Stringfield And Apple: The same except for...

Sammy Jankis

Sammy Jankis

Was it me?
Both stringfield and apple are globalization advocates.

Apple is actually more honest on the impact it will have on american lives. It will hurt us, and that's in accordance with apples' hatred for america.

Stringfield hates america too, but he is more dishonest, and is pretending somehow like outsourcing as many jobs as possible and becoming too dependant on imports and overseas labor is somehow good for americans.

Apple is worthy of more respect than stringfield, because at least apple is honest.

Stringfield is a traitorous internationalist fascist liar, worthy of the lowest form of disrespect and derision.

Please treat him accordingly.
 
RStringfield said:
You are not nearly as much of an internationalist nationalist or Jewish supporter of Islam as me. You are just imitation Naugahyde.

Durka durka.
Click to expand...

See, the new fascism is internationalist in flavor. While previous fascisms rallied around the country, this new internationalist fascism is determined to destroy all nations, or reduce their governments so they are mere enforcers of multinational corporate policy.

Im open to new terms to describe it. I think internationalist fascism is the best one so far.
 
The nation has not disappeared. We used to believe that the concept was totally without substance. Instead we see the nation arise as a palpitating reality before us! ... Class cannot destroy the nation. Class reveals itself as a collection of interests—but the nation is a history of sentiments, traditions, language, culture, and race. Class can become an integral part of the nation, but the one cannot eclipse the other.
The class struggle is a vain formula, without effect and consequence wherever one finds a people that has not integrated itself into its proper linguistic and racial confines—where the national problem has not been definitely resolved. In such circumstances the class movement finds itself impaired by an inauspicious historic climate.


:clap:
 
MakeMeASandwichBitch said:
The nation has not disappeared. We used to believe that the concept was totally without substance. Instead we see the nation arise as a palpitating reality before us! ... Class cannot destroy the nation. Class reveals itself as a collection of interests—but the nation is a history of sentiments, traditions, language, culture, and race. Class can become an integral part of the nation, but the one cannot eclipse the other.
The class struggle is a vain formula, without effect and consequence wherever one finds a people that has not integrated itself into its proper linguistic and racial confines—where the national problem has not been definitely resolved. In such circumstances the class movement finds itself impaired by an inauspicious historic climate.


:clap:
Click to expand...


But in internationalist fascism, national unity is destroyed, as multinational corporate ceo's and managers cheerily destroy the lives of other citizens on behalf of their overseas masters, and then feel enlightened about it.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Both stringfield and apple are globalization advocates.

Apple is actually more honest on the impact it will have on american lives. It will hurt us, and that's in accordance with apples' hatred for america.

Stringfield hates america too, but he is more dishonest, and is pretending somehow like outsourcing as many jobs as possible and becoming too dependant on imports and overseas labor is somehow good for americans.

Apple is worthy of more respect than stringfield, because at least apple is honest.

Stringfield is a traitorous internationalist fascist liar, worthy of the lowest form of disrespect and derision.

Please treat him accordingly.
Click to expand...

Hatred? You're the expert when it comes to hatred.

All the western world has to make an adjustment, not just the US, unless you have a better idea on how to balance things.
 
AssHatZombie said:
But in internationalist fascism, national unity is destroyed, as multinational corporate ceo's and managers cheerily destroy the lives of other citizens on behalf of their overseas masters, and then feel enlightened about it.
Click to expand...

Look at Afghanistan. The tribes operate on a form of nationalism and proceed to kill each other. We all know a united Afghanistan would be better for all the people of Afghanistan but the tribal leaders are against one country government just like you're against one world government. Do you see the similarity?
 
apple0154 said:
Hatred? You're the expert when it comes to hatred.

All the western world has to make an adjustment, not just the US, unless you have a better idea on how to balance things.
Click to expand...

We don't have to balance things. Our economies don't have to be interdependant. This is a massive fiction.
 
apple0154 said:
Look at Afghanistan. The tribes operate on a form of nationalism and proceed to kill each other. We all know a united Afghanistan would be better for all the people of Afghanistan but the tribal leaders are against one country government just like you're against one world government. Do you see the similarity?
Click to expand...

That's tribalism.
 
Threedee said:
MS is better than Apple!!!

Internationalist fascism remains, as before, an oxymoron. Carry on!
Click to expand...

No. Internationalist is an adjective which describes the new kind of fascism the globalists are pushing for. Hence, we have internationalist fascism, the new fascism which seeks to reduce the governments of all nations to mere skeletal versions which merely enforce the policy desires of multinational corporations.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top