Gingrich for prez?

I do not care if my canidate cheats on his wife... I do care if he is a hypocrate.
 
I dont like the guys politics so I wont vote for him.

If the Religous right is consistant, they will not support him as he is a Catholic with a third wife who is 23 years younger than him. Both of his prior marriages ended due to his infidelity with the next wife.
 
I don't care if my candidate cheats on his wife or you perceive him as a hypocrite... I do care if he breaks the law and lies under oath.

Ahh, so you wont vote for Newt....

Good.

Oh and dont forget the three ethics charges he was found guilty of by the House Ethics Committee.
 
Did he lie under oath?

And oh btw... where did I say I wouldn't vote for Newt?

Ohh, I just assumed based on what you said... He lied under oath regarding the amount of money he spent on his girlfriend during his divorce.
 
I'm puzzled......you apparently WANT me to not care that your favorites are two timing cheaters, yet insist mine must not be......how does that work?.....

It works because Edwards dropped his 2008 candidacy and isn't trying for another run at presidency, while Newt is testing the waters for a 2012 run in spite of his history.
 
Newt and Palin both fall into the Danny E. Quayle of tabloid canidates.

They both stand a SMALL chance at the Republican Nomination, neither stand a snow balls chance in hell of beating the President.

I am more and more convenced the R's will nominate Romney, and I donw know who will win, Romney or Obama...
 
no surprise neither onceler or his butt buddy zappa could show where i backed peddled, but he sure thanked you for it!

:)

You tried to pretend the Gingrich & Clinton were pretty much the same kind of hypocrisy. Then, when you realized what an idiot you were, you made the outrageous argument that actually, hypocrisy doesn't really exist - because people ALWAYS criticize the other side, no matter what.

I'll have to remember that one the next time you accuse someone of hypocrisy.

LOL. What an idiot.
 
You tried to pretend the Gingrich & Clinton were pretty much the same kind of hypocrisy. Then, when you realized what an idiot you were, you made the outrageous argument that actually, hypocrisy doesn't really exist - because people ALWAYS criticize the other side, no matter what.

I'll have to remember that one the next time you accuse someone of hypocrisy.

LOL. What an idiot.

what? by saying hypocrisy exists..i said it didn't exist?

i never said hypocrisy doesn't exist, you cannot show a single statement of me ever saying that....

seriously, your lies are just weird
 
what? by saying hypocrisy exists..i said it didn't exist?

i never said hypocrisy doesn't exist, you cannot show a single statement of me ever saying that....

seriously, your lies are just weird

LOL

What a shocker - he runs from it now. Oh...because it was a stupid argument to begin with.

What an idiot.
 
For what it's worth, i think more countries should elect leaders named after amphibians.

It's either Newt Gingrich or the Lebanese opposition leader Ibrahim Anura.

Do it.
 
LOL

What a shocker - he runs from it now. Oh...because it was a stupid argument to begin with.

What an idiot.

seriously dude...what are you babbling about? i have not backed off anything i've said in this thread, my OP stands, my second post stands and so forth....

you're a weird little person that thinks "discussion and debating" is throwing out random lies about your adversary and then declaring yourself a winner

i think i'll start responding to you in like fashion and then maybe draw your out of this weird mindset
 
Back
Top