Dems - fight for nothing, stand for nothing

signalmankenneth

Verified User
by Chris Hedges

Barack Obama is another stock character in the cyclical political theater embraced by the liberal class. Act I is the burst of enthusiasm for a Democratic candidate who, through clever branding and public relations, appears finally to stand up for the interests of citizens rather than corporations. Act II is the flurry of euphoria and excitement. Act III begins with befuddled confusion and gnawing disappointment, humiliating appeals to the elected official to correct “mistakes,” and pleading with the officeholder to return to his or her true self. Act IV is the thunder and lightning scene. Liberals strut across the stage in faux moral outrage, delivering empty threats of vengeance. And then there is Act V. This act is the most pathetic. It is as much farce as tragedy. Liberals—frightened back into submission by the lunatic fringe of the Republican Party or the call to be practical—begin the drama all over again.

We are now in Act IV, the one where the liberal class postures like the cowardly policemen in “The Pirates of Penzance.” Liberals promise battle. They talk of glory and honor. They vow not to abandon their core liberal values. They rouse themselves, like the terrified policemen who have no intention of fighting the pirates, with the bugle call of “Tarantara!” This scene is the most painful to watch. It is a window into how hollow, vacuous and powerless liberals and liberal institutions including labor, the liberal church, the press, the arts, universities and the Democratic Party have become. They fight for nothing.

They stand for nothing. And at a moment when we desperately need citizens and institutions willing to stand up against corporate forces for the core liberal values, values that make a democracy possible, we get the ridiculous chatter and noise of the liberal class.

The moral outrage of the liberal class, a specialty of MSNBC, groups such as Progressives for Obama and MoveOn.org, is built around the absurd language of personal narrative—as if Barack Obama ever wanted to or could defy the interests of Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase or General Electric. The liberal class refuses to directly confront the dead hand of corporate power that is rapidly transforming America into a brutal feudal state. To name this power, to admit that it has a death grip on our political process, our systems of information, our artistic and religious expression, our education, and has successfully emasculated popular movements, including labor, is to admit that the only weapons we have left are acts of civil disobedience. And civil disobedience is difficult, uncomfortable and lonely. It requires us to step outside the formal systems of power and trust in acts that are marginal, often unrecognized and have no hope of immediate success.

The liberal class’ solution to the bleak political landscape is the conference. This, along with letters and cries of outrage circulated on the Internet, is its preferred form of expression. Conferences, whether organized by Left Forum, Rabbi Michael Lerner’s Tikkun or figures such as Ted Glick—who is touting a plan to lure progressives, including members of the Democratic Party, into something he calls a “third force”—are where liberals go to feel good about themselves again. These conferences are not fundamentally about change. They are designed to elevate self-appointed liberal apologists who seek to become advisers and courtiers within the Democratic Party. The conferences produce resolutions no one reads. They build networks no one uses. But with each conference liberals get to do what they do best—applaud their own moral probity. They make passionate appeals to work within systems, such as electoral politics, that have been gamed by the corporate state. And the result is to spur well-meaning people toward useless and ultimately self-defeating activity.

“What we need is an alliance which consciously incorporates elected Democrats as well as elected Greens and independents, as well as groups, or individual leaders and members of groups, like Progressive Democrats of America and the Green Party,” Glick proposes. “More than that, this alliance eventually needs to support and work to elect candidates running both as Democrats and progressive independents, and maybe even an occasional Republican.”

The Tikkun Conference held in Washington last June was another pathetic display of liberal apologists begging Obama to be Obama. The organizers called on those participating to “Support Obama to BE the Obama We Voted For—Not the Inside-the-Beltway Pragmatist/Realist whose compromises have led to a decrease in his popularity and opened the door for a revival of the just-recently-discredited Right wing.”

Good luck.

The organizers of the Left Forum conference scheduled for this March at Pace University in New York City also communicate in the amorphous, high-blown moral rhetoric that is unmoored from the actual and real. The upcoming Left Forum conference, which has the vacuous title “Towards a Politics of Solidarity,” promises to “focus on the age-old theme of solidarity: the moral act of imagination underpinning working-class victories everywhere. It will undertake to examine the new forms of far-reaching solidarity that are both necessary and possible in an increasingly global world.” The organizers posit that “the potential for transformative struggles in the 21st century depends on new chains of solidarity—between workers in the rich world and workers in the global south, indigenous peasants and more affluent consumers, students and pensioners, villagers in the Niger Delta and environmental campaigners in the Gulf of Mexico, marchers and rioters in Greece and Spain, and unionists in the United States and China.” The conference “will contribute to the intellectual underpinnings of new and tighter forms of world-wide solidarity upon which all successful emancipatory struggles of the future will depend.”

The conference agenda, which sounds like a parody of a course catalogue description, includes the requisite academic jargon of “moral act of imagination” and “chains of solidarity.” This language gives to the enterprise a lofty but undefined purpose. And this is a specialty of the liberal class—to grandly say nothing. The last thing the liberal class intends to do is fight back. Left Forum brings in a few titans, including Noam Chomsky, who is always worth hearing, but it contributes as well to the lethargy and turpitude that have made the liberal class impotent.

The only gatherings worth attending from now on are acts that organize civil disobedience, which is why I will be at Lafayette Park in Washington, D.C., at noon March 19 to protest the eighth anniversary of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. Veterans groups on March 19 will also carry out street protests in San Francisco, Los Angeles and Chicago. You can link to the protests at AnswerCoalition.org. Save your bus fare and your energy for events like this one.

Either we begin to militantly stand against the coal, oil and natural gas industry or we do not. Either we defy pre-emptive war and occupation or we do not. Either we demand that the criminal class on Wall Street be held accountable for the theft of billions of dollars from small shareholders whose savings for retirement or college were wiped out or we do not. Either we defend basic civil liberties, including habeas corpus and the prosecution of torturers or we do not. Either we turn on liberal institutions, including the Democratic Party, which collaborate with these corporations or we do not. Either we accept that the age of political compromise is dead, that the corporate systems of power are instruments of death that can be fought only by physical acts of resistance or we do not. If the liberal class remains gullible and weak, if it continues to speak to itself and others in meaningless platitudes, it will remain as responsible for our enslavement as those it pompously denounces.
 
I love Chris Hedges. He tells it like it is.

America desperately needed another Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Harry Truman or John F. Kennedy, instead we got another Herbert Hoover.

"Harry Truman once said, 'There are 14 or 15 million Americans who have the resources to have representatives in Washington to protect their interests, and that the interests of the great mass of the other people - the 150 or 160 million - is the responsibility of the president of the United States, and I propose to fulfill it.'"
President John F. Kennedy
 
Well, JFK was the last Democrat to have a functioning brain....nothing like todays pinheads that masquerade as Democrats...
John would have disowned an asshole/commie like Teddy the drunk.
 
Isn'tt it funny how "will of the people" goes out the liberal window when the people will something they do not like. For 8 years, the democrats SCREAMED about "will of the people!" Bush was ignoring the will of the people. So, we got Obama in, along with a whole bunch of democrats, who took us in direction that many - including many who voted for Obama - did not like. So last election the "will of the people" spoke rather loudly, eliminating a rather large democratic majority in the house, and vastly diminishing the democratic majority in the Senate.

ONE democrat seems to have taken a message from the last elections: Obama. And in turn, Obama has changed HIS direction, seemingly to reflect the will of the people as indicated by the elections. So what do the "will of the people" liberal democrats do? They vilify Obama for changing direction.

LOL Just shows what liberals REALLY believe: think their way, or be demonized. Will of the people be damned, unless that "will" is lock-step with their big mommy government program.
 
Isn'tt it funny how "will of the people" goes out the liberal window when the people will something they do not like. For 8 years, the democrats SCREAMED about "will of the people!" Bush was ignoring the will of the people. So, we got Obama in, along with a whole bunch of democrats, who took us in direction that many - including many who voted for Obama - did not like. So last election the "will of the people" spoke rather loudly, eliminating a rather large democratic majority in the house, and vastly diminishing the democratic majority in the Senate.

ONE democrat seems to have taken a message from the last elections: Obama. And in turn, Obama has changed HIS direction, seemingly to reflect the will of the people as indicated by the elections. So what do the "will of the people" liberal democrats do? They vilify Obama for changing direction.

LOL Just shows what liberals REALLY believe: think their way, or be demonized. Will of the people be damned, unless that "will" is lock-step with their big mommy government program.

And what did Republicans do when the will of the people was clear? They mounted a propaganda campaign filled with lies, fearmongering and used words like 'insurgency' to distort the debate and refused to participate in governance.

The problem is you folks on the right are dumber than a pile of dogshit. You are pawns that don't have the cognitive ability to even know how we got here. The GOP, teabaggers and their followers have become the party of know-nothingism
 
And both sides ignored the "will of the people" numerous times. The laws that make smoking illegal in privately owned restaurants and bars was wanted by who?? The IRS and the tax system we have is wanted by who?? And when did the "will of the people" ask for the smothering debt we now have? But the "will of the people" has certainly been for a more secure border.

And which party has balanced the budget? Oh yeah, neither one.

Which party thought a privately owned restaurant should decide whether it allows smoking or not? Oh yeah, neither one.

Which party has offered serious, across-the-board tax reforms? Oh yeah, neither one.

Which party has actually slowed the number of illegal immigrants flooding this country?? Oh yeah, neither one.




So as long as ya'll take every opportunity to blame the other party for all the ills, and ignore the wholesale lies that virtually every major politician has told and sold, we won't ever fix the problems.

Every time I see SM blame "libtards" or you two blame "neocons" for everything, as if one side is evil and the other a saint, it makes me want to vomit.

Everytime I see these major issues trivialized into some vague black and white nonsense, just so you can point fingers and call the other side names, I see more of the Tucson shootings in our future. And I see both parties allowing more of the same. Because their own constituents only vaguely know what they actually want. And mostly that is just for the "other side" to lose.
 
And both sides ignored the "will of the people" numerous times. The laws that make smoking illegal in privately owned restaurants and bars was wanted by who?? The IRS and the tax system we have is wanted by who?? And when did the "will of the people" ask for the smothering debt we now have? But the "will of the people" has certainly been for a more secure border.

And which party has balanced the budget? Oh yeah, neither one.

Which party thought a privately owned restaurant should decide whether it allows smoking or not? Oh yeah, neither one.

Which party has offered serious, across-the-board tax reforms? Oh yeah, neither one.

Which party has actually slowed the number of illegal immigrants flooding this country?? Oh yeah, neither one.




So as long as ya'll take every opportunity to blame the other party for all the ills, and ignore the wholesale lies that virtually every major politician has told and sold, we won't ever fix the problems.

Every time I see SM blame "libtards" or you two blame "neocons" for everything, as if one side is evil and the other a saint, it makes me want to vomit.

Everytime I see these major issues trivialized into some vague black and white nonsense, just so you can point fingers and call the other side names, I see more of the Tucson shootings in our future. And I see both parties allowing more of the same. Because their own constituents only vaguely know what they actually want. And mostly that is just for the "other side" to lose.

Nice rant...

In America the young are always ready to give to those who are older than themselves the full benefits of their inexperience.
Oscar Wilde
 
What? And you are how old?

Old enough to remember Harry Truman and old enough to know that the society the liberal era built from the New Deal through the Great Society is the antithesis of the authoritarian police state the conservative era created.
 
Old enough to remember Harry Truman and old enough to know that the society the liberal era built from the New Deal through the Great Society is the antithesis of the authoritarian police state the conservative era created.

Then you ought to be old enough to know it is folly to assume someone is young and inexperienced simply because you do not like the message they send. I am neither young nor inexperienced.

I did not single out any group, or call any single group names, as you did. I called the entire fiasco a mess. And it most certainly is that.

Both the democrats and republicans own a share of the mess we are in. If you want to waste time saying one is a little less guilty, that is up to you. But it accomplishes absolutely nothing except to create more animosity.
 
Old enough to remember Harry Truman and old enough to know that the society the liberal era built from the New Deal through the Great Society is the antithesis of the authoritarian police state the conservative era created.

if you're old enough to remember Truman you're supposed to have died already to make room for those of us born in the 50s......
 
Then you ought to be old enough to know it is folly to assume someone is young and inexperienced simply because you do not like the message they send. I am neither young nor inexperienced.

I did not single out any group, or call any single group names, as you did. I called the entire fiasco a mess. And it most certainly is that.

Both the democrats and republicans own a share of the mess we are in. If you want to waste time saying one is a little less guilty, that is up to you. But it accomplishes absolutely nothing except to create more animosity.

I don't care about animosity from people who are too stupid to be allowed to cross the street unsupervised.

There are no absolutes...both parties have contributed, but it is not an equal share. And the most important issue is who can get use out of this fiasco. The party of know-nothingism doesn't even know how we got here...
 
I don't care about animosity from people who are too stupid to be allowed to cross the street unsupervised.

There are no absolutes...both parties have contributed, but it is not an equal share. And the most important issue is who can get use out of this fiasco. The party of know-nothingism doesn't even know how we got here...

Oh please. The party you claim can get us out is responsible for removing regulations that got us here. They are responsible for pushing financial institutions (even requiring them) to do things that were against their better interests and ultimately against us all. They are also responsible for a huge amount of this debt.



If you want to believe that only the dems can save us, and that they didn't help us get where we are, that is your business. But delusions won't help us.


And the entire point of my rants is not that there are no solutions. It is that the animosity created by that sort of bullshit partisan political nonsense is counterproductive.

You aren't as interested in solutions as you are in pointing fingers and placing blame.

We all need to stop tolerating being lied to by our elected leaders. If they promise something, and don't deliver, they should never be elected again. If they accept money from corporations, PACs, or other politically partisan groups, or if they have a hint of scandal around them they should lose the election.
 
We all need to stop tolerating being lied to by our elected leaders. If they promise something, and don't deliver, they should never be elected again. If they accept money from corporations, PACs, or other politically partisan groups, or if they have a hint of scandal around them they should lose the election.
While I did not, shall we say, "appreciate" the majority of candidates brought out and supported by the TEA party movement, I have to say the whole thing DID give me a glimmer of hope for the future of American politics. For the first time since I entered into active politics, we saw the people tell the national party committees (well one of them anyway) that their S.O.S. candidates are not good enough for us. Now, if BOTH sides would do something about telling the DNC and RNC their typical bullshit is no longer acceptable to the voters, we just may have a real chance of taking this nation back.
 
Oh please. The party you claim can get us out is responsible for removing regulations that got us here. They are responsible for pushing financial institutions (even requiring them) to do things that were against their better interests and ultimately against us all. They are also responsible for a huge amount of this debt.

Explain...
 
And both sides ignored the "will of the people" numerous times. The laws that make smoking illegal in privately owned restaurants and bars was wanted by who?? The IRS and the tax system we have is wanted by who?? And when did the "will of the people" ask for the smothering debt we now have? But the "will of the people" has certainly been for a more secure border.

And which party has balanced the budget? Oh yeah, neither one.

Which party thought a privately owned restaurant should decide whether it allows smoking or not? Oh yeah, neither one.

Which party has offered serious, across-the-board tax reforms? Oh yeah, neither one.

Which party has actually slowed the number of illegal immigrants flooding this country?? Oh yeah, neither one.




So as long as ya'll take every opportunity to blame the other party for all the ills, and ignore the wholesale lies that virtually every major politician has told and sold, we won't ever fix the problems.

Every time I see SM blame "libtards" or you two blame "neocons" for everything, as if one side is evil and the other a saint, it makes me want to vomit.

Everytime I see these major issues trivialized into some vague black and white nonsense, just so you can point fingers and call the other side names, I see more of the Tucson shootings in our future. And I see both parties allowing more of the same. Because their own constituents only vaguely know what they actually want. And mostly that is just for the "other side" to lose.

you forget that clinton balanced the budget and then bush proceeded to start two unfunded wars, he also passed unfunded tax cuts and unfunded medicare prescription benefits
 
Back
Top