Dem example gun rhetoric: dlc-targeting-strategy

T

tinfoil

Banned
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/palin-target-graphic-in-perspective/dlc-targeting-strategy/

dlc-targeting-strategy.gif


LOL
 
You folks on the right are so immature, it is laughable. There will never be an event that will moderate your childish behavior unless it is a personal epiphany.

It will have to be your wife, mother, sister or daughter fighting for her life with a bullet through her brain to suddenly see.
 
Bfgrn said:
You folks on the right are so immature, it is laughable. There will never be an event that will moderate your childish behavior unless it is a personal epiphany.

It will have to be your wife, mother, sister or daughter fighting for her life with a bullet through her brain to suddenly see.
Click to expand...

LOL.... the immaturity is on display from the idiots like you who proclaim this lunatic acted because of Palin's map. The point of this thread was that both parties have used 'targeting' maps before. While they may rethink the use of crosshairs in the future, the absurdity of the proclamations by immature morons like you that this lunatic acted as a result of her map is pathetic.

Grow the fuck up and quit looking to blame the people you hate for everything that goes wrong.

This guy was a fucked up individual. His mental state was unstable to say the least.
 
Superfreak said:
LOL.... the immaturity is on display from the idiots like you who proclaim this lunatic acted because of Palin's map. The point of this thread was that both parties have used 'targeting' maps before. While they may rethink the use of crosshairs in the future, the absurdity of the proclamations by immature morons like you that this lunatic acted as a result of her map is pathetic.

Grow the fuck up and quit looking to blame the people you hate for everything that goes wrong.

This guy was a fucked up individual. His mental state was unstable to say the least.
Click to expand...

This is as BIG of a false equivalency as is humanly possible. You can't call us liberals pacifists, sissies, bleeding hearts and weaklings one day to fit your bluster, then turn around and say liberals are just as militant, war like, macho and aggressive as the right the next day.

Stand up for what you are...and face the facts.
 
Bfgrn said:
This is as BIG of a false equivalency as is humanly possible. You can't call us liberals pacifists, sissies, bleeding hearts and weaklings one day to fit your bluster, then turn around and say liberals are just as militant, war like, macho and aggressive as the right the next day.

Stand up for what you are...and face the facts.
Click to expand...

Bring a gun to a fight Bfgrn and not a knife?
 
Bfgrn said:
There are examples of bad language on the left, but it still isn't even close to 50/50.
Click to expand...

I have made zero posts (until this previous one) about rhetoric and I'm not going to start getting into it now about which "side" uses worse language. There are several hundred posts already on it. But please spare me the family member getting shot b.s.
 
cawacko said:
I have made zero posts (until this previous one) about rhetoric and I'm not going to start getting into it now about which "side" uses worse language. There are several hundred posts already on it. But please spare me the family member getting shot b.s.
Click to expand...

Yea, you certainly wouldn't want to acquire empathy at this stage of life. It is too liberal, moderating and self enlightening.


It behooves every man who values liberty of conscience for himself, to resist invasions of it in the case of others: or their case may, by change of circumstances, become his own.
Thomas Jefferson
 
Bfgrn said:
Yea, you certainly wouldn't want to acquire empathy at this stage of life. It is too liberal, moderating and self enlightening.


It behooves every man who values liberty of conscience for himself, to resist invasions of it in the case of others: or their case may, by change of circumstances, become his own.
Thomas Jefferson[/QUOT

Empathy for what? I would be devestated if someone shot a family member of mine. Since it has not happened I cannot say for 100% fact how I would react. But I wouldn't sit there and start crying about guns laws.
Click to expand...
 
cawacko said:
Bfgrn said:
Yea, you certainly wouldn't want to acquire empathy at this stage of life. It is too liberal, moderating and self enlightening.


It behooves every man who values liberty of conscience for himself, to resist invasions of it in the case of others: or their case may, by change of circumstances, become his own.
Thomas Jefferson[/QUOT

Empathy for what? I would be devestated if someone shot a family member of mine. Since it has not happened I cannot say for 100% fact how I would react. But I wouldn't sit there and start crying about guns laws.
Click to expand...

If your mother were running for office, and someone of national prominence from the other party placed your mother in a gun sight on her personal website, and her opponent ran a fundraiser by advertising:

“Get on target for victory. Help remove cawacko's mother from office. Shoot a fully automatic M16 with Jesse Kelly”

Would your first concern be that national figure and her opponent's first amendment rights?

Would there be some anxiety every time she went out on the campaign trail?
Click to expand...
 
Bfgrn said:
cawacko said:
If your mother were running for office, and someone of national prominence from the other party placed your mother in a gun sight on her personal website, and her opponent ran a fundraiser by advertising:

“Get on target for victory. Help remove cawacko's mother from office. Shoot a fully automatic M16 with Jesse Kelly”

Would your first concern be that national figure and her opponent's first amendment rights?

Would there be some anxiety every time she went out on the campaign trail?
Click to expand...

When it comes to family I'm a hypocrite because I care about them and not other people's rights. At the end of the day family is most important and everyone else can go f themselves.

Fortunately my family isn't that political but if my mom wanted to run for office I would tell her not to. Don't know if she would listen but politicians are scum and I think to highly of her for her to be one.

If she ran and I thought her opponent really said shoot her I would go after her opponent. Not with a gun but through the media. All else fails I would find a way to confront him/her personally.
Click to expand...
 
cawacko said:
When it comes to family I'm a hypocrite because I care about them and not other people's rights. At the end of the day family is most important and everyone else can go f themselves.

Fortunately my family isn't that political but if my mom wanted to run for office I would tell her not to. Don't know if she would listen but politicians are scum and I think to highly of her for her to be one.

If she ran and I thought her opponent really said shoot her I would go after her opponent. Not with a gun but through the media. All else fails I would find a way to confront him/her personally.
Click to expand...

You're not a hypocrite, you are human. No candidate or their family should have to face that form of anxiety or intimidation.

My favorite President is John F. Kennedy. He and his family considered public service as the highest calling a person could aspire to, and the most patriotic thing any man or woman could do is serve our great republic.



jfkspeechicon.jpg
Remarks at Amherst College, October 26, 1963

There is inherited wealth in this country and also inherited poverty. And unless the graduates of this college and other colleges like it who are given a running start in life--unless they are willing to put back into our society, those talents, the broad sympathy, the understanding, the compassion--unless they are willing to put those qualities back into the service of the Great Republic, then obviously the presuppositions upon which our democracy are based are bound to be fallible.

The problems which this country now faces are staggering, both at home and abroad. We need the service, in the great sense, of every educated man or woman to find 10 million jobs in the next 2 1/2 years, to govern our relations--a country which lived in isolation for 150 years, and is now suddenly the leader of the free world--to govern our relations with over 100 countries, to govern those relations with success so that the balance of power remains strong on the side of freedom, to make it possible for Americans of all different races and creeds to live together in harmony, to make it possible for a world to exist in diversity and freedom. All this requires the best of all of us.

Therefore, I am proud to come to this college, whose graduates have recognized this obligation and to say to those who are now here that the need is endless, and I am confident that you will respond.

Robert Frost said:

Two roads diverged in a wood, and I--
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.

I hope that road will not be the less traveled by, and I hope your commitment to the Great Republic's interest in the years to come will be worthy of your long inheritance since your beginning.

I look forward to a great future for America, a future in which our country will match its military strength with our moral restraint, its wealth with our wisdom, its power with our purpose. I look forward to an America which will not be afraid of grace and beauty, which will protect the beauty of our natural environment, which will preserve the great old American houses and squares and parks of our national past, and which will build handsome and balanced cities for our future.

I look forward to an America which will reward achievement in the arts as we reward achievement in business or statecraft. I look forward to an America which will steadily raise the standards of artistic accomplishment and which will steadily enlarge cultural opportunities for all of our citizens. And I look forward to an America which commands respect throughout the world not only for its strength but for its civilization as well. And I look forward to a world which will be safe not only for democracy and diversity but also for personal distinction.

Robert Frost was often skeptical about projects for human improvement, yet I do not think he would disdain this hope. As he wrote during the uncertain days of the Second War:

Take human nature altogether since time
began . . .
And it must be a little more in favor of
man,
Say a fraction of one percent at the very
least . . .
Our hold on this planet wouldn't have so
increased.


Because of Mr. Frost's life and work, because of the life and work of this college, our hold on this planet has increased.

http://www.jfklibrary.org/Research/Ready-Reference/JFK-Speeches/Remarks-at-Amherst-College-October-26-1963.aspx
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top