Stringfield And Apple: The same except for...

Sammy Jankis

Was it me?
Both stringfield and apple are globalization advocates.

Apple is actually more honest on the impact it will have on american lives. It will hurt us, and that's in accordance with apples' hatred for america.

Stringfield hates america too, but he is more dishonest, and is pretending somehow like outsourcing as many jobs as possible and becoming too dependant on imports and overseas labor is somehow good for americans.

Apple is worthy of more respect than stringfield, because at least apple is honest.

Stringfield is a traitorous internationalist fascist liar, worthy of the lowest form of disrespect and derision.

Please treat him accordingly.
 
You are not nearly as much of an internationalist nationalist or Jewish supporter of Islam as me. You are just imitation Naugahyde.

Durka durka.

See, the new fascism is internationalist in flavor. While previous fascisms rallied around the country, this new internationalist fascism is determined to destroy all nations, or reduce their governments so they are mere enforcers of multinational corporate policy.

Im open to new terms to describe it. I think internationalist fascism is the best one so far.
 
The nation has not disappeared. We used to believe that the concept was totally without substance. Instead we see the nation arise as a palpitating reality before us! ... Class cannot destroy the nation. Class reveals itself as a collection of interests—but the nation is a history of sentiments, traditions, language, culture, and race. Class can become an integral part of the nation, but the one cannot eclipse the other.
The class struggle is a vain formula, without effect and consequence wherever one finds a people that has not integrated itself into its proper linguistic and racial confines—where the national problem has not been definitely resolved. In such circumstances the class movement finds itself impaired by an inauspicious historic climate.


:clap:
 
The nation has not disappeared. We used to believe that the concept was totally without substance. Instead we see the nation arise as a palpitating reality before us! ... Class cannot destroy the nation. Class reveals itself as a collection of interests—but the nation is a history of sentiments, traditions, language, culture, and race. Class can become an integral part of the nation, but the one cannot eclipse the other.
The class struggle is a vain formula, without effect and consequence wherever one finds a people that has not integrated itself into its proper linguistic and racial confines—where the national problem has not been definitely resolved. In such circumstances the class movement finds itself impaired by an inauspicious historic climate.


:clap:


But in internationalist fascism, national unity is destroyed, as multinational corporate ceo's and managers cheerily destroy the lives of other citizens on behalf of their overseas masters, and then feel enlightened about it.
 
Both stringfield and apple are globalization advocates.

Apple is actually more honest on the impact it will have on american lives. It will hurt us, and that's in accordance with apples' hatred for america.

Stringfield hates america too, but he is more dishonest, and is pretending somehow like outsourcing as many jobs as possible and becoming too dependant on imports and overseas labor is somehow good for americans.

Apple is worthy of more respect than stringfield, because at least apple is honest.

Stringfield is a traitorous internationalist fascist liar, worthy of the lowest form of disrespect and derision.

Please treat him accordingly.

Hatred? You're the expert when it comes to hatred.

All the western world has to make an adjustment, not just the US, unless you have a better idea on how to balance things.
 
But in internationalist fascism, national unity is destroyed, as multinational corporate ceo's and managers cheerily destroy the lives of other citizens on behalf of their overseas masters, and then feel enlightened about it.

Look at Afghanistan. The tribes operate on a form of nationalism and proceed to kill each other. We all know a united Afghanistan would be better for all the people of Afghanistan but the tribal leaders are against one country government just like you're against one world government. Do you see the similarity?
 
Hatred? You're the expert when it comes to hatred.

All the western world has to make an adjustment, not just the US, unless you have a better idea on how to balance things.

We don't have to balance things. Our economies don't have to be interdependant. This is a massive fiction.
 
Look at Afghanistan. The tribes operate on a form of nationalism and proceed to kill each other. We all know a united Afghanistan would be better for all the people of Afghanistan but the tribal leaders are against one country government just like you're against one world government. Do you see the similarity?

That's tribalism.
 
MS is better than Apple!!!

Internationalist fascism remains, as before, an oxymoron. Carry on!

No. Internationalist is an adjective which describes the new kind of fascism the globalists are pushing for. Hence, we have internationalist fascism, the new fascism which seeks to reduce the governments of all nations to mere skeletal versions which merely enforce the policy desires of multinational corporations.
 
Back
Top