Handgun used to kill

In your opinion, perhaps.

I have enjoyed my time here.

I ask questions to gain insight, to clarify points, and to challenge assumptions.

I post links to items that discuss current events and solicit feedback.

Are you saying that is impermissible?

You ask em Mojo!

Your questions are awesome! I love the way your questions are state how evil the right is. You are so smart!
 
This is what you said.



By describing my penchant for asking "questions to gain insight and clarify points" as "The problem", I interpreted a negative connotation.

Was I incorrect?

An open exchange of ideas is always preferable to one person gaining insights while hiding their own opinions and beliefs.

Yes, there was a negative connotation. I have little respect for someone who avoids giving an opinion but wants to hear everyone else's opinion.
 
Did I say I was offended? I merely asked if gaining insights for yourself, while offering none, was what you intended to do.


An open exchange of ideas is always preferable to one person gaining insights while hiding their own opinions and beliefs.

Yes, there was a negative connotation. I have little respect for someone who avoids giving an opinion but wants to hear everyone else's opinion.


So you were offended?

I have not intended to offend you.
 
An open exchange of ideas is always preferable to one person gaining insights while hiding their own opinions and beliefs.

Yes, there was a negative connotation. I have little respect for someone who avoids giving an opinion but wants to hear everyone else's opinion.

do you really believe you're going to change him? he is trolling this way on purpose....nothing you can say, no amount of logic, will ever stop him from his current troll role....legion will never change his current troll behavior

and really, do you honestly expect an intelligent conversation with someone who is here solely to troll, in that, they are not here to discussion like you or i....
 
So you were offended?

I have not intended to offend you.

No, I am still not offended. Just because I dislike something or have no respect for something does not mean it offends me.
 
do you really believe you're going to change him? he is trolling this way on purpose....nothing you can say, no amount of logic, will ever stop him from his current troll role....legion will never change his current troll behavior

and really, do you honestly expect an intelligent conversation with someone who is here solely to troll, in that, they are not here to discussion like you or i....

Its a slow night, I am working in a small town and the satellite dish is out where I am staying. This is entertaining. At least somewhat so.
 
Dont-Feed-the-Trolls.png
.
 
oh, ok....just weren't sure you actually believed you were going to change him or have a logical discussion with him

Hell, I have argued with SM for pages upon pages, and we know he isn't going to change.

Nah, Mojo is what he is.
 
Hell, I have argued with SM for pages upon pages, and we know he isn't going to change.

Nah, Mojo is what he is.

this is true, its why i rarely get into with him about gay issues, on that subject, its circular reasoning and then he doesn't apply his logic to himself

the whole enabler argument is so absurd i can't believe he still trots it out
 
Do you think not replying will make him go away? Hell, he posted 4 or 5 times in the thread before anyone else joined in.

Its a slow day. Argue with him. Its not difficult to win.
In the long run, yes I do. It the short run, no it won't. He'll increase his efforts to be noticed, as you have already witnessed. He's trying to stay at the top of everyones minds.
 
Fear? Why must it be fear? Do you fear mosquitos? But they are damned annoying, aren't they?

So now "troll" has been redefined to mean some body whose posts you find "annoying"?

Now, please explain why annoyance gives any one the right to demand that my posts be "locked".
 
So now "troll" has been redefined to mean some body whose posts you find "annoying"?

Now, please explain why annoyance gives any one the right to demand that my posts be "locked".

Did I say the definition of "troll" has changed? Perhaps, if you stopped an thought about it, you would realize that people are annoyed by trolls, and the definition of troll never changed.

Has anyone demanded anything?
 
Did I say the definition of "troll" has changed? Perhaps, if you stopped an thought about it, you would realize that people are annoyed by trolls, and the definition of troll never changed.

Has anyone demanded anything?


"OldFezziwig" calls me a "troll", demands that my posts be ignored, and you defer to his judgment, apparently, since you apologized to "OldFezziwig" for responding to me.

So I'm not a troll?
 
"OldFezziwig" calls me a "troll", demands that my posts be ignored, and you defer to his judgment, apparently, since you apologized to "OldFezziwig" for responding to me.

So I'm not a troll?

Where did I say that you were not a troll?

Why do you fear locked threads?
 
Did I say the definition of "troll" has changed? Perhaps, if you stopped an thought about it, you would realize that people are annoyed by trolls, and the definition of troll never changed.

Has anyone demanded anything?

If "people are annoyed by trolls, and the definition of troll never changed", does that mean that if someone annoys you they are a "troll"?
 
If "people are annoyed by trolls, and the definition of troll never changed", does that mean that if someone annoys you they are a "troll"?

No. If rain comes from clouds, does that mean all clouds bring rain?
 
Back
Top