Postings of a Troubled Mind

cawacko said:
Wow, this stuff is frightening especially with hindsight. This article lists a bunch of posts he made on gaming sites. Nothing about politics here but obviously a very very troubled young man. He wrote about job woes and rejection by women.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...75851892478080.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories
Click to expand...

some purported friend of his has given an interview and he said the guy never watched tv, and did not listen to talk radio, was neither pub or dem

but i doubt the left will ever apologize for their onslaught this past weekend
 
Yurt said:
some purported friend of his has given an interview and he said the guy never watched tv, and did not listen to talk radio, was neither pub or dem

but i doubt the left will ever apologize for their onslaught this past weekend
Click to expand...

I posted a copy of the interview that friends.

I'm not trying to get into a partisan pissing match by posting this. For the most part all we've heard is speculation about the guy. Now we are least getting some solid insight.
 
cawacko said:
I posted a copy of the interview that friends.

I'm not trying to get into a partisan pissing match by posting this. For the most part all we've heard is speculation about the guy. Now we are least getting some solid insight.
Click to expand...

A former aquaintance who hasn't spoken to Loughner in two years is "solid insight"?

If you say so.
 
Mojo said:
A former aquaintance who hasn't spoken to Loughner in two years is "solid insight"?

If you say so.
Click to expand...

Its a far better insight than most of the liberals have used to blame the tea party and palin.
 
Mojo said:
How so?
Click to expand...

Someone gives info concerning a long time friend, and other who don't know a single thing about him blame a politician and a map, and you ask why is the first more a solid insight?

:palm:
 
cawacko said:
I posted a copy of the interview that friends.

I'm not trying to get into a partisan pissing match by posting this. For the most part all we've heard is speculation about the guy. Now we are least getting some solid insight.
Click to expand...

true...better insight than some this weekend
 
WinterBorn said:
Someone gives info concerning a long time friend, and other who don't know a single thing about him blame a politician and a map, and you ask why is the first more a solid insight?

:palm:
Click to expand...

WB, you are obviously free to do what you want but you know what this troll's M.O. is and it is not to a have real rational discussion.
 
WinterBorn said:
Someone gives info concerning a long time friend, and other who don't know a single thing about him blame a politician and a map, and you ask why is the first more a solid insight?

:palm:
Click to expand...

I do, and you haven't explained how one self-described "ex-friend" who admitted "Loughner stopped talking to his friends last March. In fact, he had no contact with Tierney in the ten months leading up to Saturday's voice mail" is totally conclusive evidence.

Do you just want to believe Loughner was apolitical?
 
cawacko said:
WB, you are obviously free to do what you want but you know what this troll's M.O. is and it is not to a have real rational discussion.
Click to expand...

I understand that, CA. I also understand that I can get a point across to other people with the postings in response to his trolling.
 
WinterBorn said:
I understand that, CA. I also understand that I can get a point across to other people with the postings in response to his trolling.
Click to expand...

Why do you consider being asked to examine your prejudices "trolling"?

Loughner's ex-friend said this: "I hadn't heard from him in a long, long time..."

He was asked "Did you see anything in that face or in those eyes that was the Jared Loughner that you knew, who was a friend of yours?"

His answer: "Absolutely not, no. No."

People change.
 
Mojo said:
I do, and you haven't explained how one self-described "ex-friend" who admitted "Loughner stopped talking to his friends last March. In fact, he had no contact with Tierney in the ten months leading up to Saturday's voice mail" is totally conclusive evidence.
Click to expand...

I didn't say it was totally conclusive evidence. I simply said it was far better evidence than the liberals blaming Palin's map. You are welcome to dispute that if you like.


His friend hasn't talked to him in 10 months? And this lunatic changed his entire life in 10 months?

I have friends I haven't talked to in a year or more. Are you going to say that you (or a news media outlet) knows them better than I do?
 
WinterBorn said:
I didn't say it was totally conclusive evidence. I simply said it was far better evidence than the liberals blaming Palin's map. You are welcome to dispute that if you like.


His friend hasn't talked to him in 10 months? And this lunatic changed his entire life in 10 months?

I have friends I haven't talked to in a year or more. Are you going to say that you (or a news media outlet) knows them better than I do?
Click to expand...

You said it was "solid insight".

Are you going to say people can't change in 10 months?

A lot of people say Loughner is insane.

Do insane people react differently to stimuli than rational ones?
 
Mojo said:
You said it was "solid insight".

Are you going to say people can't change in 10 months?

A lot of people say Loughner is insane.

Do insane people react differently to stimuli than rational ones?
Click to expand...

I am one of those saying he is insane. But his friend makes the claim that Loughner has always been uninterested in the news or talk radio. Unless you have some evidence that this changed, the assumption that he was motivated by Palin's map is political grandstanding and a disgusting perversion of a horrible tragedy.
 
WinterBorn said:
I am one of those saying he is insane. But his friend makes the claim that Loughner has always been uninterested in the news or talk radio. Unless you have some evidence that this changed, the assumption that he was motivated by Palin's map is political grandstanding and a disgusting perversion of a horrible tragedy.
Click to expand...

In your opinion.

Others see it as an inevitable outcome of a poisonous diatribe from the right.

You have no evidence that it didn't change, and only one guy's word for it that Loughner never listened to radio or TV.

That guy hadn't talked to Loughner in a long time.

So, again, is that "solid insight"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top