HOW dumb is Christine O'Donnell??

zappasguitar

Well-known member
The darling of the Tea Party...and now wonder!

She's at the top of the Tea Party intellectual ladder.

WILMINGTON, Del. — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware on Tuesday questioned whether the U.S. Constitution calls for a separation of church and state, appearing to not know that the First Amendment bars the government from establishing religion.

The exchange came in a debate before an audience of legal scholars and law students at Widener University Law School, as O'Donnell criticized Democratic nominee Chris Coons' position that teaching creationism in public school would violate the First Amendment by promoting religious doctrine.

Coons said private and parochial schools are free to teach creationism but that "religious doctrine doesn't belong in our public schools."

"Where in the Constitution is the separation of church and state?" O'Donnell asked him.

When Coons responded that the First Amendment bars Congress from making laws respecting the establishment of religion, O'Donnell asked: "You're telling me that's in the First Amendment?"

Her comments, in a debate aired on radio station WDEL, generated a buzz in the audience.

"You actually audibly heard the crowd gasp," Widener University political scientist Wesley Leckrone said after the debate, adding that it raised questions about O'Donnell's grasp of the Constitution.
 
Last edited:
Actually, until the 14th, technically there was no mandatory separation at the state level, although the last state churches were disestablished in the 1830s, well before the passage of the 14th.
 
HOW dumb is Christiane O'Donnell??

I'll give it a go...

As dumb as a hammer, a box of rocks, owl shit, a stump, a brick? The only way she'll be elected is if she buys a pushup bra, wears a low cut blouse and a short skirt and does a pole dance at her teabagger rallies.

She's less qualified for any public office than Sara Palin.
 
HOW dumb is Christiane O'Donnell??

I'll give it a go...

As dumb as a hammer, a box of rocks, owl shit, a stump, a brick? The only way she'll be elected is if she buys a pushup bra, wears a low cut blouse and a short skirt and does a pole dance at her teabagger rallies.

She's less qualified for any public office than Sara Palin.

Well, it's interesting though - how qualified are any of them? What really, qualifies you to become a United States Senator and make informed decisions on public and foreign policies? Do you know how dumb some of these guys are? I mean serious buffoons? Joe Wilson, okay he is just a congressman, but the guy, if you listen to him speak? His IQ is well below average. If he hits triple digits I'll drop dead. No way.

Joe Lieberman is an outright dummy. A lot of liberals hate him and they think oh he's plotting this and he is really out to do that. Joe Lieberman is a f'ing moron. If you were sitting next to him at a dinner party you'd be like, wow, this guy is dumb.

You know, a lot of these guys don't know shit from shineola and are in no way qualified when they are first elected, and a good many of them never pursue any sort of growth and so are never qualified to making decisions of magnitude. I have always believed, and I know everyone will go, oh, there goes darla again, but I have always believed that a white guy who is a moron can go far. But a woman, she must excel. So when you have to have surgery or something, you are much better off going with a woman surgeon, because she didn't get where she is by skating by with the other members of the boys' club. She got where she is because she knows something.

The alarming, and offensive problem with these tea party people is that they don't just let ignorance skate by, but rather they celebrate it. They also glorify sex appeal. So you end up with a lot of good looking women who are encouraged to behave and speak in an ignorant manner. And this is a very bad, and even embarrassing thing for all women of any thought whatsoever.

But I don't like to ever forget that there are plenty of borderline retards in the Senate and always have been. And when you move down to COngress, look, three quarters of them would qualify for special education help at any given time.
 
O'Donnell's just more honest than the others. Whereas she'll come right out and say that teaching creationism is kosher under the Constitution because there is no separation of church and state in the First Amendment, the dishonest support the same policies but dress it up in "teach the controversy" and "intelligent design" claptrap.

Personally, I'll take the honest version over the horseshit.
 
The darling of the Tea Party...and now wonder!

She's at the top of the Tea Party intellectual ladder.

WILMINGTON, Del. — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware on Tuesday questioned whether the U.S. Constitution calls for a separation of church and state, appearing to not know that the First Amendment bars the government from establishing religion.

The exchange came in a debate before an audience of legal scholars and law students at Widener University Law School, as O'Donnell criticized Democratic nominee Chris Coons' position that teaching creationism in public school would violate the First Amendment by promoting religious doctrine.

Coons said private and parochial schools are free to teach creationism but that "religious doctrine doesn't belong in our public schools."

"Where in the Constitution is the separation of church and state?" O'Donnell asked him.

When Coons responded that the First Amendment bars Congress from making laws respecting the establishment of religion, O'Donnell asked: "You're telling me that's in the First Amendment?"

Her comments, in a debate aired on radio station WDEL, generated a buzz in the audience.

"You actually audibly heard the crowd gasp," Widener University political scientist Wesley Leckrone said after the debate, adding that it raised questions about O'Donnell's grasp of the Constitution.


And "now" wonder what, Einstein?
 
This seems to be a constant litany from you. Interesting. But yeah, when you are calling somebody else "stupid" it is best to spell things correctly.

True. Especially the laying on the alter stuff that I heard about.


Physician, heal thyself...

So a misspelled word is evidence of stupidity?

What can we then deduce about Damo, who misspelled the word "alter" instead of "altar".

Spin this one brainiac.
 
Physician, heal thyself...

So a misspelled word is evidence of stupidity?

What can we then deduce about Damo, who misspelled the word "alter" instead of "altar".

Spin this one brainiac.

LOL

That's why I try to avoid the temptation of pointing out spelling errors. I have rarely seen someone do it without making an error themselves, if not in that exact post, soon after.

I do point out when someone simply cannot write coherently, because that signals something else all together.

Well, Damo has egg on his face now! lol
 
That's why I just said there were two and left it at that. I know I screw it up from time to time....and I even try to be careful when posting.
 
Back
Top