Clarence Thomas ethics violation?

Well, that was a very enlightening post. Thanks for the info.

Of course, what's truly humerous is you thinking any judge or rep is reading this.

i'm sure they don't have to, but this very same thing is probably happening all across the political spectrum and is being noticed......that the left and the right are too busy pointing fingers and saying 'but they did it too', that they don't have to worry about being held accountable, because you will simply re-elect them or elect the next in line who will do more of the same.
 
yeah...unions are on equal footing because 11% of the workforce belongs to a union.

That's a mighty big chunk of the voting block they have control over, wouldn't ya say?

yes, that is a huge chunk for ONE organization to control

that 11% can make or break an election, to deny that shows once again how stupid you are....obama won by only a 7% majority

an 11 million strong union....and you're trying to act like its nothing, what a hack
 
Thomas is a fat piece of nothing.

And I thought that before he ever became a SCOTUS justice.

I have little/no respect for ANY of the SCTOUS justices...they all seem to break their oaths to honor the Constitution the minute they feel like it.

But this fat fuck is just pathetic.
 
What a creep.

WASHINGTON - Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas failed for at least five years to report on his financial disclosures his wife's income from a conservative policy group, according to the watchdog group Common Cause.

Between 2003 and 2007, Virginia Thomas, a longtime conservative activist, was paid $686,589 by the Heritage Foundation, according to a Common Cause review of Internal Revenue Service records. Thomas failed to note the income for those years, choosing instead to check a box titled "none" where "spousal non-investment income" should have been disclosed.

A Supreme Court spokesperson could not be reached for comment. Mrs. Thomas' employment by the Heritage Foundation was well-known at the time.

Mrs. Thomas also has been active in the group Liberty Central, which she founded to restore the "founding principles" of limited government and individual liberty.

In his 2009 disclosure, Justice Thomas also reported spousal income as "none." Common Cause says Liberty Central paid Thomas an unknown salary that year.

Federal judges are bound by law to disclose the source of spousal income, said Stephen Gillers, a law professor at New York University Law School.

"It could not have been an oversight," Gillers said.

Steven Lubet, an expert on judicial ethics at Northwestern University School of Law, said the failure to disclose spousal income "is not a crime of any sort, but there is a potential civil penalty."

http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/liv...fes-pay-for-years.html?adsec=politics&sid=101

If any Justices need to be impeached, Clarence Thomas is at the top of my list.
 
Back
Top