Majority of Republicans believe in literal creationism

I dont have to have an explanation to know that yours is based in wishful thinking, and has zero proof.

Uhmm, but oh yes you DO have to have an explanation if you are going to proclaim other explanations invalid. You have zero proof as well. In fact, your idea is rife with 'wishful thinking' not mine.
 
Everytime you go over it becomes wronger, more stupid, and more harmful to the discourse.

Rarity and unlikeliness also do not prove god.

There is no discourse, just ignorant ranting from proles like you and Mott, who place all faith in science and nothing else, yet defy the very principles of science, in proclaiming something to be absolute, when it has not been proven absolute.

Nothing "proves" God, but... nothing "disproves" God either! Why can't you get that through your thick skull? Intelligent Creation doesn't necessarily conclude God exists! That is a fallacy you've constructed on your own here. Perhaps the universe was created by an intelligence from another dimension which we are unaware of as humans? Not a "God" but an Intelligent Designer nonetheless.
 
NO there isn't. Your nonsense-based faith doesn't change that.

denial is strong in this one

intelligent atheists and agnostics admit there is some evidence, though, they at least try to counter argue the evidence, to say there is zero evidence is simply dumb. you're not entirely dumb, so i'll give you a chance to change your mind.
 
denial is strong in this one

intelligent atheists and agnostics admit there is some evidence, though, they at least try to counter argue the evidence, to say there is zero evidence is simply dumb. you're not entirely dumb, so i'll give you a chance to change your mind.

What atheist admits there is some evidence?

There is zero evidence.

Demands for another explanation are not evidence. The citation of complexity is not evidence. maybe god being everything, or a giant scientist, or the laws of physics, or energy is just an admission of having no case.
 
What atheist admits there is some evidence?

There is zero evidence.

Demands for another explanation are not evidence. The citation of complexity is not evidence. maybe god being everything, or a giant scientist, or the laws of physics, or energy is just an admission of having no case.

google evidence for a world wide flood

i could go on, but it wouldn't matter what i said, do your own research, you'll find evidence. the evidence doesn't amount to proof, but there is evidence. i wrote papers on such evidence in college, it exists.

look up author harold g. coffin
 
google evidence for a world wide flood

i could go on, but it wouldn't matter what i said, do your own research, you'll find evidence. the evidence doesn't amount to proof, but there is evidence. i wrote papers on such evidence in college, it exists.

look up author harold g. coffin

A worldwide flood isn't god either.
 
No it isn't. You're a fool. Quit enabling theocratic abuse with your stupidity.

YES IT IS! x1,000,000!

Look... can you provide ANY physical proof of human imagination? Of course, you can provide evidence to suggest humans have imagination, it's all around us! But can you provide physical proof of the existence of the actual human imagination? Does that mean it doesn't exist and is not possible? That is what you are saying about a Creator. You are arguing, that since we can't "see" a Creator, there isn't one. We can't "see" someone's imagination! Yet, we do have evidence that people have imaginations!

I've tried to explain concepts of God to you, which hopefully, you could relate to... but it has been no use. I have likened God to "energy" and you have mocked that, without any counter-argument, just dismissed it completely as nonsense. Now... if God has got to be a human-like invisible man who lives in the sky and speaks with a Charleton Heston voice... then, I don't believe in that God either! It's preposterous to believe God would have human attributes, or live in the sky, have a white beard, or talk like an American actor! This is the characterization of God you have developed, and reject, and I don't blame you... if THAT is God, I don't believe in God either!

This doesn't mean the universe wasn't the product of creation. This doesn't mean, life was not intelligently designed. There is NO SCIENCE which proves this invalid, nor can it ever! There is only YOUR OPINION, and it stands alone, naked and shivering, without a shred of basis for support. This is why you must revert to ridicule and mock others, you have no basis for what you believe.
 
YES IT IS! x1,000,000!

Look... can you provide ANY physical proof of human imagination? Of course, you can provide evidence to suggest humans have imagination, it's all around us! But can you provide physical proof of the existence of the actual human imagination? Does that mean it doesn't exist and is not possible? That is what you are saying about a Creator. You are arguing, that since we can't "see" a Creator, there isn't one. We can't "see" someone's imagination! Yet, we do have evidence that people have imaginations!

I've tried to explain concepts of God to you, which hopefully, you could relate to... but it has been no use. I have likened God to "energy" and you have mocked that, without any counter-argument, just dismissed it completely as nonsense. Now... if God has got to be a human-like invisible man who lives in the sky and speaks with a Charleton Heston voice... then, I don't believe in that God either! It's preposterous to believe God would have human attributes, or live in the sky, have a white beard, or talk like an American actor! This is the characterization of God you have developed, and reject, and I don't blame you... if THAT is God, I don't believe in God either!

This doesn't mean the universe wasn't the product of creation. This doesn't mean, life was not intelligently designed. There is NO SCIENCE which proves this invalid, nor can it ever! There is only YOUR OPINION, and it stands alone, naked and shivering, without a shred of basis for support. This is why you must revert to ridicule and mock others, you have no basis for what you believe.


All your 'concepts' are ignorant assertions and tortured metaphors.

Yes. I mock that god is energy. Energy is energy. God is not energy. And if god is energy, you might as well just call it energy. Does energy design things?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top