you Yurt. If Sharpton owes taxes, he should pay them.

HOW is failing to report income NOT related to taxes you moron? If you don't report income, there is NO TAX...that is evading paying taxes you pea brain.

lol, you calling someone a hack, thats funny, really

you didn't come into this thread saying sharp ton should pay taxes, no, you immediately brought up an unrelated situation with a conservative leaning justice

if you actually read the Thomas story, instead of orgasming that you got a gotcha moment, it has nothing to do with taxes you ignorant twit, it has to do with judicial disclosure, nothing at all related to taxes....thanks again for proving you have sub par intelligence :)
 
lol, you calling someone a hack, thats funny, really

you didn't come into this thread saying sharp ton should pay taxes, no, you immediately brought up an unrelated situation with a conservative leaning justice

if you actually read the Thomas story, instead of orgasming that you got a gotcha moment, it has nothing to do with taxes you ignorant twit, it has to do with judicial disclosure, nothing at all related to taxes....thanks again for proving you have sub par intelligence :)

I said Sharpton should pay any taxes he owes. But the magnitude and effect of one preacher owing taxes vs. unethical and deceptive behavior of a Supreme Court justice, a man who sits on the highest court of the land, is called upon daily to understand and interpret the most complicated legal issues of our day and makes decisions that affect millions is not even close.

Thomas failed for 13 years to properly disclose his wife's income on federal financial forms. WHY? Because she is heavily involved in far right wing politics and it creates a conflict of interest.

Thomas and the rest of the far right wing scum that wear robes should be removed and disbarred.
 
I said Sharpton should pay any taxes he owes. But the magnitude and effect of one preacher owing taxes vs. unethical and deceptive behavior of a Supreme Court justice, a man who sits on the highest court of the land, is called upon daily to understand and interpret the most complicated legal issues of our day and makes decisions that affect millions is not even close.

Thomas failed for 13 years to properly disclose his wife's income on federal financial forms. WHY? Because she is heavily involved in far right wing politics and it creates a conflict of interest.

Thomas and the rest of the far right wing scum that wear robes should be removed and disbarred.

he can't be disbarred for that. there was already a thread on thomas, i said what he did is wrong. so did other conservatives as well. so i fail to see why thomas is relevant in a thread about sharpton cheating on his taxes. but one thing is relevant, liberals of course defend or minimize their fellow libs and try to deflect by bringing a completely unrelated event about a conservative....you're a hack

your first post had zero to do with sharpton. you immediately brougtht up a completely unrelated story about a conservative to MINIMIZE sharpton's actions....then you fucked up by trying to claim thomas's actions involved tax, it didn't, but you had to defend your liberal crowd

you're such a political hack that you believe all conservative justices should be disbarred...only a far left extreme nutcase would make such a sweeping statement
 
he can't be disbarred for that. there was already a thread on thomas, i said what he did is wrong. so did other conservatives as well. so i fail to see why thomas is relevant in a thread about sharpton cheating on his taxes. but one thing is relevant, liberals of course defend or minimize their fellow libs and try to deflect by bringing a completely unrelated event about a conservative....you're a hack

your first post had zero to do with sharpton. you immediately brougtht up a completely unrelated story about a conservative to MINIMIZE sharpton's actions....then you fucked up by trying to claim thomas's actions involved tax, it didn't, but you had to defend your liberal crowd

you're such a political hack that you believe all conservative justices should be disbarred...only a far left extreme nutcase would make such a sweeping statement

Hey asshole, please show me where I defend Sharpton? If you're worried about lost revenues, then let's talk about something important like all the tax loopholes that allow millionaires and huge corporations to pay no taxes at all.

You are just an anal retentive hack who is a fucking control freak. You want to dictate what people can post and even who can or can't post.

I'm sure you really miss the rep system where you could seek revenge and try to inflict what you felt was a form of punishment. You are one sick fuck. See a psychiatrist.
 
Hey asshole, please show me where I defend Sharpton? If you're worried about lost revenues, then let's talk about something important like all the tax loopholes that allow millionaires and huge corporations to pay no taxes at all.

You are just an anal retentive hack who is a fucking control freak. You want to dictate what people can post and even who can or can't post.

I'm sure you really miss the rep system where you could seek revenge and try to inflict what you felt was a form of punishment. You are one sick fuck. See a psychiatrist.

actually, i was a proponent of getting rid of the rep system...

you defended sharpton by deflecting onto a dem. you're the control freak, must not say anything bad about your beloved dems without pointing that pubs are actually more evil, so the dems = good, pubs= bad

hack
 
actually, i was a proponent of getting rid of the rep system...

you defended sharpton by deflecting onto a dem. you're the control freak, must not say anything bad about your beloved dems without pointing that pubs are actually more evil, so the dems = good, pubs= bad

hack

Sorry Yurt, 'I know you are but what am I' is not an argument. It's a tantrum. On every thread you try to control what people can say. If that is not being a control freak, then what is?
 
The OP says Sharpton 'had paid back "well over seven figures" as part of agreements with the state and IRS and that the liens remained on the books as "a matter of bureaucracy."'

Clarence Thomas and his wife didn't even REPORT her $686,589 income.

Didn't disclose it ...
That has fuckin' noting to do with paying or cheating on income taxes, you pinheaded fool.....:palm:

What an asshole tool you are....
 
Sorry Yurt, 'I know you are but what am I' is not an argument. It's a tantrum. On every thread you try to control what people can say. If that is not being a control freak, then what is?

you are a deranged. i'll take the above as capitulation that you screwed up this thread. :)
 
Back
Top