The Right Wing Can't Survive Without Stoking Anger

signalmankenneth

Verified User
By STEPHEN PIZZO AT TRUTHOUT

What's going to be fascinating to watch in the weeks and months ahead is how the Right adjusts to the new "kinder, gentler" rhetorical environment everyone - but them - is demanding.

If you have been a student of the new Right you understand that the gains they've made in American politics have come in direct proportion to a rising level of anger. Some of that anger was there just waiting for affirmation, but much more of it has been ginned up by rightwing talkers like Limbaugh, Beck and FOX News.

The anti-government mantra now hammered home 24/7/365 by these demagogic forces provided both cover and opportunity for rightwing politicians in Congress. It did so by rounding up the lower-common denominator types at the grassroots level by affirming their unease and distrust of a changing nation and world they simply cannot understand, much less accept.

Money and votes followed; money from corporate sources that always fund efforts to neuter government regulations and regulators, and votes from a class of voters only Barnum and Bailey could appreciate.

But, what if now the voices stoking all this rightwing blind fury are forced to clean up their acts? And, gasp, forced to stick to provable facts rather than the ones they manufacture to fuel more anger? What then?

Of course no one gives up a "good thing" if they can avoid it, and initially the Right will try blunt any trajectory towards tolerance and moderation.

Then there are the genuinely loony members of Congress who rode the Right's Anger Express to elected office. You know - like this one.

What I expect to see and hear in the days and weeks just ahead is a new -- and frankly jarring -- argument from the Right; civility in politics is a liberal plot. A plot against who? Well against the Right, of course. There's nothing a zealot likes more than to claim the cloak of persecution. It's always the last refuge of scoundrels, be it demagogic politicians or Christians, Jews, Muslims or Scientologists. Call them on their nonsense and they scream "persecution."

In this case the Right is going to be forced to take a position that unmasks them once and for all. Without their patented violent, hate-inciting rhetoric, the Right has nothing to offer America. Nothing.

Which explains why they're going to fight -- not for civility -- bit for more incivility.

Imagine that?
lester.jpg
 
So Kenny has no intentions of following President Obama's advice either, that makes it pretty much unanimous among the liberal left on this board, and here again, is an editorial from another liberal, who continues to defy President Obama and attempt to point the finger of blame at the Right. I guess the President's words didn't really mean a thing to the left. It's business as usual, as they attempt to claim some kind of credit for the accolades Obama received from the speech... yep, he knocked it out of the park alright, but the liberals don't believe a word he said, and continue to defy and contradict what he said. AMAZING!
 
Do you prefer the advice of Glenn Beck, who said "God will wash this nation with blood if he has to"?

http://uknewsreporter.co.uk/shootin...ck-vulnerable-to-political-maelstrom/6710936/

No, I prefer you go slither back under the rock you crawled out from, and you can take the rest of your slimy lying dishonest hack buddies with you. Don't you EVER suggest to me, that we "tone down the rhetoric" in our discourse, EVER AGAIN! You lying manipulating pieces of shit don't want to have civil discourse, you never have, never will... it's what makes you LIBERALS! You want to try and play on people's emotions and hoodwink people into believing you are sincere, when all you really want, is to silence political voices on the right, so you can further implement your socialist policies. THAT is all that matters to a liberal, you don't give a flying fuck how many innocent people are shot or killed, you'll use their corpses as weapons against the right, and never bat an eye! That's what a bunch of despicable lowlifes you've become.
 
No, I prefer you go slither back under the rock you crawled out from, and you can take the rest of your slimy lying dishonest hack buddies with you. Don't you EVER suggest to me, that we "tone down the rhetoric" in our discourse, EVER AGAIN! You lying manipulating pieces of shit don't want to have civil discourse, you never have, never will... it's what makes you LIBERALS! You want to try and play on people's emotions and hoodwink people into believing you are sincere, when all you really want, is to silence political voices on the right, so you can further implement your socialist policies. THAT is all that matters to a liberal, you don't give a flying fuck how many innocent people are shot or killed, you'll use their corpses as weapons against the right, and never bat an eye! That's what a bunch of despicable lowlifes you've become.

Did I ask you to "tone down your rhetoric"?

You seem upset.

Are you thinking of shooting someone right now?
 
No, I prefer you go slither back under the rock you crawled out from, and you can take the rest of your slimy lying dishonest hack buddies with you. Don't you EVER suggest to me, that we "tone down the rhetoric" in our discourse, EVER AGAIN! You lying manipulating pieces of shit don't want to have civil discourse, you never have, never will... it's what makes you LIBERALS! You want to try and play on people's emotions and hoodwink people into believing you are sincere, when all you really want, is to silence political voices on the right, so you can further implement your socialist policies. THAT is all that matters to a liberal, you don't give a flying fuck how many innocent people are shot or killed, you'll use their corpses as weapons against the right, and never bat an eye! That's what a bunch of despicable lowlifes you've become.

I sugest you tone down the rhetoric!
 
Were these people liberals?

Daniel E. Petersen

Richard T. Serafin

Dean Pleasant

Don Benny Anderson

John Salvi

John Brockhoeft

Perry Landis

Paul Darland

Ron Cole

Bradford Metcalf

Kenneth Carter

Randy Graham

John Maurice Stephenson

Robert Starr III

Troy Spain

Jimmy McCranie

Finis Walker

David Belliveau

Kenneth B. Kimbley Jr

Eric Rudolph

Justin Carl Moose

Paul Ross Evans

James Kopp

Paul Jennings Hill

Scott Roeder

Michael F. Griffin

Peter James Knight

Matt Goldsby

Jimmy Simmons

Kathy Simmons

Kaye Wiggins

David Koresh

Martin Uphoff

John Earl

Patricia Hughes

Jeremy Dunahoe

David McMenemy

Chad Altman

Sergio Baca

Matthew L. Derosia

Clayton Waagner

Michael Fortier

Terry Nichols

Lori Fortier

Bruce Edwards Ivins

James W. Von Brunn

John Patrick Bedell
 
By STEPHEN PIZZO AT TRUTHOUT

What's going to be fascinating to watch in the weeks and months ahead is how the Right adjusts to the new "kinder, gentler" rhetorical environment everyone - but them - is demanding.

If you have been a student of the new Right you understand that the gains they've made in American politics have come in direct proportion to a rising level of anger. Some of that anger was there just waiting for affirmation, but much more of it has been ginned up by rightwing talkers like Limbaugh, Beck and FOX News.

The anti-government mantra now hammered home 24/7/365 by these demagogic forces provided both cover and opportunity for rightwing politicians in Congress. It did so by rounding up the lower-common denominator types at the grassroots level by affirming their unease and distrust of a changing nation and world they simply cannot understand, much less accept.

Money and votes followed; money from corporate sources that always fund efforts to neuter government regulations and regulators, and votes from a class of voters only Barnum and Bailey could appreciate.

But, what if now the voices stoking all this rightwing blind fury are forced to clean up their acts? And, gasp, forced to stick to provable facts rather than the ones they manufacture to fuel more anger? What then?

Of course no one gives up a "good thing" if they can avoid it, and initially the Right will try blunt any trajectory towards tolerance and moderation.

Then there are the genuinely loony members of Congress who rode the Right's Anger Express to elected office. You know - like this one.

What I expect to see and hear in the days and weeks just ahead is a new -- and frankly jarring -- argument from the Right; civility in politics is a liberal plot. A plot against who? Well against the Right, of course. There's nothing a zealot likes more than to claim the cloak of persecution. It's always the last refuge of scoundrels, be it demagogic politicians or Christians, Jews, Muslims or Scientologists. Call them on their nonsense and they scream "persecution."

In this case the Right is going to be forced to take a position that unmasks them once and for all. Without their patented violent, hate-inciting rhetoric, the Right has nothing to offer America. Nothing.

Which explains why they're going to fight -- not for civility -- bit for more incivility.

Imagine that?
lester.jpg

not just anger, but fear is their other trademark

however, not necessarily those on this board (if you ignore dix)
 
Nope... sorry, not toning a goddamn thing down until the liberal left stops trying to exploit this tragedy for political gain.


Ohh, what a shame, you wont take the presidents advice...

Oh, well... Typical...
 
Ohh, what a shame, you wont take the presidents advice...

Oh, well... Typical...

Nope, not taking any advice to tone down the rhetoric, until we come to an understanding as to why we are doing it. As long as the loony left wants to prop up an argument that political rhetoric causes crazy people to commit acts of violence, and not because crazy people do crazy things which we can't explain with rational thought... then, nope, we're not toning down a damn thing. Obama got it right, why can't you? I praised Obama for his speech, which is FAR more than you've ever done for a Bush speech, I guarantee you that! But if the president's point is falling on deaf ears with his liberal base, then why should I even consider adhering to his advice?
 
Nope, not taking any advice to tone down the rhetoric, until we come to an understanding as to why we are doing it. As long as the loony left wants to prop up an argument that political rhetoric causes crazy people to commit acts of violence, and not because crazy people do crazy things which we can't explain with rational thought... then, nope, we're not toning down a damn thing. Obama got it right, why can't you? I praised Obama for his speech, which is FAR more than you've ever done for a Bush speech, I guarantee you that! But if the president's point is falling on deaf ears with his liberal base, then why should I even consider adhering to his advice?

What comes first? Dixie has a hart attack while typing responces on JPP {or} Dixie posts photos of himself with a red gstring and a glock...
 
What comes first? Dixie has a hart attack while typing responces on JPP {or} Dixie posts photos of himself with a red gstring and a glock...

I know that you might think I am sitting here typing frantically with my blood vessels popping out, gritting my teeth in anger, but you are SOOOooooo far from the truth, it isn't even funny.... no, I take that back, it's hysterically funny!

Do you honestly think, whatever your pinhead incompetent ass has to say here, is enough to make me get upset? REALLY? I get more upset over mildew in my shower, pinhead! You are nothing more than a TOY to me... I just like to paw at you and watch you wiggle around.
 
Back
Top